Examples of using Commission cannot accept amendment in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The Commission cannot accept Amendment 15.
Because this amendment duplicates existing requirements andbecause the deadline is not realistic, the Commission cannot accept Amendment 5.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment: 7.
As far as recycling, reuse and recovery of end-of-life vehicles is concerned, the Commission cannot accept Amendment No 34, because it would remove the short-term recovery target.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment No 3.
For similar reasons, the Commission cannot accept Amendment 10.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment No 11 for both technical and political reasons.
I would, nevertheless, like to point out that the Commission cannot accept Amendment 14 concerning social protection for assisting spouses.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment No 13, which introduces the principle of best possible advice.
Since the Natura 2000 network falls under the Community's environmental policy, the Commission cannot accept Amendment 9 in a regulation which exclusively concerns the common fisheries policy.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment 15 since Article 7 refers only to the obligations of Member States.
Therefore the Commission cannot accept Amendment No 1.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment No 1, because we consider that the expenditure relating to the agreement is compulsory.
In addition, the Commission cannot accept Amendment No 8.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment 19 because it considers it better to keep the themes general rather than specific.
In addition, the Commission cannot accept Amendment No 28.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment 33 as it is felt that three years is too short a period within which to have an external evaluation.
Finally, the Commission cannot accept Amendment No 14.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment 37- as I have stated previously, RACs have an advisory role and should not be involved in management.
In response to the amendments proposed by Mr Miller, the Commission cannot accept Amendment No 9, which asks for the expenditure for the early retirement scheme to remain non-compulsory.
Finally, the Commission cannot accept Amendment 23 deleting the recital referring to the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
As far as the phasing-out of methyl bromide is concerned, the Commission cannot accept Amendment No 5 because the ban on critical use exemptions in agriculture after the year 2006 would be contrary to the Montreal Protocol.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment No 30 which seeks to expand the possibilities to grant exemptions for substances that have already been phased out.
So the Commission cannot accept Amendment No 25.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment No 7 because it goes far beyond the scope of the proposal which is movement between Member States and from third countries.
Similarly, the Commission cannot accept Amendment No 3 which would remove any exemptions beyond 2006.
The Commission cannot accept amendment 92 setting minimum fines and penalties, as this would be direct interference in Member States' legal systems.
Similarly, the Commission cannot accept Amendment 103, which deletes the provisions on corrective measures.
The Commission cannot accept Amendment 2 on the definition of infringements, as the definition of serious infringements is clear and is set out in Regulation No 1447/99.
Finally, the Commission cannot accept Amendment 20 because it would impinge on the Commission's role in executing the programme.