Ví dụ về việc sử dụng Switching costs trong Tiếng anh và bản dịch của chúng sang Tiếng việt
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Switching costs for customers.
In the software realm,the biggest risk to be aware of has to do with switching costs.
Switching costs of the supply side: are low.
But even a minimal investment can lead to lock-in,especially when we are faced with switching costs.
High customer switching costs help them do that.
Competitors have a very difficult time taking marketshare away from the industry leader because of these cumbersome switching costs.
This may also increase switching costs for drivers if Uber takes a larger market share.
We do not believe the rest of the worldis as committed to Apple's product ecosystem, so switching costs outside the US tend to be lower.
Switching costs- or the time, money, or effort it requires to make a change- are more complex.
The immaturity of blockchain technology also increases the switching costs, which are considerable given all the other system components.
The switching costs for both passengers and drivers are relatively low, which means new entrants can buy market share by subsidising trips and earnings.
When we make an initial investment in something, switching costs are hypothetical and in the future, so we tend to underestimate them.
But the lower switching costs make it easier for new drivers to join(no multi-year apprenticeship, certificates, etc) effectively reducing the bargaining power of the supply side and- interestingly- increasing the value proposition for new joiners at the same time.
Investment in loyalty management isparticularly imperative if consumers face low switching costs, since they are not confined by a contract(Kumar and Shah, 2004).
Other vendors made good profits over certain periods but none of them anywhere close to“Wintel” if you look over the last 3 decades, many component manufacturers went out of business asnewer technologies frog-leaped theirs(refer to supplier switching costs above).
Fortunately for those individuals, the switching costs between different Linux distribution options are fairly low, so they can vote with their feet.
When a company is able to establish itself in an industry,suppliers and customers can be subject to high switching costs should they choose to do business with a new competitor.
This costs you time in both mental switching costs and in physically moving your hand and eyes to different areas of the test.
If it's difficult or near impossible for you to switch, that means they have the upper hand, whereas, if the switching costs are low, you can negotiate better terms for yourself.
But if a company were to come along that offered to pay for switching costs, guaranteed little to no downtime, and was so intuitive it wouldn't require massive employee training, those switching costs could slowly erode.
If it's difficult or near impossible for you to switch, that means they have the upper hand, whereas, if the switching costs are low, you can negotiate better terms for yourself.
The more a client buys from a vendor, the higher the switching cost.
Paper[2] proposes switching cost only for directed graphs.
In psychology terms, this mental price is called the switching cost.
HFO-1234yf has the lowest switching cost for automakers among the currently proposed alternatives, although the initial cost of the product is much higher than that of R134a.
Apple's switching cost from one component vendor to another may be considered high, but they are a one-off cost of design and integration and are low on a unit cost basis given large volumes.
Suppliers will generally pass their switch costs onto the buyer in the long run but economies of scale play a big role in this discussion as low scale will require higher unit cost increases(or longer amortisation times and profit compression).
That means every time we pause to answer a new notification or get an alert from a different app on our phone, we're being interrupted, and with that interruption we pay a price:something called a“switch cost.”.