영어에서 Proponents argue 을 사용하는 예와 한국어로 번역
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Programming
-
Computer
Proponents argue that this will reduce the government's healthcare costs.
In September 2015 the federal government announced that Australia would accept 12,000 Syrian refugees Proponents argue that Australia has a duty to join its allies in Europe and accept at least 12,000 refugees.
Proponents argue that the Euro will lose value if the Greek economy fails.
Proponents argue that the plan will stop the NHS's"drive to privatisation.".
Proponents argue that it does not prefer one religious denomination over another.
Proponents argue that too many young people are receiving government benefits after school.
Proponents argue that the law is necessary to prevent terrorists re-entering the country.
Proponents argue that the profits corporations generate should be taxed just like citizen's taxes.
Proponents argue that the deal prevented jobs from moving overseas and will help grow the U.S. economy.
Proponents argue that leaving the EU could cost Ireland a permanent loss of 3.1% GDP.
Proponents argue that the selective pressure placed on all natural life forms minimizes and removes failures.
Proponents argue that it is immoral to ban people with pre-existing conditions from getting health insurance.
Proponents argue that the fighter is necessary for the U.S. military to maintain its edge over foreign adversaries.
Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants.
Proponents argue that cutting legalizing marijuana will reduce crime by putting drug dealers out of business.
Proponents argue that all immigrants applying to live in Germany should have knowledge about their new country.
Proponents argue that the EU lacks a united defence force to handle sudden conflicts outside of NATO.
Proponents argue that it would streamline intelligence amongst member countries and prevent future terrorist attacks.
Proponents argue that the deal will grow the economy by giving exporters greater access to the expanding Chinese economy.
Proponents argue that the ban infringes on individual rights and prevents people from expressing their religious beliefs.
Proponents argue that the ban only affects 10 airports and will encourage them to expand screening of all checked baggage.
Proponents argue that Ireland should join other developed countries and do its part to limit carbon emissions by 2020.
Proponents argue that the jobs and tax revenue created by the companies eventually offset the cost of any awarded incentives.
Proponents argue that the sanctions are a necessary threat to keep EU members from voting in oppressive authoritarian regimes.
Proponents argue that prisons run by private companies are consistently more cost effective than those run by government agencies.
Proponents argue that the GCSE encourages students to work hard in school and provides clarity for college admissions and employers.
Proponents argue that it will help the military retain more women, who tend to leave the services permanently when they have children.
Proponents argue that this is lower than other developed countries and aid spending should be increased to help combat poverty and illnesses in developing countries.
Proponents argue that the additional revenue made by telecoms on these packages would enable them to invest in their infrastructure and take on dominant companies like Netflix and Google.
Proponents argue that the agreement is necessary to counter China and Russia's influence and the agreement will generate billions of dollars in revenue for U.S. military defense contractors.