Eksempler på brug af Percentage of bathing areas på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The percentage of bathing areas complying with the guide values is particularly low, at 63.1.
Compliance with the mandatory values was up from 91.9 to 96.3% In the 1999 bathing season, while the percentage of bathing areas complying with the stricter guide values rose from 76.7% for the 1998 bathing season to 77.8.
The percentage of bathing areas failing to comply with the mandatory values was 1.3% compared to 1.5% in the previous year.
A marked improvement was observed in average bathing water quality in freshwater areas compared with the 2002 season, although the percentage of bathing areas complying with the more stringent guide values was still quite low.
The same applies to the percentage of bathing areas complying with the guide values(67.9%) which was down by practically 10.
With 0.7% of the bathing areas not sufficiently sampled, it is difficult to assess the status quo in the percentage of bathing areas which failed to comply compared with the previous bathing season on 1.6.
The percentage of bathing areas failing to comply with the mandatory values(3.7%) was 4.4% down on the pre vious bathing season.
There was, unfortunately, a slight fall in the percentage of bathing areas complying with the more stringent guide values from 66.8 to 64.1% for 2002.
The percentage of bathing areas failing to comply with the manda tory values fell sharply to 2.3% in the 2003 bathing season.
There was an equally spectacular reduction in the percentage of bathing areas failing to comply with the mandatory values, which fell from 50% in the 1998 bathing season to 21.6% in the 1999 season.
The percentage of bathing areas insufficiently sampled also fell slightly, from 0.7% in 1998 to 0.6% for the 1999 bathing season.
Following the same trend, the percentage of bathing areas insuf ficiently sampled(12.5%) was down by 2.4% but remained unacceptably high.
The percentage of bathing areas where bathing was prohibited is falling sharply, although this improvement offers little encouragement since analysis shows that 6 of the 14 areas where bathing was prohibited in 2002 were no longer included during the 2003 bathing season, which is regrettable.
A smaller fall was recorded in the percentage of bathing areas which complied with the more stringent guide values, which dropped to 82.8% for the 2003 bathing season.
The percentage of bathing areas not complying with the mandatory values fell by almost 2%- from 7.5% in 1998 to 5.6% for the 1999 bathing season.
A small increase was observed in the percentage of bathing areas complying with the mandatory values set by the directive coupled with a slightly more marked increase in the percentage complying with the more stringent guide values.
The percentage of bathing areas complying with the guide values(50.5%) and/or man datory values(91.4%) rose by 6.3 and 2.7% respectively.
The percentage of bathing areas not complying fdl sharply, but the percentage where bathing was prohibited doubled.
The percentage of bathing areas not complying with the mandatory values fell by 4% compared with the previous bathing season to 6.2.
Logically, the percentage of bathing areas which failed to comply with the mandatory values rose to 3.3% in the 2003 bathing season.
The percentage of bathing areas insufficiently sampled also fell fairly sharply, from 5.5% for the 1998 bathing sea son to 3.2% for the 1999 season.
The percentage of bathing areas complying with the stricter guide values rose by 14.2% to 36.4% for the 1999 bathing season.
The percentage of bathing areas complying with the mandatory values, which had been 100% during the previous bathing season, slipped back to 90.9% during the 1999 season.
The percentage of bathing areas not complying with the man datory values(3.2%) was down very sharply on the previous bathing season(10.6%) but remai ned significant.
The percentage of bathing areas complying with the guide values remained particularly low and even declined from 20.8% In the 1998 bathing sea son to 18.9% In the 1999 season.
The percentage of bathing areas complying with the guide values(66.8%) and/or mandatory values(90.2%) rose by 3.2 and 3.7% respectively compared with the 1998 bathing season.
Although the percentage of bathing areas complying with the mandatory values rose slightly, it remained fairly low, creeping from 83.2% during the 1998 bathing season to 85.4% in the 1999 season.
The percentage of bathing areas failing to comply with the mandatory values remained on 1%, while the percentage insufficiently sampled was down very slightly 0.2.
The percentage of bathing areas insufficiently sampled fell by 0.5%, but the percentage where bathing was prohibited rose sharply from 0.5% in the 1998 bathing season to 9.9.
Although the percentage of bathing areas failing to comply with the mandatory vales(2.1%) remained identical, the percentage where bathing was prohibited fell slightly to 0.1% for the 1999 bathing season.