Exemplos de uso de Cost of inaction em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
So we must consider the cost of inaction!
The cost of inaction is too high for us to accept.
This is much less than the up to EUR 60 per week that is the cost of inaction.
The cost of inaction is far higher than action' he warned.
Going on even the most optimistic assumptions of the Stern Report, the cost of inaction is more than 10 times what we are now proposing.
The cost of inaction is too high for us to accept, and I hope that we can agree on this point.
Some of these actions will have a certain cost, but this cost is not prohibitive- andis certainly much less than the cost of inaction.
However, the cost of inaction will greatly exceed the cost of the mitigation measures required.
In this context further cost-effective ways of implementing EU decisions in the field of climate change and the potential cost of inaction should be considered.
Evaluations of the cost of inaction and cost-effectiveness of actions in mental health are fundamental.
In 2011 we will…• support environmental reporting within the European Neighbourhood Policy;• complete a cost of inaction related valuation of damage to ecosystems services and human welfare.
The economic cost of inaction and investments derailed by water and climate impacts could be very high.
The World Bank Group and the wider global community need to confront the complex institutional andsocial challenges in these fragile states, because the cost of inaction is high and the reward of well-designed interventions is great.
Firstly, the fact that the cost of inaction can be higher than the cost of a prevention policy.
In its communication of 27 October 1992, the Commission proposed a'test of comparative efficiency' between Community action and that of the Member States,followed by a test of proportionality which would evaluate the scale of the operation, the cost of inaction, the possible limits on action at national level.
Scientific evidence shows that the cost of inaction will be far higher than the cost of converting to low carbon technologies and practices.
The economic cost of inaction could be very high, and governments should protect their investment against derailment by future climate change.
Before moving to offensive action, the United States would exhaust all other options,weigh the risk of action against the cost of inaction and“act in a way that reflects our values and strengthens our legitimacy, seeking broad international support wherever possible,” the report said.
There is clearly a cost involved in upskilling staff, but the cost of inaction is, in most cases, greater. The social partners can promote learning environments by theimplementation of personnel and organisational measures for amodern age-management.
Further consider cost-effective ways of implementing EU decisions in the field of climate change,and the potential cost of inaction, in particular medium and longer term emission reduction strategies, including targets, on the basis of a cost benefit analysis prepared by the Commission, taking account both of environmental and competitiveness considerations;
Effective and balanced impact assessments,including the costs of inaction and long-term effects;
Sometimes, the costs of inaction- of permitting financial risks to develop- are simply too high.
Given that costs of taking remedial action can be higher than taking timely innovative,preventative action, the costs of inaction are also being examined.
Lastly, the costs of inaction and the inevitable resulting pollution are also extremely difficult to estimate.
The costs of inaction and the mal-action of business as usual are amassing a mountain of social and ecological liabilities.
The Stern report made clear that combating climate change makes economic sense, in addition to the numerous societal benefits,because the costs involved are lower than the costs of inaction.
The challenge of climate change is assuming ever greater importance as its long-term consequences become clearer andnew information from recent studies shows that the costs of inaction for the global economy will significantly outweigh the costs of action.
The European Commission should be invited to continue its analysis of costs and benefits of reduction strategiesenabling greenhouse gas concentrations to remain well below 550 ppmv CO2 equivalent, including costs of inaction, taking into account both environmental and competitiveness considerations.
The Council(ECOFIN) RECALLS that the estimates of the global costs of tackling climate change by a coordinated international response remain far lower than the costs of inaction, provided that swift action is taken to make use of the lowest cost abatement opportunities available internationally.
By raising awareness of the costs of inaction, we will have an opportunity to focus political opinion on the need for unprecedented action to halt the loss of biodiversity.