Exemplos de uso de Proponents argue em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Proponents argue that the Euro will lose value if the Greek economy fails.
Proponents argue it may also explain differences between groups.
Proponents argue that the law is necessary to prevent terrorists re-entering the country.
Proponents argue that too many young people are receiving government benefits after school.
Proponents argue that the pipeline is necessary for the U.S. to achieve energy independence.
Proponents argue that the profits corporations generate should be taxed just like citizen's taxes.
Proponents argue that 15 years is too short of a prison term for people serving life sentences.
Proponents argue that fox hunting with dogs is a time honored tradition that supports rural communities.
Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants.
Proponents argue that it is immoral to ban people with pre-existing conditions from getting health insurance.
Proponents argue that the deal prevented jobs from moving overseas and will help grow the U.S. economy.
Proponents argue that it would streamline intelligence amongst member countries and prevent future terrorist attacks.
Proponents argue that Germany has a duty to join its allies in Europe and accept at least 800,000 refugees.
Proponents argue that all immigrants applying to live in Germany should have knowledge about their new country.
Proponents argue that the flag is an important historical symbol that commemorates the state's role in the Civil War.
Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants.
Proponents argue that the deal will grow the economy by giving exporters greater access to the expanding Chinese economy.
Proponents argue that cutting legalizing marijuana will reduce crime by putting drug dealers out of business.
Proponents argue that the ban infringes on individual rights and prevents people from expressing their religious beliefs.
Proponents argue that the subsides are necessary since net farm income has decline by 32% between 2014 and 2015.
Proponents argue that the fighter is necessary for the U.S. military to maintain its edge over foreign adversaries.
Proponents argue that keeping the UK in the EU's customers area will boost the economy by streamlining trade and tourism.
Proponents argue that it would help prevent foreign entities from funding radical mosques in France and prevent terrorism.
Proponents argue that the sanctions are a necessary threat to keep EU members from voting in oppressive authoritarian regimes.
Proponents argue that the military should not be prevented from using torture if they believe it will keep the country safe.
Proponents argue that the jobs and tax revenue created by the companies eventually offset the cost of any awarded incentives.
Proponents argue that the GCSE encourages students to work hard in school and provides clarity for college admissions and employers.
Its proponents argue that it provides a much more natural formal rendering of natural language than the traditional treatments of Frege, Russell and Quine.
However, proponents argue that in terms of Kolmogorov complexity the proposed multiverse is simpler than a single idiosyncratic universe.
Proponents argue that the arcane law disenfranchises millions of Americans from participating in democracy and has an adverse affect on poor communities.