Exemplos de uso de Cross-sectional cohort study em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Cross-sectional cohort study.
This was an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional cohort study.
We ran a cross-sectional cohort study in a tertiary care center for mouth breathing patients.
In 1992, an investigation on physicians' remuneration in public and private general hospitals in Belo Horizonte State of Minas Gerais, based on an intentionalsample of 60 physicians, and in 2002, a cross-sectional cohort study supported by a random sample of physicians around 300 in Salvador State of Bahia, showed the predominance of mixed forms of remuneration among physicians and their simultaneous public and private integration.
A contemporary cross-sectional cohort study to assess the precision and accuracy of a diagnostic tool.
Such a situation was also observed in a cross-sectional cohort study involving 1,309 mother-child pairs.
A cross-sectional cohort study included 77 unrelated hearing loss patients, of which 38 were male and 39 were female.
Methodology: this is a descriptive cross-sectional cohort study conducted in icus of hospitals in the metropolitan area of recife.
This cross-sectional cohort study was carried out from November to December 2013 and included 90 nurses who worked at 20 BHUs located in the city of Diadema SP.
This is a descriptive cross-sectional cohort study, with retrospective data collection and quantitative analysis.
In a cross-sectional cohort study in Brazil, respiratory function, functional capacity, and QoL were investigated in 18 patients who had been treated for pulmonary MDR-TB for 18 months or more.
This was a descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional cohort study conducted in public schools of the city of São José do Rio Preto, state of São Paulo, Brazil.
A cross-sectional cohort study was undertaken of 18 AN/AD children with cochlear implants for at least six months that participated in two different cochlear implant programs in São Paulo state.
The present investigation is a cross-sectional cohort study, developed after approval by the Ethics in Research Committee, under protocol 11447/2007.
A cross-sectional cohort study was performed involving pregnant women, from the first to third trimester of pregnancy, attending the prenatal low-risk program at the Center for Women Care CWC of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira IMIP who agreed to participate in the study. .
The present paper represents a contemporary, cross-sectional cohort study, in which the variable studied is the NIPF behavior in a population of healthy individuals and individuals with rhinitis.
Methodology: a cross-sectional cohort study was conducted from january to december 2014, attendend by 712 pregnant women and 235.
This is an observational, cross-sectional cohort study that used statistical tools for the analysis of the level of significance of 5.
This contemporary cross-sectional cohort study was performed after approval by the institution's research ethics committee, under protocol number 1635/09.
Since this was a cross-sectional cohort study involving a population of patients with respiratory symptoms, the data obtained cannot be extrapolated to the general population.
This is a contemporary cross-sectional cohort study. Twenty-one unilateral canal wall down mastoidectomy patients without dizziness were enrolled 6 males and 15 females.
Methods: a cross-sectional cohort study included 20 women with cpp diagnosis, who were recruited at the hospital of the university of são paulo, and 20 healthy volunteers control group.
This is a multicentric cross-sectional cohort study which was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Institutions where the study was carried out, according to the following protocols.
This is a historical cross-sectional cohort study, carried out with the charts of 6 patients seen in the stomatology ward of our institution, between February of 2009 and January of 2012.
This was a prospective cross-sectional cohort study with a non-probabilistic, intentional sample performed in the period from March 2005 to September 2007 in the Santa Casa Hospital Complex.
A historical cross-sectional cohort study was carried out at a tertiary level hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, from December 2008 to the present date, August 2010.
This is a cross-sectional cohort study, undertaken with 335 children and adolescents submitted to PIP with over-the-needle catheters, hospitalized in the children's surgical unit of a university hospital in São Paulo.
A prospective cross-sectional cohort study evaluated 66 male and female children, of which 36 were term neonates TN and 30 were premature neonates PN according to the World Health Organization classification.