Exemplos de uso de Applicant had em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
It also examined whether the applicant had used any other subsidy schemes, or had received ad hoc subsidies in relation to the product concerned.
Although toxicity data for the target animal may be scarce,the adverse effects connected to ephedrine treatment are well known from human use, and the applicant had provided some post-marketing information regarding the use in dogs.
On 9 June 2005, since the applicant had not paid the amount mentioned in the contested measure, the Commission sent it a letter of formal notice.
It follows, by contrast, from paragraph 16 of those grounds that the Board of Appeal found that,following the adoption of the decision of the Opposition Division, the applicant had limited the goods covered by its application for registration to bath gowns falling within Class 25.
The Commission decision had found that the applicant had infringed Article 65(1) of the ECSC Treaty and had ordered it to cease the in fringements forthwith.
Although the Commission does not, in the contested decision, exclude the possibility of the applicant reducing its charges for wholesale access(recitals 17, 163 and 206),it confines its analysis in that decision to the question whether the applicant had genuine scope to increase its retail prices recitals 164 to 175.
Thus, on 4 September 1970, the applicant had applied to the competent German authority for an import licence for a consignment of preserved Chinese mushrooms which was in free circulation in the Netherlands.
Since those decisions must be regarded as defining a position for the purposes of Article 175 of the Treaty, the applicant had no further interest in obtaining a declaration of failure to act since the failure to act was no longer subsisting.
On 4 August 2004, at a time when the applicant had already lodged the present action, the Commission sent it a second reminder once again calling on it to pay the amount mentioned in the contested measure by 6 September 2004 at the latest.
It follows from all the foregoing that the Commission was entitled to find in the contested decision(recitals 164 and 199) that the applicant had sufficient scope during the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2001 to end entirely the margin squeeze complained of in that decision.
In this case, the applicant had been dismissed, on conclusion of the procedure provided for by Article 51 of the Sta¥ Regulations for dealing with incompetence, and sought the suspension of the operation of the decision dismissing her.
It follows from all the foregoing that the Commission was entitled to find in the contested decision that the applicant had sufficient scope from 1 January 2002 to reduce the margin squeeze identified in that decision by increasing its charges for ADSL access services.
As to the correspondence exchanged by the Commission and UCLAF with the Turkish authorities and the national customs authorities of the Member States,the Court held that there was no evidence to suggest that the Commission based the contested decision on any documents other than those in the file to which the applicant had access at the consultation on 6 August 2002.
In the context of establishing the export price, the applicant had transmitted to the Commission, a few days before the on-the-spot verification, a list of its export sales to the Community, indicating for each transaction the expenses allegedly incurred.
Finally, in the fourth place,it is necessary to consider whether the Commission has established to the requisite legal standard in the contested decision that the applicant had sufficient scope in the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2001 to‘[avoid] the margin squeeze' recital 164.
Moreover, the Commission notes that the applicant had the right to take part in the formal investigation procedure by formulating observations, as an interested party which had been invited to do so in the decision to open the formal investigation procedure see paragraph 7 above.
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM v COMMISSION that, by decision of 19 December 2002, RegTP had even rejected an application by the applicant for an increase in its retail charges beyond the ceiling prescribed, even though,in support of the application, the applicant had referred to the procedure initiated by the Commission as justification for exceeding that ceiling.
According to the contested decision(recitals 164 and 199), the applicant had sufficient scope to end the margin squeeze in the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2001 by increasing its retail charges for access to analogue and ISDN lines.
In recitals 206 and 207 to the contested decision, the Commission characterised the infringement as serious, not as very serious, in respect of the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2001 on the grounds, first, that the weighted method applied to determine the margin squeeze was new andhad not previously been the subject of a formal decision and, second, that the applicant had steadily reduced the margin squeeze since 1999 at least.
In this connection the Court of First Instance found as a result of its assessments relating to proof of the infringement that the applicant had committed a breach of the Community competition rules of lesser duration than was specified in the decision and that therefore the amount of the fine imposed should be reduced.
Summary of CHMP' s Opinion The CHMP noted that the applicant had provided the following arguments to support the endometrial safety of Activelle 0.5 mg/ 0.1 mg: a. the proliferative effect of unopposed oestrogens on the endometrium is dose-dependant, b. this proliferative effect of unopposed oestrogens is time-dependant, especially for high oestrogen doses, c. continuous combined therapy over long duration is more protective that sequential therapy in the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma.
The call for tenders published in the OJ, which was the only legally binding text in caseof a dispute,furthermore added to the possibilities offered to applicants in this respect byproviding that an applicant had“to submit proof to show that he had fulfilled his obligations regarding taxes and social security contributions in accordance with the legislationof the country where he is established”point 14 b.
For if, by exercising its discretion, the applicant had ended the margin squeeze as from 1998, it would have sufficed for the applicant to maintain the balance between its charges for wholesale access and its retail charges in order to avoid the margin squeeze identified in the contested decision throughout the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2001.
In those circumstances, it is necessary to consider whether the Commission was correct to find in the contested decision that the applicant had sufficient scope during the two periods identified in paragraphs 94 and 95 above to increase its retail prices, so as to end or reduce the margin squeeze identified in the contested decision.
The main prerequisites for a licence include that the applicant had practised acupuncture for at least 10 years and had a valid license as"a doctor of acupuncture, herb physician, or doctor of traditional Chinese medicine duly issued by the licensing board of any foreign country.
The Court of First Instance considered that in the present case there were no factors such as to prove that the documents to which the applicant had been given access had been selected by the Commission in such a way as to prevent the applicant from proving that by reason of the status of its employee at the meetings of the polypropylene producers, it had not participated in the infringement.
Like the Court of First Instance,the Court of Justice considered that, if the applicant had acted with normal diligence and if thefunction of its internal departments had not been defective, the fact that the form headed'Acknowledgement of receipt/Accuse de reception' was included in the envelope wouldnot have given rise to any confusion on its part.
An applicant has forwarded to the competent authority of one of the Member States.
Applicant has a head shaped like a trapezoid.
It is important that the applicant has experience in childcare.