Exemplos de uso de Statistical analysis revealed em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
The statistical analysis revealed that the translated version of the EBBS is reliable.
Regarding the reproducibility analysis intraclass correlation, statistical analysis revealed excellent method reproducibility.
The statistical analysis revealed that such version of the Barthel Index is reliable.
Qualitative analysis showed differences among treatments, however, the statistical analysis revealed that the differences are not significant for the sample size.
The statistical analysis revealed statistically significant prevalence of score reduction.
However, when the results obtained of the benefit from the A.P.H.A.B. inventory applied in the phases 4 and 16/18 weeks were compared, the statistical analysis revealed significant statistical difference only at subscale Aversiveness AV, p=0,01.
The statistical analysis revealed that the sentences recognition index was significantly influenced p.
When considering all the data typical and impaired,the results of the statistical analysis revealed that the type of development is significant as for the correct production as for the C omission, but not for the syllable omission, which were the three performed analyses. .
Statistical analysis revealed a tri-modal distribution with three peaks for the concreteness values Figure 1.
For the presence of neurovegetative symptoms andshort duration of dizziness, statistical analysis revealed values that were very close to being significant p 0.071 and 0.061 respectively, probably reflecting the small sample size. The prevalence ratio for neurovegetative symptoms of 2.111 demonstrates that these symptoms are strongly related to vertigo.
Statistical analysis revealed significant difference P 0.001 compared between groups and L-HydroR Glutaraldehyde, as shown in Table 2.
In the 1RM test, the statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the pre- and post-period results of the TDE intervention group.
The statistical analysis revealed that the groups are homogeneous concerning the all the WHOQOL-bref domains.
As to the type of hearing loss,the results from the statistical analysis revealed that 60.78% of the population investigated had sensorineural hearing loss; 14.70% had mixed hearing loss; 2.40% had conductive hearing loss and 22.12% of the individuals had hearing thresholds within normal standards Table 1.
The statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in track 1 and 2 performance.
The statistical analysis revealed this difference 2.3%, which, however, is not clinically relevant.
The statistical analysis revealed that infants who had had their first episode after 7 months, presented a lower rate of recurrence.
The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the sexes, with greater occurrence four or more episodes for males.
Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between groups only in terms of respiratory rate and chest wall mobility at the xiphoid level.
Statistical analysis revealed that there were statistically significant differences between the mean distances at Point 1 compared to other points p< 0.01.
The statistical analysis revealed the statistically significant difference, equally, between the groups, in relation to the ability of tongue vibration.
Statistical analysis revealed to be significant(p=0.0036- Proportion Difference Test) in comparison with liquid consistency versus pasty and solid consistencies.
Furthermore, statistical analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the biochemical structures of RR compared with the non-RR plants.
The statistical analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference on the performance of SDT and SPIN tests between men and women of the study group.
The statistical analysis revealed that the use of a PAD in the contralateral ear significantly influenced p=0.05 the indexes of word or sentence recognition.
The statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation between risk category and medical specialty(p=0.03), as well as between risk category and place of care p=0.001.
Statistical analysis revealed that after surgery both groups presented mean nasalance scores significantly lower than those obtained before surgery.
The statistical analysis revealed no quantitative differences in the parameters velocity, latency and accuracy among subjects with cerebellar diseases and normal subjects.
The statistical analysis revealed that the vocal alteration degree of subjects from the partial laryngectomy group is significant in comparison with the control group, as presented in Table 1.
Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the characteristics of the children for whom this information was missing between 1994 and 1998.