Hvad er oversættelsen af " MALIK SHAH " på dansk?

• malik shah

Eksempler på brug af Malik shah på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk

Two years later, in 467(1074), Malik Shah restored Kirman to Qara Arslan's son Rukn al-Dawla Sultan Shah..
Malik Shah gav to år senere i 467(1074) Kerman tilbage til Qara Arslans søn, Rukn al-Dawla Sultan Shah..

The last Salduqid malika(Queen) of Erzurum was Nasir al-Din's sister, Mama Khatun, but she was overthrown by her own nephew, Malik Shah.
Den sidste saltuqidiske malika(dronning) af Erzurum var Nasir al-Dins søster, Mama Khatun, men hun blev afsat af sin egen nevø, Malik Shah.

In addition, events that took place in the later years of Malik Shah's reign showed that the Saljuq empire was not unassailable.
Derudover viste begivenheder i Malik Shahs senere regeringsår, at det seljukkiske rige ikke var uindtageligt.

After the death of Malik Shah in 485 H(1092 AD), the Saljuqs were rocked by dissent until Sanjar decided to split the state in 511 1117.
Efter Malik Shahs død i 485 H(1092 AD) var seljukkerne rystet af splid, indtil Sanjar ibn Malik Shah besluttede at opsplitte riget i 511 1117.

He suggested that he should retire to Oman, but on the advice of the vizier Nizam al-Mulk, Malik Shah told him to return to Kirman.
Han foreslog selv, at han skulle trække sig tilbage til Oman, men på vesiren Nizam al-Mulks råd beordrede Malik Shah ham til at vende tilbage til Kerman.

Sanjar, another of Malik Shah's many sons, was both the longest-lived and the last of all the Great Saljuq rulers.
Historisk kommentar Sanjar, som var en af Malik Shahs mange sønner, var både den længst levende og den sidste storseljukkiske hersker.

Qara Arslan was forgiven, but the overlordship of Alp Arslan still rankled, and after the latter's death in 465(1072) he challenged Malik Shah's succession to the Saljuq leadership.
Qara Arslan blev tilgivet, men Alp Arslans overherredømme nagede fortsat, og efter dennes død i 465(1072) bestred han Malik Shahs arveret til det seljukkiske overherredømme.

The third Great Saljuq ruler, Malik Shah ibn Alp Arslan, continued with the triumphs of his father, and sometimes surpassed them.
Historisk kommentar Den tredje storseljukkiske hersker Malik Shah ibn Alp Arslan fortsatte faderens triumfer, og indimellem overgik han dem.

However, the rival party, made up of Nizam al-Mulk's former supporters, seized armaments that he had stored in Isfahan, and took them to al-Rayy, where the twelve year old Barkiyaruq ibn Malik Shah was recognized as ruler.
Men det rivaliserende parti, bestående af Nizam al-Mulks tidligere støtter, snuppede våbnene, som han havde oplagret i Isfahan, og bragte dem til al-Rayy, hvor den 12-årige Barkiyaruq ibn Malik Shah blev anerkendt som hersker.

Later, under Malik Shah's son Barkiyaruq, Qutlugh Beg added his own title of honour, Fakhr al-Dawla("Glory of the State"), to the legends on his coins.
Senere, under Malik Shahs søn Barkiyaruq, tilføjede Qutlugh Beg sin egen ærestitel, Fakhr al-Dawla(Statens Pryd) til sine mønters indskrifter.

It is a coin of a previously unknown type in the name of both Malik Shah and his governor of Shiraz, Fakhr al-Muluk Qutlugh Beg, one of Nizam al-Mulk's many sons.
Det er en mønt af en hidtil ukendt type, præget i både Malik Shahs og hans guvernør over Shiraz, Fahkr al-Muluk Qutlugh Begs navne.

Malik Shah also saw himself as a champion of Sunni Islam, and did all he could to prevent the Shi'ite Fatimids from expanding their power.
Malik Shah så også sig selv som en forkæmper for sunni-islam, og han gjorde alt, hvad han kunne, for at forhindre de shiitiske fatimider i at udvide deres magtområde.

