Esimerkkejä Second member state käytöstä Englanti ja niiden käännökset Suomi
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
The second Member State must be informed of the main conditions of this mobility.
If the long‑term residents have no plans to work or study, the second Member State may ask for evidence of resources and sickness insurance.
The second Member State may apply measures in accordance with Article 20(6) of this Directive.
Where the international protection has been withdrawn by a final decision, the second Member State shall not enter the remark referred to in paragraph 4.”.
The second Member State shall reject an application for an EU Blue Card in any of the following cases.
President-in-Office.-(SL) I would like to thank Mr Cohn-Bendit for reminding us of the fact that,yesterday, Slovenia was the second Member State to ratify the new Treaty of Lisbon.
Second Member State” means any Member State other than the first Member State. .
During a five‑year transitional period, the second Member State may take a decision to expel a long‑term resident and/or family members. .
If the examination of the application andthe accompanying documentation shows that the long‑term resident meets the conditions for the exercise of right of residence, the second Member State must issue a residence permit.
The second Member State may ask the family members concerned to present with their application for a residence permit.
To check for compliance with the conditions provided for by Article 16(1)(a), the second Member State may ask the persons concerned to present with their application for a residence permit.
The second Member State may also ask for evidence that long‑term residents have an actual or promised employment contract.
Paragraphs 2 to 4 contain an exhaustive list of the items of evidence that the second Member State may ask of long‑term residents who move and apply for a residence permit.
The second Member State may require the family members concerned to present with their application for a residence permit.
The Common position introduces the"notification" procedure(as in the ICT Directive), a simplified procedure whereby students and researchers can move to a second Member State on the basis of the authorisation of the first Member State. .
In all events the second Member State may check whether applicants have identity documents and a long‑term resident's permit.
The second Member State shall notify the first Member State of the rejection for the purpose of point(f) of Article 72.
In addition to the derogations listed in Article 16, the second Member State shall not require the evidence referred to in points(a) and(b) of Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/86/EC.
The second Member State may reject an application for an EU Blue Card where the third-country national repetitively makes use of the possibility to enter and work in second Member States pursuant to this Article in an abusive manner.
No later than three months after entering the territory of the second Member State, the long‑term resident shall apply to the competent authorities of that Member State for a residence permit.
The second Member State shall notify its decision to the first Member State, which shall withdraw the status from the persons concerned.
This Article provides procedural guarantees where the second Member State rejects an applications for residence permits made by long‑term residents and/or members of their family.
The second Member State shall grant long‑term residents the status provided for by Article 8, subject to the provisions of Articles 6 and 7.
In accordance with the procedures set out in Article 12, the second Member State shall process the notification and inform in writing the applicant and the first Member State of its decision to.
The second Member State shall not require any authorisation for exercising the business activity other than the EU Blue Card issued by the first Member State. .
Given this situation, it is also vital to ensure that the second Member State in question observes the principle of non-refoulement, so that the person in question is not sent back to a country where he or she would be in danger.
The second Member State shall reject an application for an EU Blue Card where the third-country national poses a threat to public policy, public security or public health.
Following the same logic, periods spent in the second Member State are taken into account in calculating the period of residence giving entitlement to autonomous status under the Council Directive on the right to family reunification.
Moreover, the second Member State is not given any opportunity to verify in any way the work permit that was issued in the first Member State along with the residence permit.
The second Member State may check whether there are grounds of public policy or domestic security for refusing to issue a residence permit to long‑term residents and/or their family members. .