Exemplos de uso de Patients with normal hepatic function em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
The usually recommended dose in patients with normal hepatic function is 30 mg q.d.
In patients with abnormal hepatic function, serum half-life may be twofold longer than in patients with normal hepatic function.
Treat with same doses as patients with normal hepatic function.
When compared to patients with normal hepatic function, mild hepatic impairment did not alter dose- normalised bortezomib AUC.
Ledipasvir plasma exposure(AUCinf)was similar in patients with severe hepatic impairment and control patients with normal hepatic function.
The pharmacokinetics of TMZ were comparable in patients with normal hepatic function and in those with mild or moderate hepaticimpairment.
No clinically important differences in the clearance of Empliciti were found between patients with mild hepatic impairment and patients with normal hepatic function.
The pharmacokinetics of TMZ were comparable in patients with normal hepatic function and in those with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.
Patients with severe hepatic impairment may have increased plasma concentrations of unbound cobimetinib compared to patients with normal hepatic function see section 5.2.
The reduced dose may be escalated to the dose for patients with normal hepatic function if the patient is tolerating the treatment for at least two cycles see sections 4.4 and 5.2.
The exposure of regorafenib and its metabolites M-2 andM-5 is comparable in patients with mild hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh A) and patients with normal hepatic function.
Compared to patients with normal hepatic function(n=6), eribulin exposure increased 1.8-fold and 3-fold in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively.
Based on a pharmacokinetic analysis of 44 patients with mild hepatic impairment and 330 patients with normal hepatic function osimertinib exposures were similar.
Relative to patients with normal hepatic function, the sofosbuvir AUC0-24 was 126% and 143% higher in moderate and severe hepatic impairment, while the GS-331007 AUC0-24 was 18% and 9% higher, respectively.
Regarding the plasma concentration of TGF-b1,normal levels were found in patients with normal hepatic function, and low levels were observed in patients with hepatic disease.
No modification of vinflunine and DVFL pharmacokinetics was observed in 25 patients presenting varying degrees of hepatic impairment,compared to patients with normal hepatic function.
The study included a control group consisting of 7 HIV-infected patients with normal hepatic function matched with the hepatically impaired patients for age, gender, weight and tobacco use.
Trastuzumab emtansine exposure(AUC) at Cycle 3 after repeated dosing in patients with mild ormoderate hepatic dysfunction was within the range observed in patients with normal hepatic function.
This analysis included patients with normal hepatic function(n=130), and pre-existing mild(n=8), moderate(n=7), or severe(n=5) hepatic impairment according to NCI Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria.
Limited data in patients with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh B)indicate similar exposure as compared to patients with normal hepatic function after a single 100 mg dose of regorafenib.
In a separate pharmacokinetic study,plasma pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment were similar to those observed in patients with normal hepatic function.
It is usually performed in humans with periods of 15 min. of portal triad clamping, interspersed with 5 min. of reperfusion in patients with normal hepatic function and 10 min. of vascular occlusion interspersed with the same 5 min. reperfusion when the liver function is compromised.
Systemic exposures(AUC) of trastuzumab emtansine at Cycle 1 in patients with mild andmoderate hepatic impairment were approximately 38% and 67% lower than that of patients with normal hepatic function, respectively.
The median steady-state Cmax and AUC(0-24) values after administration of 200 mg pazopanib once daily in patients with severe hepatic impairment were approximately 18% and 15%, of the corresponding median values after administration of 800 mg once daily in patients with normal hepatic function.
The steady state pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir in HIV-infected patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment were compared with those of HIV-infected patients with normal hepatic function in a multiple dose study with lopinavir/ ritonavir 400/ 100 mg twice daily.
However in DTC, patients with baseline hepatic impairment had a higher incidence of hypertension and PPE, and a higher incidence of Grade 3 or 4 hypertension, asthenia, fatigue, andhypocalcaemia compared with patients with normal hepatic function.
Following a single ruxolitinib dose of 25 mg in patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment, the mean AUC for ruxolitinib was increased in patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment by 87%, 28% and 65%, respectively,compared to patients with normal hepatic function.