Exemples d'utilisation de Party not to deport en Anglais et leurs traductions en Français
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee asked the State party not to deport the complainant to Turkey.
On 16 March 2009, the Committee brought the complaint to the attention of the State party, in accordance with article 22, paragraph 3, of the Convention, and, pursuant to rule 108 ofits rules of procedure(CAT/C/3/Rev.4), requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Ethiopia while the case was under consideration.
The Committee asked the State party not to deport the complainants to Azerbaijan.
On 5 August 2008, pursuant to rule 92 of the Committee's rules of procedure, the Committee, acting through its Special Rapporteur on New Communications and Interim Measures,requested the State party not to deport the author while his case is under consideration by the Committee.
The Committee asked the State party not to deport the complainants to Azerbaijan.
At the same time, the Committee, pursuant to rule 108, paragraph 1, of its rules of procedure,requested the State party not to deport the complainants while their complaint was being considered.
On 4 October 2010,the Committee requested the State party not to deport the author and her two minor children, K.E.R.H. and D.R.H., to Mexico while her case was pending before the Committee.
On 2 June 2008, in accordance with article 92 of the Committee's rules of procedure, the Special Rapporteur on New Communications andInterim Measures requested the State party not to deport the author while his case was under examination by the Committee.
The Committee asked the State party not to deport the author and his daughter to Turkey.
On 19 December 2001, the Committee, acting through its Special Rapporteur on new communications, pursuant to rule 86 of theCommittee's rules of procedure, requested the State party not to deport the author to Jamaica until the Committee had considered the case.
On 8 March 2006,the Committee requested the State Party not to deport the author and her two children, U. S. and I. S., while their case was pending before the Committee.
On 7 July 2004, the author requested the Committee to issue a request for interim measures under rule 86 of its rules of procedure,asking the State party not to deport him while his communication was under consideration by the Committee.
On 9 September 2005,the Committee requested the State party not to deport the complainants to Rwanda while their case is pending before the Committee, in accordance with rule 108, paragraph 1, of the Committee's rules of procedures.
At the same time, the Committee, pursuant to rule 108, paragraph 1, of its rules of procedure,requested the State party not to deport the complainant to India while his complaint was being considered.
On 9 October 2006, the Rapporteur for new complaints andinterim measures requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Azerbaijan while his case is under consideration by the Committee, in accordance with rule 108, paragraph 1, of the Committee's rules of procedures.
When registering the communication on 9 January 2007, and pursuant to rule 92 of its rules of procedure, the Committee, acting through its Special Rapporteur on New Communications and Interim Measures,requested the State party not to deport the authors to the Syrian Arab Republic and China respectively while their case was under examination.
On 13 December 2006,the Rapporteur for new complaints and interim measures requested the State party not to deport the complainants to Azerbaijan while their case is under consideration by the Committee, in accordance with rule 108, paragraph 1, of the Committee's rules of procedures.
At the same time, the Committee, acting in accordance with rule 108, paragraph 9, of its rules of procedure,requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Pakistan pending the Committee's consideration of his complaint.
On 21 April 2010, the Chair, acting on behalf of the Committee,requested the State party not to deport the author to China while his communication is under consideration by the Committee.
On 30 June 2009, in application of rule 114(former rule 108), paragraph 1, of its rules of procedure(CAT/C/3/Rev.5),the Committee requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Sri Lanka while his complaint was being considered by the Committee.
On 16 July 2010, the Chair, acting on behalf of the Committee,requested the State party not to deport the author to China while his communication is under consideration by the Committee.
On 8 September 2010, under former rule 108, paragraph 1, of the Committee's rules of procedure,the Committee requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Ethiopia while her complaint was under consideration by the Committee.
On 27 February 2006, the Rapporteur for New Communications andInterim Measures requested the State party not to deport the author to India while her case is under consideration by the Committee, in accordance with rule 92 of the Committee's rules of procedures.
On 1 March 2013, the Committee granted the interim measures andrequested the State party not to deport the author to Mexico while her case was pending before the Committee.
On 3 July 2007, the Rapporteur for new complaints andinterim measures requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Bangladesh while his case is under consideration by the Committee, in accordance with rule 108, paragraph 1.
Pursuant to rule 108, paragraph 9,of its rules of procedure, the Committee requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Tunisia while his complaint was being considered.
On 6 December 2005, the Rapporteur for New Communications andInterim Measures requested the State party not to deport the author while her case is under consideration by the Committee, in accordance with rule 92 of the Committee's rules of procedures.
At the same time, acting pursuant to article 108, paragraph 1,of its rules of procedure, it asked the State party not to deport the complainant to Pakistan while his complaint was under consideration.
On 31 July 2008, the Rapporteur on new complaints andinterim measures requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Turkey while her case is under consideration by the Committee, in accordance with rule 108, paragraph 1.
On 31 July 2009, under rule 114(former rule 108) of its rules of procedure(CAT/C/3/Rev.5),the Committee requested the State party not to deport the complainant to Ethiopia while her complaint was under consideration by the Committee.