Not only was there rivalry among the sons of Malik Shah and their supporters, but Nizam al-Mulk's many sons also took opposite sides in the conflict.
Ikke alene var der rivalisering mellem Malik Shahs sønner og deres tilhængere, men også Nizam al-Mulks mange sønner tog parti for enten den ene eller den anden side i konflikten.

Malik Shah then went to Baghdad, partly to protest against his daughter's treatment, but also because he was thinking of making Baghdad his winter capital.
Hun vendte hjem til faderen i 482(1089), og Malik Shah drog derefter til Baghdad, dels for at protestere over behandlingen af hans datter, og dels fordi han overvejede at gøre Baghdad til sin hovedstad om vinteren.

At first glance this coin, struck in Shiraz, would appear to emphasise Malik Shah's Sunni beliefs, because it resembles a dinar of the first period Abbasids struck in Egypt during the reign of al-Ma'mun.
Ved første øjekast synes denne mønt, der er præget i Shiraz, at understrege Malik Shahs sunnitiske overbevisning, fordi den minder om en dinar fra abbasidernes første periode, præget i Egypten under al-Ma'mun.

Near the end of his reign, in 487(1094), Turanshah marched into the neighbouring province of Fars to confront the military commander Ibrahim Inal, who had been sent by Malik Shah's powerful widow, Terken Khatun, to wrest the province away from him.
Turan Shah marcherede i 487(1094) tæt på slutningen af sin regeringsperiode ind i naboprovinsen Fars for at møde hærføreren Ibrahim Inal, som var blevet sendt af Malik Shahs magtfulde enke, Terken Khatun, for at vriste provinsen fra ham.

After Qilij Arslan abdicated Malik Shah took control of Konya and the treasury, despite the fact that Kaykhusraw was Qilij Arslan's chosen successor.
Da Qilij Arslan 2. var trådt tilbage, tog Malik Shah kontrol med Konya og skatkammeret på trods af, at Kay Khusraw var Qilij Arslans udvalgte efterfølger.

I am the eldest brother, and you are a youthful son; I have a greater right to my brother Alp Arslan's inheritance," he said, to which Malik Shah replied that the inheritance should go from father to son, and challenged Qara Arslan to a fight.
Jeg er den ældste bror og du er en ungdommelig søn. Jeg har større ret til min bror Alp Arslans arv" sagde han til Malik Shah, som svarede, at arven skulle gå fra far til søn og udfordrede Qara Arslan til en kamp.

The reigns of Alp Arslan and his son Malik Shah saw the high point of the Great Saljuq sultanate, when they were at their most powerful and controlled huge territories.
Alp Arslans og sønnen Malik Shahs regeringsperioder var højdepunktet for det storseljukkiske sultanat, hvor de var mest magtfulde og herskede over enorme områder.

However, when Malik Shah's forces grew restive and inclined to support Qara Arslan, he was strangled with a bowstring, probably to avoid the shedding of royal blood.
Da Malik Shahs tropper imidlertid blev utålmodige og tilbøjelige til at støtte Qara Arslan, blev denne kvalt med en buestreng, sandsynligvis for at undgå at udgyde kongeligt blod.

Finally Qilij Arslan, who had been taken prisoner in Konya by one of his sons, Qutb al-Din Malik Shah, begged Kaykhusraw to rescue him. Kaykhusraw took his father to his appanage on the border with Byzantium where the old man died in 588(1192), having tried unsuccessfully to restore harmony among his sons.
Qilij Arslan 2. var blevet taget til fange i Konya af en af sine sønner, Qutb al-Din Malik Shah, og han bønfaldt til slut Kay Khusraw om at redde sig. Kay Khusraw bragte sin far til sit område ved grænsen til Byzans, og her døde den gamle mand i 588(1192) efter at have forsøgt at genskabe harmoni iblandt sønnerne- uden held.

When the Malik Shah determined to reform the calendar, Omar was one of the eight learned men employed to do it, the result was the Jalali era(so called from Jalal-ud-din, one of the king's names)-'a computation of time,' says Gibbon,'which surpasses the Julian, and approaches the accuracy of the Gregorian style.
Når Malik Shah fast besluttet på at reformere den kalender, Omar var en af de otte lært mænd ansat til at gøre det, hvis resultat var Jalali æra(såkaldte fra Jalal-ud-DIN, en af kongens navne)-»en beregning af tid,«siger Gibbon', som overgår til Julian, og tilgange rigtigheden af de Gregorian Style.

