What is the translation of " AUSTRALOPITHECUS " in English?

• australopithecus

Examples of using Australopithecus in Croatian and their translations into English

Imati ćeš priliku vidjeti lubanju australopithecusa.
You're gonna have the opportunity of seeing an australopithecus skull.

Fosili Australopithecusa afarensisa otkriveni su samo u Istočnoj Africi.
Australopithecus afarensis fossils have only been discovered within Eastern Africa.

Smatra se da je Paranthropus radije nastanjivao pošumljena područja nego travnjake, koje je preferirao Australopithecus.
Paranthropus is thought to have lived in wooded areas rather than the grasslands of Australopithecus.

Ne, Australopithecus. Prvo je bio posvuda: U Izraelu, u Francuskoj, posvuda.
No, the Australopithecus. He was first everywhere: In Israel, in France, everywhere.

Prvi je vjerojatno i sam predak nije majmun, vrste roda Australopithecus, pojavio se u istočnoj Africi oko 5 milijuna.
The first probable ancestor who was not a monkey, a species of the genus Australopithecus, appeared in East Africa about 5 million.

Ne, Australopithecus. Prvo je bio posvuda: U Izraelu, u Francuskoj, posvuda.
As if he was first everywhere: in Israel, in France, everywhere.-No, the Australopithecus.

Mi smo ići u školu gotovo cijelom svijetu, mislim, koliko Australopithecus znate li tko je učio svoje potomstvo kako izračunati 589-78?
We go to school almost all over the world, I mean, how many Australopithecus know that taught their offspring how to figured 589-78?

Robusni tip Australopithecusa preimenovan je u rod Paranthropus P. robustus iz Južne Afrike, te P. boisei i P. aethiopicus iz Istočne Afrike.
The robust variety of Australopithecus has since been renamed Paranthropus P. robustus from South Africa, and P. boisei and P. aethiopicus from East Africa.

Veći čeoni režanj bi implicirao Homo erectus, ali onda bi imali očnjake… mogli bi biti Australopithecus, ali čeoni režanj bi bio manje izražen.
Uh, the larger brow ridge would imply Homo but the brow ridge would be less prominent… uh, they could be Australopithecus, erectus, but then again, they would have canine teeth… You don't know.

Malo sam istraživao Australopithecus na Internetu i… ajme, što se tebi dogodilo?
Going on the Internet to do a little research on Australopithecus, and wow, what happened to you?

Veći čeoni režanj bi implicirao Homo erectus, ali onda bi imali očnjake… mogli bi biti Australopithecus, ali čeoni režanj bi bio manje izražen.
Uh, the larger brow ridge would imply Homo erectus, but then again, they would have canine teeth… uh, they could be Australopithecus, but the brow ridge would be less prominent… You don't know.

Malo sam istraživao Australopithecus na Internetu i ajme, što se tebi dogodilo?
There you are. Going on the Internet to do a little research on Australopithecus, and wow, what happened to you?

Današnji monogamni primati kao što su giboni imaju tendenciju za ispoljavanje teritorijalnosti, a fosilni dokazi ukazuju na to da su Australopithecus afarensis živjeli u velikim grupama.
Modern monogamous primates such as gibbons tend to be also territorial, but fossil evidence indicates that Australopithecus afarensis lived in large groups.

Ovaj se podatak dovodi u pitanje, jer pronalazak fosila Australopithecusovog stopala podiže sumnju da tragove iz Laetolija nije ostavio Australopithecus.
This can be questioned, as finds of Australopithecus foot bones indicate the Laetoli footprints may not have been made by Australopithecus.

Dakle, ona pripada našem obiteljskom stablu, ali unutar toga, naravno, napravite detaljnu analizu i sada znamo da pripada Lucy vrsti poznatoj kao Australopithecus afarensis.
So she belongs to our family tree, but within that, of course, you do detailed analysis, and we know now that she belongs to the Lucy species, known as Australopithecus afarensis.

Postojale su također znatne morfološke razlike između Australopithecusa i Paranthropusa, iako su one pronađene gotovo isključivo u morfologiji lubanje, dok su im postkranijalni ostaci bili vrlo slični.
There were significant morphological differences between Australopithecus and Paranthropus, although the differences were found on the cranial remains.

Veći čeoni režanj bi implicirao Homo erectus, ali onda bi imali očnjake… mogli bi biti Australopithecus, ali čeoni režanj bi bio manje izražen.
Uh, the larger brow ridge would imply Homo… uh, they could be Australopithecus, but the brow ridge would be less prominent… erectus, but then again, they would have canine teeth… You don't know.

Još jedna stvar koja komplicira slika je da su njihovi mozgovi su bili relativno mali i prilično slične i Homo habilis, ili možda čak primita förmänniskan Australopithecus.
Another thing that complicates the picture is that their brains were relatively small and rather reminds and Homo habilis, or maybe even the primitiga förmänniskan Australopithecus.

Curnoe umjesto toga predlaže da je Australopithecus garhi, pronađen u Etiopiji i starosti oko 2, 5 miliona godina, bolje objašnjenje za najranijeg izravnog pretka u evolutivnoj liniji ljudi.
Curnoe instead proposes that Australopithecus garhi, found in Ethiopia and dating to about 2.5 million years ago, is a better explanation for the earliest non-Homo direct ancestor in the human evolutionary line.

