Exemplos de uso de Significantly in both groups em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
The use proportional of pads after treatment was reduced significantly in both groups.
Vascular reactivity was increased significantly in both groups after endothelial damage p< 0.05 Figure 2; Table 1.
Gait initiation parameters improved significantly in both groups at the two moments of the study.
As for the HF component, at baseline it was slightly lower in the C group compared with the Ch group, andduring ILH infusion this component decreased significantly in both groups.
Systolic and diastolic BP increased significantly in both groups during ILH infusion Figures 3a and 3b.
According to the results, after nine months of training andcompetition BMD decreased significantly in both groups in the hip and its sub-regions.
The nasal volume increased significantly in both groups, but was not affected by decongestionants.
Regarding the results obtained from the MIP in our study,decreased significantly in both groups postoperatively compared to preoperative values.
Although PTH values increased significantly in both groups, the increase was significantly higher in the Intervention, when compared to the Control group, after six months of follow-up?PTH 194 versus 92 pg/dL; p< 0.05 Figure 1.
Nevertheless, although the weight increased significantly in both groups during their stay in the neonatal unit, this increase was greater in the IUGR group. .
Pulse transit time to toe changed significantly in both groups of patients after administering epidural anaesthesia, compared to state before administering epidural anaesthesia Mann-Whitney test.
The left ventricle systolic work index decreased significantly in both groups after intoxication, but this reduction was more important in EG than in BG p 0.0451.
Plasma glucose decreased significantly in both groups after insulin bolus; it changed 40 mg/dL on average in both groups. .
Interestingly, the risk of death begins to increase significantly in both groups when the lactate level exceeds 2.0mmol/L. Furthermore, the risk of death is greater among patients with shock.
At the end of 5 years of follow-up, angina as well as positive stress test decreased significantly in both groups. However, in order to obtain such results, the PCI group had to be submitted to an elevated number of new procedures, 24.75% vs 2.85% in the CABG group. .
We also showed that proximal tubule changes, which were seen in the IR group, decreased significantly in both groups treated with dexmedetomidine, and further, erythrocyte extravasation changes decreased significantly in the group administered dexmedetomidine in the reperfusion period.
VO2max significantly increased in both groups after the exercise program.
However, the behavior of the mean arterial pressure was significantly different in both groups.
The rate among whites remained stable or decreased significantly in both educational groups and increased significantly in the black population Table.
It was noted that the gene expression of IL-1beta andIFN-gamma was significantly inhibited in both groups, while the gene expression of PDGF and TGF-beta significantly increased.
Similar to the number of apoptotic bodies, the expression of caspase 3 also significantly increased in both groups at 21 days of culture compared to day 0.
On the other hand, mean arterial pressure andheart rate were significantly higher in both groups at only one min following ECT when compared to baseline values.
The need for rescue doses has significantly decreased in both groups in the second 2.4% cLPB versus 2.6% epidural and third postoperative days 1.2% cLPB versus 1.3% epidural Figure 3.
SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure fasting plasma glucose andhba1c were significantly higher in both groups of diabetic patients p< 0.0001, When compared to the nondiabetic, healthy subjects.
Among them, GLU responded to both treatments, and its concentration was significantly reduced in both groups, although the values were within the normal range at all time points assessed.
When we compared the beginning and end of the swallowing therapy,the ASHA- NOMS Scale showed that the scores obtained at the time of reassessment were significantly higher in both groups, indicating improvement in the swallowing process.
All pregnanolone andbeta-endorphin concentrations significantly increased in both groups.
The perineometer evaluation of PFM strength showed significant improvement in both groups, significantly higher in G1 at 6 months.