Eksempler på brug af Is that member states på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The other issue is that Member States should admit the refugees voluntarily.
One scenario envisaged by the Commission as part of Agenda 2000 is that Member States should cofinance the CAP.
A new feature is that Member States are being asked to exercise more discipline.
One of the difficulties with the Lisbon Agenda in particular is that Member States themselves promise to deliver but do not.
The problem is that Member States do not want to come to an agreement, and are perhaps looking for a bandage to stop the bleeding.
Folk også translate
The essential feature of matters falling under exclusive competence of the Union is that Member States may only act in such fields if authorised by the Union.
The crucial point is that Member States meet their budgetary commitments, as I pointed out during a conference in Athens last week.
Since trade policy was foolishly handed over to the exclusive competence of the EU,the plain truth is that Member States are powerless to act in the face of cheap imports ravaging their textile industry.
One way to restructure is that Member States can actually buy quotas from farmers and put these quotas into the national reserve.
The real problem of BSE is caused not by large or small-scale businesses or the number of cattle per hectare:the real problem is that Member States have made a mockery of European rules and hence, in fact, have abused the trust of European consumers and farmers.
However, the truth is that Member States cannot form a constructive opinion about the future without a concrete proposal for its renegotiation from the Commission or from the Presidency.
I hope that no one is deterred by stringent measures for fear of the European Union being depicted as the bogeyman by the Member States, as the truth is that Member States need external pressure, possibly even a bogeyman, because they cannot cope with the task alone in the age of globalisation.
The goal of the Council Meeting is that Member States will come closer to a common position, ensuring that the negotiations with the European Parliament can begin.
The first thing that could creep in is that Member States will seek to use European money to solve their own problems.
Our constant desire is that Member States will seek to exceed these minima, even though they are of a satisfactory level for the general purposes of maintaining the safety of aircraft and passengers.
The second point which becomes clear is that Member States appear to be unable to handle this sort of issue.
The issue is that Member States usually ask us for a realistic lapse of time, so that implementation can proceed, as far as possible, in a coherent manner, avoiding distortions in the internal market, or at least in what we believe should be the internal market.
One important conclusion that we can draw from this exercise is that Member States can cope with ageing societies and avoid a financial or social disaster in their pension systems.
One negative point is that Member States will have the option of imposing an obligation to notify on consumers as a condition for being able to exercise the rights in question.
The Swedish Presidency of the Council has recognised that, in the current economic crisis, the key priority is that Member States must be able to respond jointly to challenges and find solutions for overcoming the economic and financial crisis and, above all, reducing unemployment and its adverse social consequences.
However, the key issue is that Member States need to prove their commitment to free movement by tackling problems openly and in a spirit which favours residents of the European Union.
The important thing in this context is that Member States should be able to share their experiences with other Member States so that they can do the same things.
Its basic principle is that Member States must respect the underlying rule that companies granted monopoly rights must, in principle, comply with the Treaty's rules, and must not, there fore, act to undermine this.
The main argument in the report is that Member States should be left some leeway when it comes to applying taxation, so long as the single market is not affected.
Another discovery is that Member States work out all their payments to the European Union to the last cent, but when it comes to spending this money, they start feeling generous and even make it easier for fraudsters, for example, by still taking an average of 36 months to even report irregularities to the European Union.
One of the possible problems that may result from EMU is that Member States are less able to cope with national upsets, in other words shocks which affect one country and not the others.
The basic reason for this is that Member States will not accept the authority of other Member States as giving authority for pharmaceuticals to circulate on their own territory.
The Committee on Petitions and I, myself,know that what often happens is that Member States either do not respond in time or, as we say in Spain, and I do not know if there is a good translation, they"make the partridge dizzy" try to deceive one.
What I would suggest instead is that Member States forward their own national list to the Commission who, on the basis of that information, would submit a proposal to the Council for add ing other appropriate substances to Annex I. Perhaps that is the way out of this particular dilemma.
The objective of the proposed directive is that Member States take the necessary measures to achieve good environmental status in the marine environment by the year 2020 at the latest.