In the event he did not need to, because Malik Shah left Baghdad in Rabi' I 485(March 1092), taking Abu'l-Fadl Ja'far with him, but was assassinated.
Da det kom til stykket behøvede han ikke gøre det, fordi Malik Shah forlod Baghdad i rabi' I 485(marts 1092), tog Abu'l-Fadl Ja'far med sig, og blev så myrdet.

In 598 H(1202 AD) Malik Shah was captured and imprisoned by the Rum Saljuq ruler Rukn al-Din Sulayman Shah, who seized his lands and thus brought Salduqid rule to an end.
Malik Shah blev i 598 H(1202 AD) taget til fange og fængslet af den rumseljukkiske hersker, Rukn al-Din Sulayman Shah, som erobrede hans landområder og således bragte det saltuqidiske styre til en ende.

He suggested that he should retire to Oman, but on the advice of the vizier Nizam al-Mulk, Malik Shah told him to return to Kirman. However, when Malik Shah's forces grew restive and inclined to support Qara Arslan, he was strangled with a bowstring, probably to avoid the shedding of royal blood.
Han foreslog selv, at han skulle trække sig tilbage til Oman, men på vesiren Nizam al-Mulks råd beordrede Malik Shah ham til at vende tilbage til Kerman. Da Malik Shahs tropper imidlertid blev utålmodige og tilbøjelige til at støtte Qara Arslan, blev denne kvalt med en buestreng, sandsynligvis for at undgå at udgyde kongeligt blod.

Apart from a short conflict with Malik Shah, who doubted his loyalty, Turanshah's was a peaceful reign, and under him Kirman appears to have continued to be a happy and prosperous land.
Bortset fra en kort konflikt med Malik Shah, som tvivlede på hans loyalitet, var Turan Shahs regeringsperiode fredfyldt, og under ham synes Kerman fortsat at have været et lykkeligt og fremgangsrigt land.

After his father's abdication Qutb al-Din Malik Shah had taken control in Konya, and tried to take the territories allotted to his brothers in an effort to restore central power.
Efter at Qilij Arslan 2. var trådt tilbage, havde sønnen Qutb al-Din Malik Shah taget kontrollen i Konya og prøvet at erobre de områder, der var tildelt hans brødre, i et forsøg på at genetablere en centralmagt.

Between 491 and 498(1098-1105) Barkiyaruq and Muhammad ibn Malik Shah, waged a seesaw struggle between themselves, which resulted in one brother and then the other being named on the coinage of Madinat al-Salam.
Mellem 491 og 498(1098-1105) stredes Barkiyaruq og Muhammed ibn Malik Shah med hinanden, med vekslende held, hvilket resulterede i, at snart den ene bror, snart den anden blev nævnt på udmøntningerne fra Baghdad.

The Saljuq rulers Tughril Beg, Alp Arslan and Malik Shah had all done their best to to prevent the Fatimids, with their Shi'ite beliefs, from gaining power, and used their influence to have the Abbasid caliph acknowledged in the eastern provinces.
De seljukkiske herskere Toghril Beg, Alp Arslan og Malik Shah havde alle gjort deres bedste for at forhindre, at fatimiderne med deres shia-muslimske overbevisning forøgede deres magt, og de havde brugt deres indflydelse for at få den abbasidiske kalif anerkendt i de østlige provinser.

While most of them follow the conventions of Saljuq gold coinage, giving Malik Shah the titles al-sultan al-mu'azzam("the Mighty Sultan"), mu'izz al-din("Strengthener of the Faith") and abu'l-fath("Father of Victory"), on this piece he is stripped of his titles and is simply called Malik Shah..
Mens de fleste af disse følger den seljukkiske guldudmøntnings normer og giver Malik Shah titlerne al-sultan al-mu'azzam(Den Mægtige Sultan), mu'izz al-din(Troens Styrker) og abu'l-fath(Sejrens Far), er han på denne mønt uden sine titler.