Exemples d'utilisation de Article should be deleted en Anglais et leurs traductions en Français
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This Article should be deleted.
There was also the view that the article should be deleted.
This Article should be deleted.
His delegation suggested that the draft article should be deleted.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that this draft article should be deleted.
The entire article should be deleted.
The experts agreed that paragraph 3 of the article should be deleted.
This Article should be deleted in its entirety.
As it stands, this article should be deleted.
In article 67,all references to"appeal" in the title and throughout the article should be deleted.
Believes that this article should be deleted such sanction as deprivation of liberty.
Also they agreed that paragraph 3 of the article should be deleted.
As such, this draft article should be deleted or at least significantly redrafted.
The procedures under article 16 were too cumbersome, and the article should be deleted.
The representative of Germany suggested that this article should be deleted because it is dealing with procedural and not transportation law.
The question of burden of proof, dealt with in draft article 15,was best included in the rules of procedure, and the article should be deleted.
A view was also expressed that the article should be deleted as it addressed a nationality issue not directly related to a succession of States.
Furthermore, for the reasons set out below,IMF believes this draft article should be deleted in its entirety.
The view of the Special Rapporteur is that the draft article should be deleted, and, if it is thought appropriate, the issue should be referred to in the commentary to draft article 3.
Given the significant difference between extradition and expulsion of aliens,the draft article should be deleted on the ground of prematurity.
A view was also expressed that the article should be deleted as it addressed a nationality issue not directly related to a succession of States. A/CN.4/483, para. 29; A/CN.4/493, comments by Greece.
During the first reading of the draft text at the first session of the Ad Hoc Committee,many delegations were of the view that this article should be deleted, as the matter was covered by or the concept should be treated in conjunction with article 33.
A view was expressed that the article should be deleted because it was difficult to envisage what could motivate a State to take a person into custody without some sort of judicial proceeding, particularly when inter-State assistance could be quickly requested.
The amendment that his delegation had proposed would preserve the rights of the shipper where the carrier was at fault; if it was not accepted,the draft article should be deleted in order not to alter the balance between the contracting parties or to weaken a principle that all delegations wished to preserve.
The representative of Canada stated bluntly that"the draft article should be deleted on the ground of prematurity" since, in his view,"there was insufficient practice to support the conclusion on which revised draft article 8(…) was based.
A widely shared andstrongly supported view was that the draft article should be deleted, as it dealt with substantive matters of contract law that the draft convention should not address.
While some support was expressed for modifying the article as suggested,one view was that the article should be deleted because it either stated what applied anyway or because it was not for a(model) national statute to deal with matters that concerned the hierarchy among legislative acts, an issue that had constitutional implications.