Exemple de utilizare a Where an applicant în Engleză și traducerile lor în Română
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Ö Paragraph 1 applies Õ where an applicant.
Where an applicant refuses to approve the content of the report, the reasons for this refusal shall be entered into the applicant's file.
Member States may reduce orwithdraw material reception conditions where an applicant has concealed financial resources, and has therefore unduly benefited from material reception conditions.
Where an applicant submits more than one applicaiton relating to products in the same group, all applications from that person shall be inadmissible.
An applicant's entitlement to material reception conditions under this Directive may be curtailed in certain circumstances such as where an applicant has absconded to another Member State from the Member State where he or she is required to be present.
(b) where an applicant has concealed financial resources and has therefore unduly benefited from material reception conditions.
Article 5(3) has now been extended to permit Member States not to grant subsidiary protection status orrefugee status, where an applicant for international protection files a subsequent application based on circumstances which he has created by his/her own decision since leaving the country of origin.
Where an applicant's adjusted income falls between the two thresholds, there will be a more detailed assessment of their disposable income.
Non-compliance with reporting obligations may also lead to an application being rejected as abandoned(Article 39(1)(f)), and where an applicant does not remain in the Member State where he or she is required to be present, his or her application is dealt with under the accelerated examination procedure(Article 40(1)(g)).
Where an applicant submits more than one application in respect of a quota, all applications from that applicant in respect of that quota shall be considered invalid.
Licence applications shall only be admissible where the applicant declares in writing that he has not submitted and undertakes not to submit any applications, in respect of the current period, concerning products in the same group in the Member State in which his application is lodged orin another Member State; where an applicant submits more than one application relating to products in the same group, all applications from that person shall be inadmissible.
It proposes that where an applicant is held in detention, that person should have the right to a remedy before a national court.
Where an applicant requests a public authority to make environmental information available in a specific form or format(including in the form of copies), the public authority shall make it so available unless.
It is also recalled that, where an applicant shows that there are serious reasons to consider the country not to be safe in his or her particular circumstances, the designation of the country as safe can no longer be considered relevant for him or her.
Where an applicant has been assigned a specific place of residence but has not complied with this obligation, there needs to be a demonstrated risk that the applicant may abscond in order for the applicant to be detained.
For this reason, where an applicant shows that there are serious reasons to consider the country not to be safe in his or her particular circumstances, the designation of the country as safe can no longer be considered relevant for him or her.
Where an applicant lodges a further appeal against a first or a subsequent appeal decision, he or she shall, in principle, not have a right to remain on the territory of Member States(Article 54(5)).
Where an applicant submits an on-line application or falls within the scope of paragraph 5, the biometric data shall be collected, the travel document checked and an interview carried out, if applicable, when the decision on the application is made and the token is issued.
Where an applicant does not meet the prescribed English language proficiency requirements but believes that they can demonstrate the requisite proficiency for admission the University may, at its discretion, consider the application.
Where an applicant wishes to apply for one of the special arrangements mentioned above and the import licence submitted when the import declaration is accepted does not show the name of the non-member country concerned in sections 13 and 14 the levy shall not be reduced by 0,60 ECU per 100 kilograms as provided for by the special arrangement.'.
However, where an applicant is seeking authorization to operate a private warehouse and the customs authorities exceptionally notifies him of its agreement to issue such authorization in writing otherwise than by means of the form referred to in Annex 68/A, the authorization shall take effect on the date of such notification.
Where an applicant as referred to in paragraph 4a is present in the territory of a Member State without having lodged an application there, that Member State shall inform the unaccompanied minor of the right to make an application and give him or her an effective opportunity to lodge an application in that Member State.
Where an applicant does not lodge an application on behalf of his or her spouse or partner as referred to in paragraph 1 within the ten working days referred to in Article 28(1), the spouse or partner shall be given an opportunity to lodge his or her application in his or her own name within another ten working-day period starting from the expiry of the first ten working-day period.
Where an applicant makes a subsequent application without presenting new evidence or findings which significantly increase his or her likelihood of qualifying as a beneficiary of international protection or which relate to the reasons for which the previous application was rejected as inadmissible, that subsequent application should not be subject to a new full examination procedure.
Accordingly, in his view, where an applicant for a post or a tenderer for a contract is excluded from entitlement to compete because of an error on the part of the Community, a court refuses to compensate for the loss of opportunity which results from this for the person concerned because the person concerned cannot count on any right or legitimate expectation that he will obtain the post or contract in question.
Where an applicant refuses to cooperate by not providing the details necessary for the examination of the application and by not providing his or her fingerprints and facial image, and the responsible authorities have properly informed that person of his or her obligations and has ensured that that person has had an effective opportunity to comply with those obligations, his or her application shall be rejected as abandoned in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 39.
Where an applicant does not lodge an application on behalf of his or her dependent adult as referred to in paragraph 1 within the ten working days referred to in Article 28(1), the determining authority shall lodge an application on behalf of that dependent adult if, on the basis of an individual assessment of his or her personal situation, it is of the opinion that the dependent adult may need international protection.
Where an applicant has been granted a status which offers the same rights and benefits under national and Community law as the refugee status by virtue of Directive 2004/83/EC, the applicant may be considered as having an effective remedy where a court or tribunal decides that the remedy pursuant to paragraph 1 is inadmissible or unlikely to succeed on the basis of insufficient interest on the part of the applicant in maintaining the proceedings.
In line with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,the Member State where such an applicant is present should in any case ensure that the immediate material needs of that person are covered.
(b) where the applicant has special needs;