Examples of using Fragment in tallinn in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Photos of the fragment in Tallinn.
Is the fragment in Tallinn a surviving fragment of Lübeck's original painting from 1463?
Er fragmentet i Tallinn en overlevende rest af Lübecks originale maleri fra 1463?Restoring the fragment in Tallinn.
Restaureringen af fragmentet i Tallinn.Von Melle was able to read 4 lines at the beginning of the painting and they resemble the fragment in Tallinn.
Von Melle kunne læse 4 linjer Is the fragment in Tallinn a remnant from Lübeck?
Er fragmentet i Tallinn en rest fra Lübeck?This is the end of the fragment in Tallinn.
Her slutter teksten fra fragmentet i Tallinn.The text is still from the fragment in Tallinn, except for Death's first 4 lines, which also survive from Lübeck.
Teksten er stadig fra fragmentet i Tallinn, bortset fra Dødens første 4 linjer, der også er bevaret fra Lübeck.We are able to compare the picture with the fragment in Tallinn.
Vi kan sammenligne billedet med fragmentet i Tallinn.Heise postulated that the fragment in Tallinn was lower because the top had been cut off.
Heise postulerede, at fragmentet i Tallinn var lavere, fordi toppen var skåret væk.The illustration and the text is taken from the fragment in Tallinn.
Illustrationen og teksten er taget fra fragmentet i Tallinn.It has even been claimed that the fragment in Tallinn is a remnant of Lübeck's painting from 1463.
Det har sågar været påstået, at fragmentet i Tallinn er en rest af Lübecks maleri fra 1463.We know that Wortmann made a painstaking copy because:We are able to compare the picture with the fragment in Tallinn.
Vi ved, at Wortmann lavede en nøje kopi, fordi:Vi kan sammenligne billedet med fragmentet i Tallinn.Heise was finally disproved when the fragment in Tallinn was restored.
Heise blev endeligt modbevist ved restaureringen af fragmentet i Tallinn.Heise concluded that the fragment in Tallinn was a remnant of Lübeck's painting from 1463- and that Notke had created(not just contributed to) them both.
Heise konkluderede, at fragmentet i Tallinn var en rest af Lübeck maleri fra 1463, og at Notke havde skabt(ikke bare bidraget til) begge to.Conclusion: Gotthard von Hansen never said that the fragment in Tallinn used to end with the mayor.
Konklusion: Gotthard von Hansen har aldrig sagt, fragmentet i Tallinn tidligere sluttede med borgmesteren.Heise cannot use Gotthard von Hansen to"prove" that there used to be exactly 11 humans on the fragment in Tallinn.
Heise kan ikke bruge Gotthard von Hansen som"bevis" for, at fragmentet i Tallinn tidligere bestod af præcis 11 mennesker.Further information Restoring the fragment in Tallinn Photos of the painting in Lübeck.
Yderligere information Restaureringen af fragmentet i Tallinn Fotos Heise's theory was based on misquotes, loose claims and lack of logic.It was totally disproved when the fragment in Tallinn was restored in 1962-64.
Heises teori byggede på citatfusk, løse påstande og manglende logik, ogden blev endeligt modbevist, da fragmentet i Tallinn blev restaureret Conclusion: The painting in Lübeck and the fragment in Tallinn have different heights because they are two different paintings.
Konklusion: Maleriet Heise has just used Jacob von Melle to"prove" that the first part of the painting- until the canon- had disappeared from Lübeck, andnow he has"proved" that the fragment in Tallinn used to end with the mayor.
Heise har lige brugt Jacob von Melle til at"bevise", at første del af maleriet- indtil kannikken- var forsvundet fra Lübeck, ognu har han"bevist", at fragmentet i Tallinn sluttede med borgmesteren.During the restoration it turned up that the fragment in Tallinn hadn't been in so bad a condition that it would justify a paint-over- let alone being cut out.
Under restaureringen viste det sig, at fragmentet i Tallinn aldrig havde været så ødelagt, at det retfærdiggjorde en overmaling- endsige at blive skåret ud.Jacob von Melle is our only source for the original Low German text andfortunately it would seem that he did a good job. von Melle was able to read 4 lines at the beginning of the painting and they resemble the fragment in Tallinn.
Jacob von Melle er vores eneste kilde The lack of hard data has spawned a crackpot theory that the fragment in Tallinn is a remnant from Lübeck.
Manglen på hårde data har næret en tåbelig teori om, at fragmentet i Tallinn skulle være en rest fra Lübeck.Further information: Restoring the fragment in Tallinn St. George and the Dragon in Stockholm's cathedral(attributed to Notke) Is St. George and the dragon an allegory over the battle of Brunkeberg?
Yderligere information: Bernt Notke Restaureringen af fragmentet i Tallinn Skt. Jørgen og Dragen The answer isconnected with another question, namely: is the fragment in Tallinn a remnant of the painting in Lübeck.
Beviserne er uhyggeligt spinkle, ogsvaret hænger sammen med spørgsmålet, om fragmentet i Tallinn er en rest fra Lübeck.The painting in Lübeck was replaced by a new one in 1701 and Jacob von Melle wrote down the old text. Jacob von Melle was unableto read great parts, but luckily the fragment in Tallinn gives us some of the missing text.
The restoration also supplied the final proof against the silly claim that the fragment in Tallinn should be a remnant of Lübeck's original painting from 1463- that had been cut out in 1588.
Restaureringen modbeviste også endeligt den tåbelige påstand om, at maleriet i Tallinn var en rest af det oprindelige maleri fra 1463 It was these idle speculations about partial replacements combined with med Mantels' words about the painting being cut out that were later used by Heise for his crackpot hypothesis: That the fragment in Tallinn was a surviving remnant of Lübeck's original painting from 1463.
Det var disse løse spekulationer om udskiftning af dele af maleriet sammen med Mantels' ord om, at maleriet var skåret ud, som Carl Georg Heise senere benyttede til sin tåbelige hypotese om, at fragmentet i Tallinn var en overlevende rest af Lübecks originale maleri fra 1463.Heise ignores counter arguments Heise was finally disproved when the fragment in Tallinn was restored Why is it so important to disprove Heise?
Heise overser modargumenter Heise blev endeligt modbevist ved restaureringen af fragmentet i Tallinn Hvorfor er det vigtigt at modbevise Heise?The two texts complement each other like two pieces from a jigsaw puzzle andsome researchers believe that this is not a coincidence- but that the fragment in Tallinn is actually a remnant of the original painting from St. Mary's Church in Lübeck.
De to tekster passer sammen som to brikker 
