Exemplos de uso de Cranial capacity em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Below-average cranial capacity.
The cranial capacity was about 375 to 500 cc.
The underlying brain architecture was also continuous-our cranial capacity didn't suddenly increase by two orders of magni- tude.
The cranial capacity falls within the normal range for human beings.
Homo erectus, who lived between 1,6 million and300,000 years ago and had a cranial capacity of 850 to 1,000 cc.
Now the average cranial capacity of modern man-- hit it, would you?
It is an adult(the third molars were completely erupted andshowed signs of wear) with an estimated cranial capacity of only 510 cc.
It has a cranial capacity of 1,500 cubic centimeters, 20% greater than normal.
This species was succeeded by Homo erectus, who lived between 1,6 million and300,000 years ago and had a cranial capacity of 850 to 1,000 cc.
And the average cranial capacity of Neanderthal man is 1800cc.
Another dogma I will try to debunk here is that the hominins that crafted the first tools had superior cranial capacity to their predecessors, incapable of flaking.
The cranial capacity of"A. garhi" measures 450cc, the same size as other australopithecines.
Modern man,“homo sapiens”,was a creature with enlarged cranial capacity related to a hominidic race that developed in Africa about 100,000 years ago.
The cranial capacity is estimated to be 780 cubic centimetres(48 cu in), somewhat similar to that of its contemporary, Java Man.
The bad news is that the first stone flakers Australopithecus garhi Figure 8 had a cranial capacity very similar to that of their earliest bipedal ancestors: 450cm.
That said, cranial capacity varies widely among the earliest Homo specimens.
One way or the other, the first members of our genus Homo ergaster/ erectus Figure 14 seem to have also been the first to display cranial capacity significantly larger than our predecessors, the australopithecines table 2.
Hmm… his cranial capacity is 22 percent smaller than ours and he appears to be lacking a dilitus lobe.
In sum, the two lineages behaved in ways whose level of complexity required theuse of language and symbols, as should be expected from cranial capacity- Neandertal brains were in fact larger than ours.
Your kind has neither the cranial capacity… nor the opposable digits to operate a firearm.
Since many times the company paying the money out agrees on a structured over time settlement, the plaintiff of course is a lowly human andhas lots of desires for riches and he has little if any cranial capacity to understand the enormous gift the courts have grated him a….
Based on their cranial capacity, I would say they're no more advanced than most endotherms we've.
The only human fossils found before the discovery of Java Man in the 1890s were either of anatomically modern humans or of Neanderthals that were too close,especially in the critical characteristic of cranial capacity, to modern humans for them to be convincing intermediates between humans and other primates.
Likewise, increased cranial capacity generally coincides with the more sophisticated tools occasionally found with fossils.
When the cranial capacity of the megadonts from 2.5 million years ago is compared with that of the last descendants, dated to around a million BP, no significant neurocranial expansion can be noted, unlike in the genus Homo.
The evidence amassed by scientists about it comes indirectly from the observation of the increase in the size of cranial capacity, of artifacts produced as a result of human intelligence, such as the manufacturing of tools and cooperative hunting and war, the use of fire and cooking, art and burial of the deceased, and a few other things.
Humans alive today vary in cranial capacity from about 700 cc to 2200 cc, with no relation of brain size to intelligence.
It assumed that such characteristics as cranial capacity, brain weight, and shape of the cerebral circumvolutions, among other features, could provide information on the moral and intellectual aspects of an individual and, on a broader plane, on the chances of improving human societies.
For example, in the early years of the decade 2000, three specimens of this group were found in the Republic of Georgia in the Caucasus, with cranial capacities varying from 600 to 780 cm, all adults.
No sooner had we understood that knapping had not, at least in the beginning, involved any preconceived mental template, and that even chimpanzees could be taught to knap stone,than we also realized that pre-Homo hominins, with cranial capacities much like the great apes, would also have been capable of knapping, given the right motor capacity. .