영어에서 DCMI abstract 을 사용하는 예와 한국어로 번역
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Programming
-
Computer
The DCMI Abstract Model.
This level corresponds to explicit use of the DCMI Abstract Model in the metadata.
The DCMI Abstract Model a Description.
Again this is a simpler model than that of the description set defined by the DCMI Abstract Model.
Conformance with the DCMI Abstract Model is not a requirement.
The drafts for both formats were updated in 2007 to reflect changes made to the DCMI Abstract Model.
(In the DCMI Abstract Model, a Description applies to about one, and only one, resource).
The metadata must be structured using the DCMI Abstract Model notions of Descriptions and Description Sets.
If not, the term is not citable in RDF statements and is therefore not usable in metadata based on the DCMI Abstract Model.
The DCMI Abstract Model itself does not define any such concrete formats or syntaxes for representing a DC metadata description set;
Note that this is a much simpler model than that of the description set defined by the DCMI Abstract Model.
(The relationship of the DC-XML-2003 format to the DCMI Abstract Model is discussed further in Section 5 and Appendix A below.).
If the term in question is not clearly defined as one of these four types, it has no recognized function in metadata based on the DCMI Abstract Model.
Free text"(i.e., strings of characters) is called a Value String in the DCMI Abstract Model and can be used with properties of either a literal or non-literal range.
The consolidation of RDF motivated an effort to translate the mixed-vocabulary metadata style of the Dublin Core community into an RDF-compatible DCMI Abstract Model(2005).
Description Set Profiles are based on the DCMI Abstract Model(DCAM) inasmuch they specify how the entities of the DCAM are used in a specific set of metadata.
Leaving aside considerations of machine-processability("formal" semantics), such vocabularies provide a basis for sharing meanings within and between groups of people-- an"informal" interoperability which does not require the use of URIs to reference terms,formally specified domains and ranges, or higher-order constructs such as the DCMI Abstract Model[ABSTRACT-MODEL].
The DCMI Abstract Model was designed to bridge the modern paradigm of unbounded, linked data graphs with the more familiar paradigm of validatable metadata records like those used in OAI-PMH.
On top of the unbounded graphs specified by RDF, the DCMI Abstract Model layers the notions of bounded Descriptions and Description Sets, providing a basis for the validation and exchange of metadata records[ABSTRACT-MODEL].
The DCMI Abstract Model, published as a DCMI Recommendation in March 2005, provides a metadata model of the kind required for formalizing a notion of machine-processable application profiles.
Metadata structured according to the DCMI Abstract Model-- for example, data creating using recent syntax guidelines from DCMI-- could be said to be"DCMI Abstract Model-interoperable".
Background 2.1 The DCMI Abstract Model Since 2003, DCMI has sought to formalize its model for Dublin Core metadata, and this has resulted in the publication of the DCMI Abstract Model[ABSTRACT-MODEL], the second version of which was given the status of DCMI Recommendation in June 2007.