Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that article 57 should, for consistency' s sake, contain a reference to article 8 similar to that in article 59(3)(e)(i).
Fruhmann先生(奥地利)提及第62条时提议,将标题改为"框架协议运作期间[可能的]改动"。
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 62, proposed that the title be amended to read"[Possible] Changes during the operation of a framework agreement".
Fruhmann先生(奥地利)坚持认为,关于投标担保利弊的更平衡解释应反映在《指南》草案中。
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) insisted that a more balanced explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of tender securities should be reflected in the draft Guide.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that the wording of paragraph 6 might be confusing as it referred to article 28(1), whereas the addendum addressed later articles.
Fruhmann先生(奥地利)在提到第(3)款第二句时说,关于可披露的资料类型的问题尚待讨论。
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to the second sentence of paragraph(3), said that the issue regarding the type of information that might be disclosed remained to be discussed.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that the drafting group proposed that the title of chapter VIII be" Challenge proceedings" and that the title of article 63 be" Right to challenge".
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that paragraph 3(c) stated that" collusion would probably violate the law of the State", but should read" collusion would violate the law of the State".
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 14(1), said that the drafting group proposed that the word" in" be inserted before the words" the pre-qualification or pre-selection documents".
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), speaking on behalf of the Western European and other States, proposed that Mr. Wiwen-Nilsson(Sweden) be elected Vice-Chair of the Commission in his personal capacity.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), while expressing support for the proposal, said that the deletion of that phrase would not be sufficient to cover all cases of attempts to circumvent the spirit of the Model Law.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 31(1)(a), proposed the insertion of the words" or repeated" after" indefinite" in the phrase" is expected to arise on an indefinite basis".
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that he had no strong opinion about the footnote to parenthetical subparagraph(1)(k), although, if retained, it should logically become a footnote to paragraph(2).
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) endorsed the proposal made by the delegation of the United States of America regarding an article 20 bis and the proposal made by the delegation of Canada regarding article 21(7).
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), responding to the comments made with respect to article 10(4), said that there were cases where a procuring entity might legitimately require the use of a particular production method.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 16, proposed that subparagraph(1)(c)(ii) be deleted as subparagraph(1)(b) already covered the question of the issuing of a tender security in cases of domestic procurement.
中文
Bahasa indonesia
日本語
عربى
Български
বাংলা
Český
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
עִברִית
हिंदी
Hrvatski
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
한국어
മലയാളം
मराठी
Bahasa malay
Nederlands
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Slovenský
Slovenski
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Tagalog
Turkce
Українська
اردو
Tiếng việt