Examples of using Server operating system in English and their translations into Bulgarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Will their website be run by a Windows server operating system or will they prefer to go for a Unix system? .
Because of its modern internal design, CoreOS uses with up to 50% less RAM(system memory)than any other existing server operating system.
The plugin will collect anonymously the server operating system, PHP version, database type and version of the user.
It is required if you are upgrading from Office Project Server 2007 deployed on hardware that only supports a 32-bit server operating system.
Windows Server 2008 is the most advanced Windows Server operating system yet, designed to power the next-generation of networks, applications, and Web services.
Microsoft Exchange falls in the server software category andis designed to be used exclusively for server operating system such as Windows Server. .
Microsoft Windows Server is a server operating system with a great array of features that will make your company's IT much more efficient, secure and easily manageable.
Since EnterpriseOne® Online is available via the Internet,you will get a complete ERP system without any costs for a server, a server operating system, database software, network and cooling equipment, as well as expensive IT specialists.
Furthermore, the expression‘work group server operating system' is indeed used in the industry to designate the‘type of products at stake in the[contested] decision'.
In its complaint, Sun Microsystems criticised Microsoft's refusal to disclose to it the technology necessary to allow interoperability of its work group server operating system with the Windows Client PC operating system. .
Burapha Linux Server is an open source andfree Linux server operating system, the descendant of Burapha Linux 5.5, which in turn was a descendant of Slackware 10.x.
Microsoft observes that neither the letter of 15 September 1998 norSun's complaint of 10 December 1998 gives the slightest indication that Sun intended to use‘Microsoft's technology' to create anything other than a work group server operating system.
A competitor wishing to write a server operating system that understands Microsoft's protocols will have to write code in its product that implements the specifications.
Second, Microsoft's assertion in any event has no basis in fact,since the file shows that the expressions‘work group server' and‘work group server operating system' are used in the industry to designate the type of products covered by the contested decision.
Windows Server 2016 is a server operating system developed by Microsoft as part of the Windows NT family of operating systems, developed concurrently with Windows 10.
It is essential to distinguish that technical documentation from the source code of Microsoft's products, and a competitor wishing to write a server operating system which‘understands' Microsoft's protocols will have to ensure that its product includes source code that implements the protocol specifications.
It is a full-function server operating system that supports up to eight processors and provides enterprise-class features such as eight-node clustering using Microsoft Cluster Server(MSCS) software and support for up to 32 GB of memory.
Also, the third Mercer survey shows that‘interoperability with Windows work posts' is the factor in respect of which the gap between Microsoft's work group server operating system and its competitors' systems is the widest(see paragraph 411 above).
Linux is present on the work group server operating system market in association with Samba software, which is also distributed under a‘GNU GPL' licence(recitals 294, 506 and 598).
Still in the rejoinder, moreover, the Commission emphasises that Microsoft does not denythat interoperability with client PCs- and, more especially, with Windows client PCs- is particularly important for the performance of work group tasks by a server operating system.
On that last point, the applicant submits that the same work group server operating system can run on servers of very different prices, and in particular on servers costing more than USD 25 000.
However, those results must be qualified, because, as the Commission explains at recitals 643 and 659 to the contested decision,interoperability is a factor which influences other factors that purchasers take into consideration when choosing a work group server operating system.
Fedora Server is a short-lifecycle,community-supported server operating system that enables seasoned system administrators, experienced with any OS, to make use of the very latest technologies available in the open source community.
The Commission describes that compatibility in terms of‘interoperability with the Windows domain architecture'(recital 182 to the contested decision) andmaintains that such interoperability is‘necessary for a work group server operating system vendor in order to viably stay on the market'(recital 779 to the contested decision).
It is a full-function server operating system that supports up to 8 physical processors and provides enterprise-class features such as eight-node clustering using Microsoft Cluster Server(MSCS) software and support for up to 64 GB of RAM through PAE(added with the/PAE boot string).
It is also true that, in answer to question 2 in the same request for information, 62 organisations out of 85(approximately 72.9%)stated that they appreciated the flexibility offered by a work group server operating system which, in addition to file and print services and user and group administration services, was able to supply‘non-mission critical' services.
However, the mechanism in its NetWare server operating system allows only a maximum of 150 domain controllers to function in a perfectly synchronised manner within a‘blue bubble', whereas the mechanism used by Active Directory in the Windows 2000 Server system can deal with several thousand domain controllers simultaneously.
Thus, in the first place, the Commission was correct to observe, at recital 694 to the contested decision, that‘[owing]to the lack of interoperability that competing work group server operating system products can achieve with the Windows domain architecture, an increasing number of consumers are locked into a homogeneous Windows solution at the level of work group server operating systems'.
Recital 1003 states that‘[t]he objective of this Decision is to ensure that Microsoft's competitors can develop products that interoperate with the Windows domain architecture natively supported in the dominantWindows Client PC operating system and hence viably compete with Microsoft's work group server operating system'.
In the Commission's view these reports demonstrate that customers choose Windows as a work group server operating system because of Microsoft's‘unfair interoperability advantage', in spite of the fact that Windows is‘lagging behind' other products on a number of features that customers consider important.
