Exemples d'utilisation de Conditions of carriage set out en Anglais et leurs traductions en Français
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
Conditions" means these Conditions of Carriage set out in this document;
The Agency is responsible for, among other things,resolving complaints related to an air carrier's terms and conditions of carriage set out in its tariff.
Our role is to make sure that airlines apply their terms and conditions of carriage set out in their tariffs and that both passengers and airlines have met their respective responsibilities.
Subsection 110(4) of the ATR requires that a carrier operating an international service apply the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its tariff.
Our role is to make sure that airlines apply their terms and conditions of carriage set out in their tariffs and that these terms and conditions are just, reasonable and non-discriminatory.
The Agency further finds that Mr. Kanschat has notestablished that Air Canada, in cancelling his ticket, failed to properly apply, or has inconsistently applied, the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its Tariff.
It is therefore incumbent on the complainants to prove that Air Canada did not properly apply the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its Tariff when it cancelled the complainants' reservation for Flight No. AC949.
Based on the above, the Agency finds that Ms. Nesturi has not established,on a balance of probabilities, that Alitalia failed to properly apply, or inconsistently applied, the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its Tariff.
The Agency is of the opinion that when terms and conditions of carriage set out in policies are inconsistent with those set out in the tariff, there is the potential for misinterpretation and misapplication of the guidelines contained therein.
As indicated in the reasons which follow,the Agency finds that Air Canada properly applied the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its Tariff in this matter, and, accordingly, dismisses the complaint.
The Agency therefore finds that Ms. Dehghani has not established that Sunwing,in refusing to transport her to Cuba on December 15, 2016, failed to properly apply, or has inconsistently applied, the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its Tariff.
As indicated inthe reasons that follow, the Agency finds that Skyservice properly applied the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its Tariff when it refused to transport Mr. Rodriguez-Evora from Toronto to Santa Clara on June 23, 2008.
The Agency finds that Mr. Chomiak did not establish,on a balance of probabilities, that WestJet failed to properly apply, or inconsistently applied, the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its Tariff.
For complaints that a carrier has not applied its fares, rates, charges or terms and conditions of carriage set out in its tariff, Agency staff will review and initially attempt to resolve your complaint through the Agency's informal facilitation process.
The onus is onthe applicant to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that the carrier has failed to properly apply, or has inconsistently applied, the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its Tariff.
The Agency therefore finds that Air Canada properly applied the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its Tariff by imposing an interim ban from travel on Mr. O'Connor following the events at the Fort St. John Airport on November 4, 2006.
As for the burden of proof, the rule is that the complainant, in this case Ms. Enisz, is required to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that Air Canada has failed to properly apply, orhas inconsistently applied, the terms and conditions of carriage set out in the Tariff.
Erroneous factual and/or operational information provided to passengers regarding the conditions of carriage set out in Sunwing's tariff concerning meals, transportation and accommodations in the event of delays, as well as the cancellation policy offered to passengers;
In accordance with a well-established principle on which the Agency relies when considering such applications, the onus is on the applicant to prove,on a balance of probabilities, that the carrier has failed to properly apply, or has inconsistently applied, the terms and conditions of carriage set out in its tariff.
When the Agency determines that a carrier has failed to properly apply the terms and conditions of carriage set out in the carrier's tariff, contrary to subsection 110(4)of the ATR, the Agency has the jurisdiction to direct the carrier to compensate a person for any expenses incurred because of this failure.