Ako se jasno dokaže da je Orrorin izravni ljudski predak, tada bi se pripadnici roda Australopithecine kao Australopithecus afarensis("Lucy") smatrali bočnom granom obiteljskog stabla hominida.
If Orrorin proves to be a direct human ancestor, then australopithecines such as Australopithecus afarensis("Lucy") may be considered a side branch of the hominid family tree: Orrorin is both earlier, by almost 3 million years.

Australopithecusa robustusa i Australopithecusa boisei posebno su zastupljeni u Južnoafričkoj Repubilici na lokalitetima Kromdraai i Swartkrans, te oko jezera Turkana u Keniji.
Fossils of robust australopithecines such as Au. robustus(or alternatively Paranthropus robustus) and Au./P. boisei are particularly abundant in South Africa at sites such as Kromdraai and Swartkrans, and around Lake Turkana in Kenya.

U tom je vremenskom razdoblju postojalo više vrsta australopiteka, od kojih su nama poznati Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus sediba i Australopithecus africanus.
During this time period various forms of australopiths existed, including Australopithecus anamensis, Au. afarensis, Au. sediba, and Au. africanus.

Međutim, iako se nazivi Australopithecus robustus i Paranthropus robustus koriste za iste primjerke, neki istraživači, počevši s Robertom Broomom, a kasnije i osobama kao što su Bernard A. Wood, smatraju da postoji razlika između rodova Australopithecus i Paranthropus, te da bi oni trebali biti odvojeni.
However, although Australopithecus robustus and Paranthropus robustus are used interchangeably for the same specimens, some researchers, beginning with Robert Broom, and continuing with people such as Bernard A. Wood, think that there is a difference between Australopithecus and Paranthropus, and that there should be two genera.

Istraživanje omjera izotopa stroncija u zubima(2011.) ukazalo je na to da su grupe vrsta Australopithecus africanus i P. robustus u Južnoj Africi bile patrilokalne: ženke su se, za razliku od mužjaka, nastanjivale dalje od mjesta rođenja.
A 2011 study using ratios of strontium isotopes in teeth suggested that Australopithecus africanus and P. robustus groups in southern Africa were patrilocal: females tended to settle farther from their region of birth than males did.

Prema Curnoeu, A. sediba se čini"mnogo primitivnijim od H. gautengensisa, a živio je u isto vrijeme i na istom mjestu kao i on," pa stoga"Homo gautengensis čini vrstu Australopithecus sediba još manje vjerojatnim pretkom modernih ljudi.
Sediba seems"much more primitive than H. gautengensis, and lived at the same time and in the same place," according to Curnoe, and as a result,"Homo gautengensis makes Australopithecus sediba look even less likely to be the ancestor of humans.

Meave Leakey i njeni kolege su 1995. godine, zamijetivši razlike između Australopithecus afarensisa i novih otkrića, iste priključili novoj vrsti, A. anamensis, čiji su naziv izveli iz turkanske riječi anam, što znači"jezero.
In 1995, Meave Leakey and her associates, taking note of differences between Australopithecus afarensis and the new finds, assigned them to a new species, A. anamensis, deriving its name from the Turkana word anam, meaning"lake.

U osamdesetim godinama prošlog stoljeća Etiopija je postala najvažnije paleoantropološko nalazište nakon što je Don Johanson pronašao"Lucy", najbolje očuvanog fosila vrste Australopithecus afarensis u blizini mjesta Hadar u sjevernoj Etiopiji.
In the late 1970s and the 1980s, Ethiopia emerged as the new hot spot of paleoanthropology after"Lucy", the most complete fossil member of the species Australopithecus afarensis, was found in 1974 by Donald Johanson near Hadar in the desertic Afar Triangle region of northern Ethiopia.

Nazivi koji se prpisuju mnogim od tih stvorenja… su Australopithecus(ili Paranthropus) robustus, Australopithecus(ili Paranthropus ili Zinjanthropus) boisei, te Australopithecus(ili Paranthropus) aethiopicus.
Names that have been attached to various of these creatures… are Australopithecus(or Paranthropus) robustus, Australopithecus(or Paranthropus or Zinjanthropus) boisei, and Australopithecus(or Paranthropus) aethiopicus.

Afrika, posebice središnja istočna Afrika, u znanstvenoj zajednici smatrana je zemljom porijekla čovjeka i porodičnog stabla Hominidae( veliki majmuni), što je dokazano otkrićem najranijih hominida i njihovih vjerojatnih predaka, kao i kasnijih čiji ostaci datiraju prije otprilike sedam milijuna godina- ukljućujući Sahelanthropus tchadensisa, Australopithecus africanusa.
Africa, particularly central Eastern Africa, is widely accepted as the origin of humans and the Hominidae clade(great apes), as evidenced by the discovery of the earliest hominids and their ancestors, as well as later ones that have been dated to around seven million years ago, including Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Australopithecus africanus, A.

Rod australopiteka je vrlo dobro pokriven fosilnim dokazima, s vrstom Australopithecus afarensis od koje su pronađeni fosilni ostaci više od stotine jedinki kako u sjevernoj Etiopiji, tako i u Keniji i Južnoj Africi.
The australopithecine species that is best represented in the fossil record is Australopithecus afarensis with more than one hundred fossil individuals represented, found from Northern Ethiopia(such as the famous"Lucy"), to Kenya, and South Africa.