Primeri uporabe Comparison tools v Angleški in njihovi prevodi v Slovenski
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
(i) a link or reference to where comparison tools referred to in Article 14 can be found.
The comparison tools may be operated by any entity, including private companies and public authorities or bodies.
That information should be made available as open data so as to give'app' developers andother comparison tools the opportunity to use it.
Independent, certified comparison tools need to be available for different financial products;
They should also ensure that third parties have the right to use, without charge, publicly available information published by such undertakings,with a view to providing comparison tools.
Comparison tools fulfilling the requirements in points(a) to(g) shall, upon request, be certified by national regulatory authorities.
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(x) monitoring the availability of comparison websites,including comparison tools that fulfil the criteria set out in Article 14 and Annex I.
(240) Independent comparison tools should be operationally independent from providers of publicly available electronic communications services.
Third parties shall have a right to use, free of charge and in open data formats, the information published by providers of internet access services or publicly available interpersonal communications services,for the purposes of making available such independent comparison tools.
Comparison tools fulfilling the requirements in points(a) to(g) shall, upon the request of the provider of the tool, be certified by national regulatory authorities.
It will also monitor the implementation of the principles for comparison tools that were drawn up by the multi-stakeholder dialogue on comparison tools that the Commission instigated.38.
Comparison tools fulfilling the requirements in points(a) to(h) of paragraph 3 shall, upon request by the provider of the tool, be certified by competent authorities.
Third parties shall have a right to use, free of charge, the information published by undertakings providing publicly available electronic communications services, other than number-independent interpersonal communications services,for the purposes of making available such independent comparison tools.
Member States shall require the comparison tools referred to in paragraph 1 to include comparative determinants relating to the nature of the services offered by the suppliers.
Third parties shall have a right to use, free of charge, and in open data formats, the information published by undertakings providing providers of internet access services and/or publicly available electronic communications services, other than numberindependent interpersonal communications services,for the purposes of making available such independent comparison tools.
(23) Independent comparison tools including websites are an effective means for customers to assess the merits of different energy offers available on the market.
The revised Guidance also incorporates two sets of self-regulatory principles agreed among stakeholders:one will support comparison tools to better comply with the Directive and the other will help the enforcement of unfair commercial practices rules against misleading and unfounded environmental claims.
Independent comparison tools, including websites, are an effective means for smaller customers to assess the merits of the different energy offers that are available on the market.
Member States shall appoint a competent authorityto be responsible for issuing trust marks for comparison tools that meet the requirements set out in paragraph 1, and for ensuring that comparison tools bearing a trust mark continue to meet the requirements set out in paragraph 1.
Comparison tools fulfilling the requirements in points(a) to(g) shall, upon request by the provider of the tool, be certified by competent authorities in coordination, where relevant, with national regulatory authorities.
The work started by the Commission on principles for comparison tools, such as independence and impartiality, should urgently yield concrete policy measures, including guidelines for regulators and businesses.
(238) Independent comparison tools, such as websites, are an effective means for end-users to assess the merits of different providers of publicly available electronic communications services other than number-independent interpersonal communications services, and to obtain impartial information, in particular by comparing prices, tariffs, and quality parameters in one place.
Member States shouldbe able to determine how often comparison tools are required to review and update the information they provide to end-users, taking into account the frequency with which providers of internet access services and of publicly available▌interpersonal communications services, generally update their tariff and quality information.▌.
(267) Independent comparison tools, such as websites, are an effective means for end-users to assess the merits of different providers of internet access services and interpersonal communications services, where provided against recurring or consumption-based direct monetary payments, and to obtain impartial information, in particular by comparing prices, tariffs, and quality parameters in one place.
Member States shouldbe able to determine how often comparison tools are required to review and update the information they provide to end-users, taking into account the frequency with which providers of publicly available electronic communications services other than number-independent interpersonal communications services, generally update their tariff and quality information.