Exemplos de uso de Behalf of producers em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Private operators, organisations acting on behalf of producers or recognised organisations, provided that their actions are of common interest.
Art 37: Collective actions: must be implemented with the active support of operators themselves orby organisations acting on behalf of producers or other organisations recognised by the Member State….
The request was submitted by Eurometaux on behalf of producers representing more than 45% of the Community production of zinc oxides.
Art 37: Collective actions: must be implemented with the active support of operators themselves orby organisations acting on behalf of producers or other organisations recognised by the Member State….
The request was submitted by Eurometaux on behalf of producers representing a major proportion of the Community production of zinc oxides.
The investigation was initiated at the request lodged by the Defence Committee of the Seamless Steel Tube Industry of the European Union on behalf of producers representing more than 75% of the total Community production.
Finally, on behalf of producers, processors and all of us, I hope that this reform achieves more of the objectives set for it than the last one.
The request was submitted by the Lighting Industry and Trade in Europe(‘LITE') on behalf of producers and importers of CFL-i in the Community the‘applicant.
This reserve must be non-transferable and used exclusively on behalf of producers whose right to take up production again will be affected as a result of accession.
Whereas it is advisable to define the term'Community industry' and to provide that parties related to exporters may be excluded from such industry and to define the term'related'; whereas,it is also necessary to provide for anti-dumping action to be taken on behalf of producers in a region of the Community and to lay down guidelines on the definition of such region;
The request was lodged on 6 March 2006 by Euro Alliages on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, i.e. 100% of the Community production of silicon.
Following the publication, on 24 February 2000, of the notice of the impending expiry of the anti-dumping measures in force on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia(8), the Commission received a request for an expiry and an interim review pursuant to Article 11(2) and(3)of the basic Regulation, lodged by EFMA on behalf of producers representing a major proportion of Community production of ammonium nitrate"applicant Community producers. .
The request was submitted by Ring Alliance Ringbuchtechnik GmbH on behalf of producers representing a major proportion of the Community production of certain RBMs‘the applicants.
The proceeding was initiated as a result of a complaint lodged in April 2002 by the Committee of European CD-Rs Manufacturers("CECMA"),acting on behalf of producers representing a major proportion of the total Community production of CD-Rs.
The request was lodged by the Committee of European Diskette Manufacturers("Diskma") on behalf of producers whose combined output constitutes a major proportion of the total Community production of 3,5" microdisks"the product concerned.
Following the publication in October 1998(3) of a notice of the impending expiry of the measures in force,the Commission received a request for a review lodged by the European Chemical Industry Council(CEFIC) on behalf of producers representing a major portion of the Community production of silicon carbide hereafter"the applicant Community producers. .
The request was lodged on 23 December 1998 by the European Association of Potash Producers(hereinafter the"applicant") on behalf of producers, whose collective output of potash constitutes about 99% of the Community production of this product, i.e. a major proportion of the total Community production pursuant to Articles 4(1) and 5(4)of the basic Regulation.
This followed a complaint from the European Confederation of the Footwear Industry on 17 May on behalf of producers representing a major proportion of total EU production.
The complaint was lodged on 31 May 2006 by CEFIC("the complainant") on behalf of producers representing 100% of the total Community production of peroxosulphates.
The interim review was initiated as a result of a request lodged in April 2003 by the Association of Plastic Manufacturers in Europe(APME)(‘the applicant') on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 80%, of the total Community production of PET.
This request was lodged by the European Fertilizer Manufacturers Association(EFMA)(‘the applicant') on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50% of the total Community production of UAN.
These requests were lodged by the European Chemical Industry Council(‘CEFIC') on behalf of producers representing 100% of the total Community production of SiC.
The request was lodged by the European Confederation of Iron and Steel Industries(Eurofer)(the applicant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion of the Community production of the product concerned.
The request was lodged on 18 August 2003 by SX Bürowaren andRingbuchtechnik Handelsgesellschaft GmbH on behalf of producers representing 100% of the Community production of certain ring binder mechanisms.
These requests were lodged by the Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques(CIRFS) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50%,of the total Community production of PSF.
The request was lodged on 10 February 2005 by the European Association of Potash Producers(APEP)("the applicant") on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 99%, of the total Community production of potassium chloride.
The complaint was lodged on 11 October 2004 by the Liaison Committee of European Wire Rope Industries(EWRIS)(the complainant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50%,of the total Community production of certain iron or steel ropes and cables.
The request was lodged on 28 April 2006 by the Liaison Committee of EU Wire Rope Industries(EWRIS)("the applicant") on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50%,of the total Community production of certain iron or steel ropes and cables.
The complaint was lodged on 17 May 2005 by the European Confederation of the Footwear Industry(CEC)("the complainant") on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 30%,of the total Community production of certain footwear with protective toecap.
The request was lodged on 26 September 2005 by the Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques(CIRFS)("the applicant") on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50% of the total Community production of polyester staple fibres.