Exemples d'utilisation de Paragraph in question en Anglais et leurs traductions en Français
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Here is the paragraph in question.
Hence, he proposed the amendment to delete the paragraph in question.
I fixed the paragraph in question.
As to substance,it would be desirable to maintain the paragraph in question.
The paragraph in question states.
I've deleted the paragraph in question.
The paragraph in question was thus redundant.
I've deleted the paragraph in question.
The paragraph in question looks like this.
I've deleted the paragraph in question.
The paragraph in question did distort that mandate.
You should read the paragraph in question.
The paragraph in question dealt with the question of working languages.
I'll just quote the paragraph in question.
The paragraph in question resulted from a proposal by the United States delegation which that delegation had withdrawn.
He read the paragraph in question.
The CHAIRPERSON replied that that would depend on the content of the paragraph in question.
They suggest that the paragraph in question be removed.
Watson, would you have the kindness to take the paper and to read me the paragraph in question?'?
IRU proposes amending the paragraph in question as follows.
The Group of 77 andChina urged all members to vote in favour of the paragraph in question.
The paragraph in question should either be deleted or extended to cover all human rights instruments.
Referred to in the paragraph in question.
Otherwise, each paragraph in 52.2(1)would have to include the specific articles which apply to the paragraph in question.
I'll just quote the paragraph in question.
The paragraph in question clarified the term“forced eviction” by defining the concept in the context of the general comment.
I'm guessing this is the paragraph in question.
He recalled that when the text of the draftresolution was being prepared, delegations had been invited to suggest organizations for inclusion in the paragraph in question.
Canada points 120 out that other parts of the paragraph in question are supportive of its position.
However, the paragraph in question irresponsibly distorted the language of the Bangkok Declaration on Synergies and Responses: Strategic Alliances in Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, which did not establish shared obligations, but rather affirmed Member States' readiness to improve international cooperation in the fight against terrorism"in a spirit of common and shared responsibility.