Examples of using Fruhmann in English and their translations into Chinese
{-}
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Programming
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) questioned the added value of such an addition.
The acting Chairperson, after consulting with Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), suggested that article 32(4) be left as it stood.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that the drafting group had still not completed its work.
The acting Chairperson invited Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) to report on the progress of work in the drafting group.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 62, proposed that the title be amended to read"[Possible] Changes during the operation of a framework agreement".
The acting Chairperson invited Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) to report on the progress being made in the drafting group.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that, in the context of negotiations, the proper term was" skills".
The acting Chairperson invited Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) to report further on the results of the drafting group' s discussions.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) proposed the deletion of the words" the low value of" in article 32(4).
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that the drafting group still needed considerable time in which to complete its work.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that in view of the title of article 21 the wording of paragraph 14 should remain unchanged.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that the proposed instrument should respond to practical needs and should not be unduly complex.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 10 said that the drafting group proposed that paragraph(1) be split into two subparagraphs.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that PPPs were an important topic for both developed and developing countries and met the prioritization criteria.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 62, said that the title should be amended to read" Changes during the operation of a framework agreement".
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that article 57 should, for consistency' s sake, contain a reference to article 8 similar to that in article 59(3)(e)(i).
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) insisted that a more balanced explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of tender securities should be reflected in the draft Guide.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), supported by Mr. Bellenger(France), said that the Commission should have been informed of the change in its programme of work.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that the wording of paragraph 6 might be confusing as it referred to article 28(1), whereas the addendum addressed later articles.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to the second sentence of paragraph(3), said that the issue regarding the type of information that might be disclosed remained to be discussed.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that the drafting group proposed that the title of chapter VIII be" Challenge proceedings" and that the title of article 63 be" Right to challenge".
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that paragraph 3(c) stated that" collusion would probably violate the law of the State", but should read" collusion would violate the law of the State".
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 14(1), said that the drafting group proposed that the word" in" be inserted before the words" the pre-qualification or pre-selection documents".
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), speaking on behalf of the Western European and other States, proposed that Mr. Wiwen-Nilsson(Sweden) be elected Vice-Chair of the Commission in his personal capacity.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), while expressing support for the proposal, said that the deletion of that phrase would not be sufficient to cover all cases of attempts to circumvent the spirit of the Model Law.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 31(1)(a), proposed the insertion of the words" or repeated" after" indefinite" in the phrase" is expected to arise on an indefinite basis".
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) said that he had no strong opinion about the footnote to parenthetical subparagraph(1)(k), although, if retained, it should logically become a footnote to paragraph(2).
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria) endorsed the proposal made by the delegation of the United States of America regarding an article 20 bis and the proposal made by the delegation of Canada regarding article 21(7).
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), responding to the comments made with respect to article 10(4), said that there were cases where a procuring entity might legitimately require the use of a particular production method.
Mr. Fruhmann(Austria), referring to article 16, proposed that subparagraph(1)(c)(ii) be deleted as subparagraph(1)(b) already covered the question of the issuing of a tender security in cases of domestic procurement.