Exemplos de uso de Individuals with sensorineural hearing loss em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
The percentage of less than 88% accuracy is found in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss 7.
However the group of individuals with sensorineural hearing loss had worse results in the recognition of the message.
These criteria were adopted,since the percentage below 88% correct is found in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.
In individuals with sensorineural hearing loss of moderate to profound predominance of cochlear evidenced by the absence of otoacoustic emissions.
This study aimed to identify the prevalence of ANSD in a group of individuals with sensorineural hearing loss seen at an auditory health care center.
Individuals with sensorineural hearing loss usually require treatment based on self-care skills, such as the effective use of hearing aids HA.
Costa& Iório 2006 presented a comparative study about the benefits of non-linear amplification,for speech recognition, in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.
The literature reports that individuals with sensorineural hearing losses for high-pitched sounds have difficulties in speech recognition due to decreased acoustic information.
Fernandes, Gil, Santa Maria and Azevedo present the fourth study on Evoked Brainstem Response by bone in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.
Methods: we selected 15 individuals with sensorineural hearing loss from mild to moderate degree, new users of bilateral hearing aids, aged between 60 and 75 years.
This index is lower than that reported by international studies,which report the occurrence of change retrocochlear in 11% to 15% of individuals with sensorineural hearing loss 15,17.
Individuals with sensorineural hearing loss have better performance in tests that evaluate speech recognition when the words are presented at a more comfortable hearing level.
The p-value obtained using the non-parametric Wilcoxon statistical test showed no significant differences between the two devices,for normal hearers and individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.
Individuals with sensorineural hearing loss have more difficulties in perceiving the speech in noisy environments than individuals with normal hearing or with conductive or mixed hearing loss. .
Another study, already mentioned, has brought the same findings:the SSW test was performed by individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, some without hearing aid fitting and some already wearing HA for from 4 months to 6 years.
For individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, loss configuration should be symmetrical, i.e. hearing loss was considered symmetrical when the difference was equal to or smaller than 10 dB HL between the hearing threshold averages 500; 1,000; and 2,000 Hz observed for the right and left ears.
In a research21 that usedthe PSL 13 test with a methodology similar to the one used in this study, a change of 1 dB in the S/R relation in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss resulted in a change of 11,2% in speech intelligibility.
Individuals with sensorineural hearing loss which presented characteristics of retrocochlear change during BAER testing were excluded, being considered the following results to characterize the amendment change: increased of latency of waves III and/or V with increasing values of interpeak interval I-III and/or IV and/or III-V; lack of incompatible waves with behavioral thresholds, presence of only wave I.
In Table 3,it is found the average values of wave V latencies in ms obtained by the 50dBnNA bone in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, according to the variable side of the ear,with no statistically significant difference.
However, it was found that the latency in the study group OD OE 6.81 ms and 6.69 ms was equivalent to the value obtained in normal hearing subjects OD OE 6.82 ms and 6.90 ms,agreeing with another study that compared the latencies of ABR by AC among individuals with sensorineural hearing loss and people with normal hearing. .
In 2012, Korczak et al. reported that there is no difference between ASSR and PT thresholds in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss compared with those with normal hearing, both in the stimulation of a single frequency and with multiple simultaneous frequencies.
Intending to assess the improvement in hearing, with the help of a hearing aid, in relation to balance and fear of falling among elderly with bilateral hearing loss, a clinical and experimental study was carried out involving 56 elderly individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, subjected to the use of hearing aids.
However, it is worth noticing that, for some authors(9, 10),the decreased threshold difference dues to the recruitment phenomenon found in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, as well as that this phenomenon can be prevented from happening by amplifying the grand-averaging in the acquisition protocol.
Electrophysiological responses absolute and interpeak latencies in 30 ears from the other group of 15 individuals with sensorineural hearing loss experimental group 3 in the ND were compared with electrophysiological responses obtained in the same individuals using the traditional device gold group 2.
Given the above,the general objective of this study was to characterize the results of ABR by bone conduction in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, comparing the responses of the study group with aurally normal individuals. .
Recent progress in the treatment of children with hearing impairment has enabled the access to the auditory perception of speech sounds for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, thus providing valuable benefits for communication and quality of life of these people.
Considering that the peripheral hearing loss and the type of stimulus used in the assessment can influence the communication performance of individuals in different everyday environments, whether in favorable or unfavorable listening situations,it is hypothesized that individuals with sensorineural hearing loss show better speech recognition when exposed to linguistic stimuli of great redundancy associated with other sensory modalities and worse performance in activities involving auditory closure skills.
A total of 2,292 individuals diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss with ages ranging from zero to 95 years were assessed.
Group 2: 10 individuals with flat sensorineural hearing loss of moderate to moderately severe.
According to Table 2,the latency of wave V by bone conduction in electrophysiological thresholds in individuals with mild sensorineural hearing loss in the right ear was 7.51 ms and 7.32 ms for the left ear, presenting no statistically significant difference.