Examples of using Gmos in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Like GMOs? Oh, nothing so fancy.
The final point concerns GMOs.
To say that GMOs are a bad thing, just like that, is an ideological prejudice.
Organisations and institutions active on fighting against GMOs.
EFSA has also accepted every single application to use GMOs that has been submitted to it.
The European Union should act with caution regarding GMOs.
We cannot allow even a low level presence of GMOs in protein crops for food and feed imported into the EU.
You know, I told your mom about feeding you all those GMOs.
First of all, it is true that there is no scientific evidence that GMOs pose a hazard to human or animal health.
At the moment they are being denied that choice by prejudice against GMOs.
However, I want to point out that GMOs are not the only solution for decreasing dependency on proteins imported from third countries.
However, we do not feel that the solution lies in substituting GMOs for pesticides.
GMOs: on this subject, I am of course speaking in a personal capacity, because it is frowned on to become unilaterally involved in this issue.
Instead, the Commission continues authorising an ever-increasing number of GMOs to enter the EU agricultural market.
In this case, an avenue would have opened up in the future for marketing in the EU food products containing GMOs.
Finally, the defence of the EU regime for authorising and marketing GMOs is a point to which I attach particular importance.
Moreover, this increase affects all countries, including those with very flexible legislation on GMOs.
US diplomats are given the instructions to promote GMOs across Europe and belittle opponents of this technology as ignorant and against progress.
I believe that the Commission must take immediate action to stop crops with even a low presence of GMOs from accessing the EU market.
Do we therefore want to allow such GMOs- I call them messed around food- simply because that meets an economic need?
Important improvements have already been made in reducing the procedure orthe time line- the time necessary- for authorising GMOs.
Furthermore none of the other European countries outside of the EU grow GMOs(e.g. Norway, Switzerland, Iceland, Serbia, Montenegro, etc), according to FoEI.
We have new technologies entering the food market- as has already been mentioned in this Chamber- such as nanotechnology and GMOs.
I personally am strongly against GMOs, but I cannot imagine how we could trace efficiently which animals were fed with GMOs and which were not.
This framework is of no more help in combating climate change than the carbon market,biofuels and GMOs on which this text prides itself.
A technical solution for minor traces of GMOs in imported protein products could ensure that the European market has sufficient supplies of soya available.
That is why our greatest success is that the Council andthe Commission have agreed to Parliamentary control of the implementation of the labelling requirements of GMOs.
On the contrary, we have the example of the United States where the highest tolerance towards GMOs is combined with the highest obesity incidence.
In February 2010 the Environment andWater Committee of the Bulgarian Parliament agreed to a fiveyear ban on Genetically Modified Organisms GMOs.
I consider that GMOs represent a considerable threat to health and the environment in the EU and that all decisions on such matters deserve the fullest scrutiny possible.