Hvad er oversættelsen af " GOLDSTONE-RAPPORTEN " på engelsk?

• goldstone report

Eksempler på brug af Goldstone-rapporten på Dansk og deres oversættelser til Engelsk

Goldstone-rapporten er meget vigtig.
The Goldstone report is a very important one.

FI Hr. formand! Jeg stemte mod Goldstone-rapporten.
FI Mr President, I voted against the Goldstone report.

NL Hr. formand! Goldstone-rapporten er for ensidig.
NL Mr President, the Goldstone report is too one-sided.

Beslutningen er faktisk lige så ensidig som selve Goldstone-rapporten.
As a matter of fact, the resolution is just as one-sided as the Goldstone report itself.

EL Hr. formand! Goldstone-rapporten rammer sømmet på hovedet.
EL Mr President, the Goldstone report hits the nail on the head.

EU kan ikke undlade at forholde sig til indholdet af Goldstone-rapporten.
The European Union cannot remain indifferent in response to the content of the Goldstone report.

Hr. formand! Goldstone-rapporten er usædvanlig uafbalanceret og uretfærdig.
Mr President, the Goldstone report is exceptionally unbalanced and unfair.

IT Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer! Den offentlige opinion er delt i spørgsmålet om Goldstone-rapporten.
IT Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, public opinion is divided on the Goldstone report.

Jeg mener faktisk ikke, at Goldstone-rapporten er konstruktiv i den henseende.
As it happens, I do not think that the Goldstone report is constructive in this regard.

Goldstone-rapporten er et dokument, der har vakt store følelser og foranlediget betydelig strid.
The Goldstone report is a document which has created a great deal of emotion and controversy.

Hr. Brok, hvad er forskellen mellem Goldstone-rapporten og den efterfølgende resolution?
Mr Brok, what is the difference between the Goldstone report and the resolution that followed?

Det er helt uacceptabelt, at Rådet stadig ikke har støttet anbefalingerne i Goldstone-rapporten.
It is quite unacceptable that the Council still has not endorsed the recommendations of the Goldstone report.

DE Hr. formand! Goldstone-rapporten beskriver krænkelser af menneskerettighederne fra begge sider.
DE Mr President, the Goldstone report describes human rights violations by both sides.

Den 5. november 2009 vedtog FN's Generalforsamling Goldstone-rapporten og vedtog resolution 64/10.
On 5 November 2009, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Goldstone report and passed Resolution 64/10.

Hr. formand! Goldstone-rapporten forsøger at opfylde det mandat, der blev udstukket.
On behalf of the ALDE Group.- Mr President, the Goldstone report tries to fulfil the mandate it was given.

Vi kan snart forvente at modtage en udførlig evaluering af Goldstone-rapporten, og jeg mener ikke, vi skal foregribe den.
We can soon expect to receive a full evaluation of the Goldstone report and I believe that we should not anticipate it.

Goldstone-rapporten bør anvendes til at skabe ny dynamik med henblik på at nå frem til en retfærdig løsning.
The Goldstone report should be used to give new impetus, with a view to achieving a fair solution.

IT Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer! FN's Menneskerettighedsråd vedtog Goldstone-rapporten med overvældende flertal.
IT Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the UN Human Rights Council has adopted the Goldstone report by an overwhelming majority.

Og hvad synes de om Goldstone-rapporten og FN's Menneskerettighedsråds vedtagelse af denne?
What do they think of the Goldstone report and its adoption by the United Nations Human Rights Council?

Selv om EU ikke har støttet alle anbefalingerne, har man gjort det klart, at man tager Goldstone-rapporten meget alvorligt.
Although the EU has not endorsed all the recommendations, it made it clear that it takes the Goldstone report very seriously.

Jeg mener ikke, at Goldstone-rapporten er grundlag for yderligere terrorangreb mod Israel- det retfærdiggør den ikke.
I do not believe that the Goldstone report is a basis for further terrorist attacks on Israel- it does not justify that.

Det fjerde punkt vedrørende Gaza. Jeg mener, at det vil være mere hensigtsmæssigt at tage dette punkt i den næste forhandling om Goldstone-rapporten.
The fourth point, on Gaza: I think it would be more appropriate to take up this point in the next discussion on the Goldstone report.

Hovedbeskyldningen i Goldstone-rapporten, nemlig at Israel bevidst og vedvarende angreb civile, holder ikke vand.
The main accusation of the Goldstone report, that Israel deliberately and continually attacked civilians, does not hold water.

Hans navn bliver trukket gennem sølet. Han kaldes for en antisemit, selv om der ikke kun peges fingre ad Israel i Goldstone-rapporten.
His name is being dragged through the mud; he is being called an anti-Semite, even though Israel is not the only one to have the finger pointed at it in the Goldstone report.

Den amerikanske Kongres betegnede Goldstone-rapporten som uoprettelig partisk og uværdig til yderligere overvejelse eller legitimitet.
The US Congress called the Goldstone report irremediably biased and unworthy of further consideration or legitimacy.

DE Hr. formand! Ingen af konfliktens parter har indtil videre opfyldt FN's krav om en troværdig og uafhængig undersøgelse af beskyldningerne i Goldstone-rapporten.
DE Mr President, neither party to the conflict has so far met the demands of the United Nations for a credible and independent investigation into the accusations of the Goldstone report.

Goldstone-rapporten har endnu en gang vist, at undersøgelser foretaget af de stridende parter selv næppe nogensinde er upartiske og objektive.
The Goldstone report has once again showed that investigations carried out by the warring parties themselves are hardly ever impartial and objective.

Den rapport, som beslutningen omhandler- Goldstone-rapporten- er partisk og behandler ikke alle de faktorer, der førte til konflikten, på samme måde.
The report to which the resolution refers- the Goldstone report- is biased, and does not treat all the factors which led to the conflict equally.

Goldstone-rapporten nævner ikke, hvad der udløste den israelske operation i Gaza: næsten 12 000 raket- og morterangreb mod israelske civile.
The Goldstone report fails to mention the reason that triggered the Israeli operation in Gaza: nearly 12 000 attacks with rockets and mortars against Israeli civilians.

Jeg kan f. eks. nævne, at Goldstone-rapporten om krænkelser af den internationale humanitære lovgivning under krigen i Gaza har fået en meget problematisk modtagelse i medlemsstaterne.
For example, I might mention that the Goldstone report on the breaches of international humanitarian law during the war in Gaza has had a very controversial reception in the Member States.