Examples of using Lisbon protocol in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
By the end of 1993,all the States concerned had ratified START I and the Lisbon Protocol.
In 1992 we signed the Lisbon Protocol, confirming our commitment to join the Non-Proliferation Treaty as a non-nuclear State.
He cites the INF Treaty, the START I and II treaties and the Lisbon Protocol as examples of such changes.
Kazakhstan then signed the Lisbon Protocol, thus committing itself to removing all nuclear weapons from its territory for their destruction.
Kazakhstan, as is well known, was the first State to ratify the Treaty on the Reduction andLimitation of Strategic Offensive Arms and the Lisbon Protocol.
Kazakhstan was the first of the parties to the Lisbon Protocol to accede to the Non-Proliferation Treaty as a non-nuclear State.
Kazakstan confirmed its commitment to international obligations bybeing the first to ratify the START I Treaty and the Lisbon Protocol.
We then signed the five-party Lisbon Protocol, thus committing ourselves to implement the Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms.
Yesterday the Supreme Rada of the Ukraine, with 254 votes in favour and nine abstentions,ratified the START I Treaty and the Lisbon Protocol to that Treaty.
They welcomed the real possibility to bring the START I Treaty and the Lisbon Protocol into force in the very near future and pledged full cooperation to this end.
The Lisbon Protocol also contained undertakings[by Kazakhstan, Belarus and Ukraine] to accede to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as non-nuclear-weapon States.
After gaining independence, Kazakhstan signed the 1992 Lisbon Protocol stipulating its commitment to join the Non-Proliferation Treaty as a nonnuclear State.
The historic role of that Treaty would have been incomplete without the significant efforts undertaken by those States to implement it,or without their full compliance with the commitments assumed under the 1992 Lisbon Protocol.
Kazakhstan was the first party to the StrategicArms Reduction Treaty to fulfil its commitments under the Lisbon Protocol by eliminating its nuclear potential, the fourth in the world in terms of its destructive power.
We urge those countries, especially Ukraine and Kazakhstan, to accede to the NPT as non-nuclear-weapon States. More generally, we urge thosetwo States to apply, without delay, the commitments contained in the Lisbon Protocol.
All this meant that the Ukrainian Parliament was able toovercome its reservations in respect of article 5 of the Lisbon Protocol, and this opened the path to Ukraine ' s acceding to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
The cost of destroying weapons under the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe increases daily, as does the cost of dismantling andremoving nuclear weapons from Belarus according to the START I Treaty and the Lisbon Protocol.
Clear proof of this is the fact that Kazakhstan was the first toratify the Treaty on Strategic Offensive Arms and the Lisbon Protocol, and took a step unprecedented in history by closing for ever the Semipalatinsk nuclear base.
After signing the Lisbon Protocol of 23 May 1992, the Republic of Kazakhstan, along with other States successors to the USSR, was recognized as a party to the START I Treaty and undertook to accede to the non-proliferation Treaty as a non-nuclear State.
Mr. BATIOUK(Ukraine) informed the Committee that on 18 November 1993 the Ukrainian Parliament, in a historic action, had ratified the Treaty on the Reduction andLimitation of Strategic Offensive Arms(START I) and the Lisbon Protocol by an overwhelming majority.
In particular, reports on the dramatic negotiations on the 1992 Lisbon Protocol, which ultimately contributed to the denuclearization of Belarus, Ukraine and Kazakhstan after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, drew the attention of participants.
Moreover, we should recall the commitment undertaken by the United States andthe four members of the Commonwealth of Independent States that signed the Lisbon Protocol to reduce significantly their nuclear arsenals; this constitutes another step in the same direction.
Ukraine is also violating the Lisbon Protocol to the Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms(SALT I), under which it undertook as a non-nuclear-weapon State to accede at the earliest possible date to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
Last February, the Parliament of Belarus virtually unanimouslyratified the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty(START I) and the Lisbon Protocol to that Treaty, and also took the decision to accede, as a non-nuclear State, to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
Portugal urges all the parties that have not yet done so to ratify it, and reiterates the need for all the nuclear-weapon States that have emerged from the former Soviet Union to implement and comply with the obligations resulting fromthe START I and START II Treaties and the Lisbon Protocol.
Two important Strategic Arms Reduction Treaties were signed, followed by the Treaty on the Reduction of Conventional Forces inEurope, the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Open Skies Treaty, the Lisbon Protocol and many other agreements. They have all become major political and diplomatic achievements.
May 1992-- Kazakhstan signs the Lisbon Protocol to the Treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms(START I Treaty), setting out its undertaking not to possess nuclear weapons and its obligations with respect to the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
In this connection, it is heartening to note encouraging developments since last year in theeffective implementation of all the provisions of the START I Treaty and the Lisbon Protocol by signatories which are members of the Commonwealth of Independent States.
An expression of the commitment of Belarus to these obligations was its ratification of the Treaty on the Reduction andLimitation of Strategic Offensive Arms and the Lisbon Protocol to it; its accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons(NPT); and its signing of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty(CTBT).
Considerable progress has been achieved in this area with the Treaty on intermediate-range nuclear forces(INF), the two Treaties on strategic arms reductions(START),including the Lisbon Protocol, and drastic unilateral nuclear reductions by both the North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO) and Russia in Europe.