Examples of using Level of reliability in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Substantially equivalent level of reliability".
Level of reliability varying with the jurisdiction.
Providing test results with the highest level of reliability.
Level of reliability varying within a jurisdiction.
The stations have a very high level of reliability of services.
What level of reliability for these mechanisms is considered acceptable?
We may send and receive text messages through cellular telephone operators orother networks, and the level of reliability may vary.
This level of reliability for web hosting comes from planning, not luck.
If there is to be a minimal reliability limit forcertain specific types of explosive ordnance, what level of reliability should be considered acceptable?
A high level of reliability in testing complex samples has to be accomplished.
By incorporating three IP interfaces that can be used for streaming and management,the IP Link MPXp system can provide a level of reliability not seen in comparably priced codecs.
It was explained that the level of reliability depended on the information system and that it was for the parties to choose the level of reliability adequate for their transactions.
The Working Group noted, in that connection, that the requirement of equivalence, as used in paragraph(2),did not mean that the level of reliability of the foreign certificate should be exactly identical with that of domestic ones.
It was noted that the level of reliability would vary depending on the system or types of records and that it was for the parties to choose the level of reliability adequate for their transactions.
In the preparation of the Model Law, paragraph(4) was initially formulated as a catalogue of factors to be taken into account when determining whether a certificate oran electronic signature offers a substantially equivalent level of reliability for the purposes of paragraph(2) or(3).
The requirement of equivalence, as used in paragraph(2),does not mean that the level of reliability of a foreign certificate should be exactly identical with that of a domestic certificate(ibid., para. 32).
Also, differences in national standards and procedures for the assignment of domain names make them unfit for establishing a presumption, while the insufficient transparency of the procedures for assigning domainnames in some jurisdictions make it difficult to ascertain the level of reliability of each national procedure(A/CN.9/571, para. 112).
Therefore, it would be more appropriate to require that the level of reliability of the practices of suppliers of certification services should be" comparable", rather than" at least equivalent", to that of domestic ones.
While there was general support for recasting paragraph(2) to include the notion of legal effectiveness, the views differed as to whether the applicable standard should be dependent upon the reliability of the practices followed by the foreign supplier of certification services orwhether such standard should be based on the level of reliability offered by the foreign certificate itself.
The view was expressed that the requirement that the level of reliability of the practices of foreign suppliers of certification services should be" at least" equivalent to that required in the enacting State was excessively restrictive and inappropriate in an international context.
(2) Certificates issued by a foreign information certifier are recognized as legally equivalent to certificates issued by information certifiers operating under[the law of the enacting State]if the practices of the foreign information certifier provide a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required of information certifiers under… [the law of the enacting State].
The view was expressed that registry-based systems mightbe designed in a manner to provide a higher level of reliability of the uniqueness of the electronic transferable record, while token-based systems might not provide that same level of reliability based on their technical features only.
After extensive discussion, and in an effort to bridge the gap between those who advocated eliminating paragraph(4) and those who maintained the importance of the provision, it was decided that paragraph(4) should be redrafted to state that, in determining whether a foreign certificate oran electronic signature offered a substantially equivalent level of reliability for the purposes of paragraphs(2) and(3), regard should be had to recognized international standards and to any other relevant factors.
The prevailing view that emerged in the course of the deliberations was that the standard to be used in paragraph(2)should be the level of reliability offered by the foreign certificate itself, when compared with the level of reliability offered by certificates issued by domestic suppliers of certification services.
Electronic Attestation Certificates issued by a foreign Certification Service Provider are recognized as legally equivalent to Certificates issued by CSPs operating under thisAct if the practices of the foreign CSP provide a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required of CSPs operating in the UAE, and in accordance with UAE laws and international standards.
In the context of the referendum on autonomy, the Department of Electoral Cooperation and Observation of the Organization of American States(OAS)stated that the level of reliability of the Bolivian electoral roll was over 96 per cent, exceeding the international standard required for the conduct of an electoral process. In this connection, progress has been made in the registration of women in recent years.
(3) Signatures complying with the laws of another State relating to electronic signatures are recognized as legally equivalent to signatures under… [the law of the enacting State]if the laws of the other State require a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required for such signatures under… [the law of the enacting State].[Such recognition may be made by a published determination of the State or through bilateral or multilateral agreement with other States.].
(3) Signatures complying with the laws of another State relating to digital or other electronic signatures are recognized as legally equivalent to signatures under… [the law of the enacting State]if the laws of the other State require a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required for such signatures under… [the law of the enacting State].[Such recognition may be made by a published determination of the State or through bilateral or multilateral agreement with other States.].
(2) Signatures and records complying with the laws of another State relating to digital or other electronic signatures are recognized as legally equivalent to signatures andrecords complying with these Rules if the laws of the other State require a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required for such records and signatures under… [the Law of the enacting State].[Such recognition may be made by a published determination of the State or through bilateral or multilateral agreement with other States.].
(2) Certificates issued by a foreign information certifier are recognized as legally equivalent to certificates issued by information certifiers operating under… [the law of the enacting State]if the practices of the foreign information certifiers provide a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required of information certifiers under… [the law of the enacting State].[Such recognition may be made through a published determination of the State or through bilateral or multilateral agreement between or among the States concerned.].