Examples of using Actuarial implications in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
(a) Actuarial implications(considered not significant by the Committee of Actuaries);
It had alsoconsidered other matters that would have actuarial implications and required the approval of the General Assembly.
The actuarial implications of each of the four items covered by the consensus agreement are summarized in annex VI below.
Since the number of reported remarriages was extremely small,there would be no significant actuarial implications in either case.
(e) Provide the actuarial implications of possible changes recommended to the Board.
On the other hand, they did not believe that the" remarriage penalty" should be lifted at this time,as that could give rise to actuarial implications.
ACABQ also stated that the actuarial implications of the total administrative cost of the Fund should continue to be monitored.
Representatives of governing bodies noted that suggestions were being advanced to make anumber of changes in benefit provisions with potential actuarial implications.
Further, the Committee believes that the actuarial implications of the total administrative cost of the Fund should continue to be monitored.
ACABQ agreed with that view, on the understanding that the policy ofadministrative cost restraint would continue and that the actuarial implications would continue to be monitored(para. 22).
In addition, because of the actuarial implications and technical complications involved, the Board requested the Committee of Actuaries to re-examine this subject in all its aspects.
The package of four measures which the Board agreed by consensus to recommend to the General Assembly for implementation with effect from 1 July 1995,together with their actuarial implications, are set out below.
Based on the minimal actuarial implications and on the very limited data available, the Committee of Actuaries agreed that any further action or adjustment with respect to the new measure would not appear warranted at that time.
The Board requested that the Secretary/CEO, with the assistance of the consulting actuary,report to the Standing Committee in 2003 on possible measures and their actuarial implications.
They stressed further that the very marginal actuarial implications of such a measure would not justify deferring action on a long overdue improvement of the adjustment provisions for beneficiaries in high inflation/soft currency areas.
He requested further information on the proposed new transfer agreements, particularly the proposed agreement with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe(OSCE),the terms of the previous agreement and the actuarial implications of altering it.
Based on the minimal actuarial implications and on the very limited data available, the Committee of Actuaries agreed that any further action or adjustment in respect to this new measure would not appear warranted at this time.
As regards the costs under(a), consideration could also be given to having the organizations share those costs that relate to certain services and facilities(e.g., computer services, office space and audits)so as to limit the actuarial implications.
The Board noted that, given the minimal actuarial implications and the very limited amount of data available, the Committee of Actuaries had agreed that any further action or adjustment in respect of the new measure did not appear to be warranted at present.
Since then, participants ' representatives in IAEA,ILO and UNIDO had also requested a study on the actuarial implications of moving to quarterly or monthly adjustment of pensions in high inflation/soft currency locations.
As regards the actuarial implications, the Committee of Actuaries indicated that, since relatively few participants would, for financial reasons,defer receipt of a benefit for a period beyond 12 months, the actuarial implications of the proposed change would not be significant.
In this general context, the Secretary-General and the International Civil Service Commission may wish to explore the possibility of changing the mandatory age of separation, taking into account such issues as the rejuvenation of the Secretariat,vacancy rates and the actuarial implications of that course of action for the Pension Fund.
The Board noted that the Committee of Actuaries had agreed,on the basis of the minimal actuarial implications and the very limited amount of data available, that any further action or adjustment in respect of the new measure would not appear to be warranted at present.
Monitoring of costs of modifications of the two-track feature of the Pension Adjustment System is discussed in paragraphs 49 to 59 of the report.1 The Committee notes that the Board agreed that no changes would be needed at this time butthe relevant actuarial implications would continue to be monitored in conjunction with the actuarial valuations.
In 2005,the Standing Committee also considered two documents concerning the actuarial implications and estimated resource requirements if the Regulations were changed to allow for the purchase of additional years of contributory service, under certain limited circumstances.
The Commission recalled that, by its resolution 63/250, the General Assembly had endorsed the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions that the Secretary-General and ICSC explore the possibility of changing the mandatory age of separation, taking into account such issues as the rejuvenation of the secretariat,vacancy rates and the actuarial implications of that course of action for the Pension Fund.
They requested that information be provided on the actuarial implications of each possible change, including reduction in the rate of contribution, with a view to preparing for the next Board session a comprehensive, prioritized list of possible improvements that would be analysed in the light of the actuarial situation of the Fund as at the end of 1999.
Other members noted that, as indicated in the report of the Working Group, the General Assembly had endorsed the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions that the Secretary-General and ICSC should explore the possibility of changing the mandatory age of separation, taking into account such issues as the rejuvenation of the Secretariat,vacancy rates and the actuarial implications of that course of action for the Pension Fund.
As regards the actuarial implications of a change, the Committee of Actuaries concluded that, bearing in mind the limited number of beneficiaries potentially affected, this was not an issue to be resolved solely on the basis of actuarial considerations, but rather required a judgement by the Board as to desirability of a change in the frequency of adjustments at this time, taking into account the impact of such a change on pensions in payment and on the administration of an already complex adjustment system.
In this connection, the Advisory Committee recalls that, in an earlier report on human resources management, it invited the Secretary-General and the International Civil Service Commission to explore the possibility of changing the mandatory age of separation, taking into account such issues as the rejuvenation of the Secretariat,vacancy rates and the actuarial implications of that course of action for the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund(see A/63/526, para. 78).