Exemplos de uso de Voice deviation em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
No measure could classify voice deviation severity.
The reduction of voice deviations from moderate to mild shows the positive effect of direct vocal training in this group.
Comparison between groups related to OL of voice deviation presented differences for F0 SD p.
Based on our findings, we can say that there is a correlation between acoustic andauditory-perceptual measurements in quantification of voice deviations.
Simberg found 34.5 mm as cutoff value for the normal variability of the voice deviation, while Yamasaki et al. and Viera found 35.5 mm.
The result found differs from that of this study, which may be related to the evaluated parameters,once that the overall degree of voice deviation.
Concerning the auditory-perceptual assessment of voice, the operators presented mild voice deviation in both conditions before and after a working day.
Moreover, the use of the VPQ is excellent due to its shortness, convenience and also for presenting high intern andone-dimensional consistency to measure the degree of voice deviation.
Some voice deviations are socially accepted and may be part of a singer's vocal quality, whereas others constitute real voice disorders, which may limit his/her career.
However, in post hoc analysis,these measurements did not meet criteria of voice deviation presence and classification.
It is worth highlighting that the patient's perception of this impact depends on individual, social, cultural and professional characteristics, andhence it is not always related to the severity or prognosis of the voice deviation.
Regarding effectiveness of acoustic measurements to predict voice deviation severity, GNE was able to identify ALs, whereas mean F0 was able to measure phonatory tension levels.
The subject that seeks for voice improvement is part of specific public that in majority do not have voice deviations or laryngeal lesions.
In our study, F0 SD presented slight positive relation to OL of voice deviation and phonatory tension level, as well as a weak positive correlation to hoarseness and instability levels.
The utilization of the technological system was enough so that the evaluators could determine the presence and the degree of voice deviation stored at a distance.
The cutoff value found for the normal variation on the voice quality was 35.5 mm; for the degree of voice deviation from slight to moderate was of 35.6 to 50.5 mm; for the moderate to the intense degree was 50.6 to 90.5 mm; and for the intense degree, it was over 90.5 mm.
The vocal behavior substantially differentiates in these two speech language tasks,taking into consideration the difference in the perceptual-auditory evaluation of the type and degree of voice deviation.
The vocal self-assessment also correlates with the V-RQOL scores.These findings suggest that individuals with voice deviation present a negative effect on any social-emotional and/or physical aspects of their lives.
Dysphonic singers are professionals that belong to a special category of voice disorders due to the fact that they have high vocal demand andgreater risk of developing voice deviation.
Regarding the visual analog scale in voice assessment,the literature refers to the indicated value of 34 voice deviation points as the threshold for considering that the individual failed the voice screening.
The weak correlation between the auditory-perceptual analysis and self-assessment indicates that the speech-language pathologist, even technically experienced,may not be able to estimate accurately the impact that the voice deviation produces to the patient.
Regarding predominant voice type, hoarseness 51.3%,n=80 was the most common pattern in patients with voice deviation, followed by air escape 28.8%, n=45, strain 12.8%, n=20, and instability 7.1%, n=11 levels Table 2.
To characterize the sample, a demographic and clinical descriptive statistical analysis of the population was conducted, regarding age,gender, voice deviation type, and presence or absence of vocal complaint.
Studies have reported,that jitter reflects OL of voice deviation, a sensible measure to detect voice quality deviation, which justifies higher values in most deviated voices considering all perceptual features.
Regarding the predominant voice type, instability 26.9%, n 22 and strain 25.6%,n 21 were the prevailing attributes in the children with voice deviation, followed by breathiness 24.3%, n 20 and roughness 23.2%, n 19.
This material was presented to three Speech-Language Pathologist judges, who were experienced in using the GRBASI scale,that identifies the Grade of voice deviation and five independent aspects: roughness R, breathiness B, asteny A, strain S and instability I. All parameters were evaluated using the four-point scale, where 0 means normal or absent, 1 mild, 2 moderate and 3 extreme.
A second reproduction of the study was carried out in Brazil with four evaluators and211 voice samples, with the objective of defining cutoff values of different degrees of the voice deviation in the VAS, according to the values of a four-point NS.
The NS consists of a specific number of equidistant points, such as a scale of four points indicating the degree of voice deviation, where zero corresponds to a voice without deviation and three, to an extreme voice deviation.
This study observed a higher inter-evaluator concordance in the evaluation by the VAS 0.855 than by the NS 0.114 Tables 1 and 2,results in concordance with a study that correlated the two scales in the perceptual-auditory evaluation of the overall degree of voice deviation, observing values of inter-evaluator concordance slightly higher for the VAS 0.849 than for the NS 0.821.
The VAS consists of a straight line, usually of 100 mm length, in which listeners must mark the point corresponding to the extension of the variation of a given characteristic,such as the degree of voice deviation. The VAS is anchored by two verbal descriptors to represent the extremes, being usually anchored by"absence of pain or alteration" in 0 mm in the straight line and"maximum pain or alteration" in 100 mm in the straight line.