Ví dụ về việc sử dụng He also argued trong Tiếng anh và bản dịch của chúng sang Tiếng việt
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
He also argued that God could not love man.
Not only did he opposedAristotle's views that Earth centered Universe, but he also argued for the existence of extraterrestrials.
He also argued that Trump has gone weak on cybertheft.
While Washington accepted the fact that it was natural for people to organize andoperate within groups like political parties, he also argued that every government has recognized political parties as an enemy and has sought to repress them because of their tendency to seek more power than other groups and take revenge on political opponents.
He also argued that the use of tech in schools should be limited.
He also argued that the destruction represents one of the basic drives.
He also argued that the use of tech in schools should be limited.
He also argued that the belief in spiritual beings exists in all known societies.
He also argued, in 1971, that the most important social good is self-respect.
He also argued the cultural significance of the location and its vicinity to Jerusalem.
He also argued that climatic conditions depended on the latitude of a geographic location.
He also argued that a wealth tax would generate no more than 8 billion euros($9.9 billion) a year.
But he also argued that there's not“a great online college” yet, due to four main factors.
But he also argued the Munich agreement signed by France and Britain wrecked efforts to build an anti-Nazi alliance.
He also argued that the foreign buyer tax, introduced last August, doesn't fully explain the collapse in sales either.
He also argued that the authorities must consider that supervising humans with machines may backfire in unexpected ways.
He also argued that full legal privileges should not be withheld or bestowed for religious reasons, an unusual view at the time.
He also argued that with the foundation of the Islamic Republic in Iran there were no obstacles that inhibited the cooperation between two countries.
He also argued successfully that the game should be changed so that a hitter was not out unless an opposing player caught the ball in the air.
He also argued that sending the 13 M-113 armored personnel carriers through the Cong Ba Ky Canal would enable the Viet Cong to retreat because it might take too much time.
He also argued that the best form of government is one based on authoritarian control, and that ethics is irrelevant in the context of effective rule.
He also argued that the EU was impeding the economic growth of Europe, and argued for stricter supervision on banks in the EU and for reforms in the sector.
He also argued that conversely, a system that is propped up and insulated from risk ultimately becomes more vulnerable to catastrophic loss in the face of rare, unpredictable events.
But he also argued that it was politically dangerous and that this danger stemmed from historicism's natural and close allegiance with what Popper called“utopian social engineering.”.
He also argued that such ventures are potentially lucrative, highlighting the income earned by the Fed and noting that"we all know that a central bank is a very profitable business.".
He also argued that China can no longer act like a developing country, but must bear its“share of responsibility upholding and supporting the global system” that has made it so rich and powerful.
He also argued that Indonesia hadn't met the criteria under international law for conducting a trial in absentia and that it hadn't ensured al-Warraq was promptly notified of the guilty verdict.
He also argued that NATO was outdated, saying"bloc stereotypes of thinking of previous years cannot be an effective tool for seeking and taking effective decisions in the fast-changing conditions of the modern world.".
He also argued that Falun Gong materials“tell people to be benevolent, and clarify the facts” about the persecution to the benefit of society, and hence the“evidence” proves that Zhang is not guilty.
He also argued that sentencing in financial crimes is often based on financial loss, and there was no economic loss in this case because the Iowa Lottery never paid the prize for the winning Hot Lotto ticket.