Exemplos de uso de Statacorp em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
All analyses were performed on Stata SE 10.1 StataCorp.
STATA version 12.0 StataCorp was used to analyze the data.
Data were merged andanalyzed using Stata software StataCorp.
Data were analyzed using the STATA 8.0 STATACORP, 2004 statistical software package.
We will carry out all analyses using Stata,version 10.0 StataCorp.
As pessoas também se traduzem
The statistical analyses used Stata StataCorp LP, College Station, USA.
All analyzes will be performed using Stata software, relaease 10.0 StataCorp.
The analyses were performed in Stata 12.0 StataCorp LP, College Station, USA.
Statistical analyses were performed using the software STATA 11.0 StataCorp.
Stata StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA and SAS SAS, Cary, NC, USA have also been adopted.
All data analyses were performed using Stata Program 12.1 StataCorp 2011.
All analyses were performed using Stata/SE 8 StataCorp LP, College Station, TX.
Descriptive statistics were applied for data analysis using the program Stata StataCorp.
The data were analyzed using the Stata 11.0 program StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA.
The tested statisticalsignificance level was 5%, and the software Stata StataCorp.
Data was analyzed using Stata version 8.0 StataCorp- College Station, TX, USA.
Stat/Transfer was written by Circle Systems, Seattle, Washington, andmay be purchased through StataCorp.
All analyses were performed in Stata,release 13 StataCorp LP, College Station, USA.
The whole statistical analysis was performed with the Stata 7 software package StataCorp.; Texas, USA.
We used the STATA statistical software package,version 12.0 StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA.
Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS, version 20.0 andStata 7.0 StataCorp.
Data analysis was performed using the program Stata,version 12.0 StataCorp, CollegeStation, TX, USA.
The statistical analyses were performed using the Stata 11.2 software StataCorp, Texas, USA.
The analyses were performed with the STATA statistical program,version 12.0 StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA.
The data analysis was performed using STATA 12 StataCorp LP, USA.
Statistical analysis was conducted with the software STATA, version 11.2 StataCorp, College Station, TX.
Afterwards, this database was transferred to Stata version 8.0 StataCorp LP 2002 software.
All analyses were performed with the 12.0 version of the Stata software StataCorp LP, CollegeStation, Tex.
Data analysis was performed with the Stata statistical software package,version 12.0 StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 statistical analysis software and Stata 9.0 StataCorp, College Station, TX.