Exemplos de uso de More stringent guide em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
The situation is different for compliance with the more stringent guide values.
Eight complied with the more stringent guide values, giving a compliance rate of 40%, which is particularly low;
Almost all the coastal bathing sites in Cyprus, France, Greece andPortugal complied with the more stringent guide values.
The percentage complying with the more stringent guide values was also up on the previous bathing season but remained low.
All six bathing areas in Gibraltar complied not only with the mandatory values but also with the more stringent guide values.
The percentage complying with the more stringent guide values also fell very slightly to 93.3% for the 2003 bathing season.
Almost all the bathing areas complied with the mandatory values while over 80% also met the more stringent guide values.
When we look at compliance with the more stringent guide values, we can see a more pronounced dierence between the‘new' and‘old' EU Member States.
By contrast, compliance with the more stringent guide values fell further this year and now stands at 15.4%, half the level achieved in the 2001 bathing season.
A smaller fall was recorded in the percentage of bathing areas which complied with the more stringent guide values, which dropped to 82.8% for the 2003 bathing season.
The three new bathing areas moni tored during the 2003 bathing season all complied with the mandatory values,while two of them also met the more stringent guide values.
Slight decrease(- 0.7%) in compliance with the more stringent guide values to 88.4% in 2006;
Nine bathing areas which had been complying with the mandatory values laid down by the directive during the 2002 bathing season also complied with the more stringent guide values in 2003.
With quite high rates of compliance with both the mandatory values and the more stringent guide values, it is not unusual to obtain a ratio close to 1.
The situation for the freshwaterbathing areas was ideal, since they'all complied both with the mandatory values laid down in the directive and with the more stringent guide values.
All the bathing areas which complied with the mandatory values and with the more stringent guide values during the 2001 season kept up the same standard during the 2002 bathing season.
In coastal zones a marked deterioration in bathing water quality was observedduring the 2003 season, in the rate of compliance with both the mandatory values and the more stringent guide values set in the directive.
Whether in terms of compliance with the mandatory values or with the more stringent guide values, the results were less than 2% down on the previous bathing season.
What is more, average bathing water quality is quite high, even if there is still room for Improvement in the resultsreported from freshwater areas, especially* in compliance with the more stringent guide values.
Of the bathing areas that were insuciently sampled in the previous year complied with at least the mandatory values or even the more stringent guide values(156) in 2006 and as such these sites account for the overall positive evolution of the water quality.
Bathing water. quality in the coastal zones improved significantly once again compared with the previous bathing season to reach high rates of compliance with both the mandatory values and the more stringent guide values.
Of the 70 bathing areas which complied with the mandatory values but not with the guide values in 2002,a total of 51 also complied with the more stringent guide values this time, while five complied neither with the guide values nor with the mandatory values.
In the freshwater zones, the results were back up to equal the figures obtained in the 2001 bathing season, with all the bathing areas complying withthe mandatory values and 45.5% also meeting the more stringent guide values.
Progress towards themore stringent guide values: While 607 bathing areas which had been complying with the mandatory values during the previous bathing season also complied with the more stringent guide values this time, a smaller number(448) moved in the opposite direction.
While 34 bathing areas which had been complying with the mandatory values in 2002 moved up to comply with the more stringent guide values this year, 39 moved in the opposite direction.
Considerable efforts have been made In the 12 bathing areas which failed to comply with the mandatory values during the 2002 bathing season, 10 of which have been brought up tothe mandatory values and half of which now also comply with the more stringent guide values.
This ratio of almost 1.5,combined with quite high rates of compliance with both the mandatory values and the more stringent guide values, is an extremely positive indicator.
Bathing water quality in coastal areasremained fairly high and stable compared with the previous bathing season, with high rates of compliance with both the mandatory and the more stringent guide values laid down by the directive.
The percentage of freshwater bathing areas complying with only the mandatory values andthe percentage also complying with the more stringent guide values both rose by over 10% to 95.9% and 42.1% respectively.