Eksempler på brug af Disguised restriction på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Financial
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The provisions of this Chapter shall not be used as a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade.
However, such prevention of marketing constitutes a disguised restriction on trade between Member States within the meaning of the second sentence of Article 36 where.
The national provision must not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States;
Nevertheless such prevention may constitute a disguised restriction on trade be tween Member States within the meaning of the second sentence of Article 36 of the Treaty if it is established that the proprietor of different marks has followed the practice of using such marks for the purpose of artificially partitioning the markets.
An exception should not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on the freedom of movement of capital.
In fact, Article 36 of the Treaty permits prohibitions or restrictions on the movement of goods if justified on certain grounds such as health protection,on condition that these grounds are not used as a means of arbitrary discrimination or disguised restrictions on trade.
The measures andprocedures referred to in paragraphs 1 and2 shall not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on the free movement of capital and payments asdefined in Article 56.
OPINION OF MR BOT- CASE C-194/06 of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on the free movement of capital and payments as defined in Article 56[EC].' investments by such enterprises as far as possible the same as that on direct investments by private individuals.
Such pro hibitions orrestrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade.
The use of either symbol shall not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
In its judgment of 20 May 1976 in Case 104/75, which was concerned with national regulations relating to imports of medicinal preparations, the Court had to define these wide concepts of'measures for the protection of health' which'are justified' andin no way constitute'arbitrary discrimination' ot'a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
Such prohibitions orrestrictions must not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between the Contracting Parties.
Under Article 30 EC, prohibitions or restrictions on imports are permitted if they are justified in particular on grounds of public security and the protection of health and life of humans,provided they do not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
Such prohibitions orrestrictions must not, however, con stitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between the Contracting Parties.
Article 36 of the EEC Treaty permits the Member States to introduce ormaintain in force prohibitions and restrictions on imports, exports or goods in transit'justified on grounds of the protection of health' but it provides that such measures'shall not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
Such prohibitions orrestrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary dis crimination or a disguised restriction on trade uutwucu the Contracting Parties.
In fact, Article 36 of the Treaty permits prohibitions or restrictions on the movement of goods if justified on certain grounds such as public policy, the protection of health and life, industrial and commercial policy,on condition that such grounds are not used as a means of arbitrary discrimination or disguised restrictions on trade.
Such prohibitions orrestrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
Such prohibitions orrestrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary dis crimination or a disguised restriction on trade.
SUCH PROHIBITIONS ORRESTRICTIONS MUST NOT, HOWEVER, CONSTITUTE A MEANS OF ARBITRARY DISCRIMINATION OR A DISGUISED RESTRICTION ON TRADE BETWEEN THE CONTRACTING PARTIES.
Such prohibitions or restrictions shall in no case constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction of trade generally.
Preliminary ruling- Oberlandesgericht Köln Interpretation of Article 36 of the EC Treaty Conduct of a trademark holder in the context of the parallel import of a pharmaceutical product Disguised restriction on trade Conditions governing the finding of an artificial partitioning of the markets.
JÄGER provided for by Article 58(1)(a) EC is itself limited by Article 58(3) EC,according to which the national provisions shall not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on the free movement of capital.
In accordance with Article 58(3) of the Treaty, the provisions of Member States' tax law designed to counter abuse orfraud should not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on the free movement of capital and payments as established by Article 56 of the Treaty.
In this respect, however, the Treaty contains a specific carve-out referring to prudential measures( 21),provided that these exceptions do not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on the free movement of capital 22.
The Commission shall, within six months of the notifications as referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5, approve or reject the national provisions involved after having verified whether ornot they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States and whether or not they shall constitute an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.
Vie Commission shall confirm the provisions involved after having verified thai they are not a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
BEARING IN MIND that measures taken to reduce sulphur emissions should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international competition and trade.
In particular, it must establish whether the provisions in question are justified on grounds of the major needs mentioned in the first subparagraph of Article 100a(4) andare not a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
Determination of the criteria of risk of confusion and similarity continue to be a matter for national law, subject to the limits set out in the secondsentence of Article 36:there must be no arbitrary discrimination or disguised restriction ontrade between Member States.