Exemplos de uso de ASA classification em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
However, there was no difference in ASA classification p=0.36.
The ASA classification system was revolutionary in its field.
Another major criterion is patients' physical status according to ASA classification.
The ASA classification of the patients varied between three 2.3%, four 81.4% and five 16.3.
In the multivariate analysis,only the ASA classification maintained statistical significance p< 0.05.
ASA classification and BMI were compared with total pain score using the abovementioned scale.
A significant percentage of the patients had ASA classification two and three, intermediate anesthetic risk.
In the ASA classification, 16 53.4% patients were classified as ASA 1, followed by 14 46.6% classified as ASA 2.
Despite these limitations our CDR outperformed the ASA classification- which was validated for this outcome prediction.
Disagreements in ASA classification between the anesthesiologist and other physicians was another data evaluated in this study.
The study groups were also compared by chi-square test with respect to age, height, body weight,gender, ASA classification.
The ASA classification given by anesthesiologists showed that 77.4% of patients had mild or severe systemic disease ASA II and III.
Multiple logistic regression was carried out, including the following variables: gender; age;educational level; ASA classification; and surgery duration.
Patients with ASA classification four presented a lower median of hours of hospital stay compared to patients with ASA score one, two and three.
Chohan and Afshan administered unilateral spinal anesthesia prior to lower-limb surgery in elderly patients with ASA classification of III or IV average age, 60.
The measures of prognostic validity for ASA classification were also calculated, in order to compare with the results of Farwell et al.; these values are shown in Table 6.
The 402 patients included in this study had a mean age of 51.57±16.73, 216 54% were female,234 58.2% with ASA classification two and 95 23.6% with ASA classification three.
The significant difference in the distribution of the ASA classification may be explained by the fact that the presence of RA already increases the classification to at least ASA 2.
It was found that as the hours of stay of a patient in the post-anesthesia care unit increase the greater the degree of dependence on nursing care and the higher the ASA classification.
The Chi-Square test was used to analyze data obtained for gender, ASA classification, and the number of patients in which successful unilateral spinal anesthesia was achieved.
Regarding the ASA classification, the results showed that 33 38.8% patients of the sample were classified as ASA I patient in normal health, however, of these participants, three developed SSI.
Patients' data collected were related to the group they belonged to CG or EG, gender, age,comorbidities, ASA classification, body temperature at the time of entry and exit from the OR.
Not using the ASA classification could have interfered with the variables of the Tobin index, length of stay in the post-anesthetic care unit PACU, and clinical intercurrences after extubation.
Patient characteristics are shown in Table I. There was no difference between groups regarding age,weight, ASA classification, length of time as smokers, or number of cigarettes consumed daily Table I.
A retrospective study that evaluated the incidence of anesthetic-surgical deaths within the first 24 hours in a university hospital concluded that most deaths occurred among patients with an ASA classification of three or higher.
Age p 0.901, height p 0.852, body weight p 0.112,gender p 0.714, ASA classification p 1000, surgery duration p 0.351 and Tourniquet time p 0.654 of the patients are presented in Table 1.
The ASA classification assesses the severity of systemic diseases, physiological dysfunctions and anatomical abnormalities; and does not directly approach the body temperature, but is related to the disorder carried by the patient, which can increase or reduce his/her body temperature.
The model was also adjusted for covariates including age, weight, height,sex, ASA classification, diagnosis, intraoperative morphine, intraoperative fentanyl, surgery time, anesthesia time, and estimated blood loss.
ASA classification, unlike other studies, was significant as a risk factor for fistula development in the univariate and multivariate analysis, which demonstrates that the presence of pre-operative co-morbidities and functional status of the patient have a major importance in the development of intraand post-surgical complications.
The exclusion criteria were:patients with active infection in another site, with ASA classification above III, who had died before the stipulated follow-up period and loss of follow-up in ambulatory or on telephone contact.