What is the translation of " IS NOT IN THE COMMUNITY " in Danish?

• ikke er i fællesskabets

Examples of using Is not in the community in English and their translations into Danish

This is not in the Community's interests.
Dette er ikke i Fællesskabets interesse.

Measures may not be applied where it can be clearly concluded that this is not in the Community interest.
Der anvendes ikke foranstaltninger, hvis det klart kan konkluderes, at dette ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse.

A Member State may provide that a company the head office of which is not in the Community may participate in the formation of an SE provided that company is formed under the law of a Member State, has its registered office in that Member State and has a real and continuous link with a Member State's economy.
En medlemsstat kan fastsætte, at et selskab, som ikke har sit hovedkontor i Fællesskabet, kan deltage i stiftelsen af et SE-selskab, hvis det er stiftet i overensstemmelse med en medlemsstats lovgivning, har sit vedtægtsmæssige hjemsted i samme medlemsstat og har en faktisk og vedvarende tilknytning til erhvervslivet i en medlemsstat.

It was examined whether, compelling reasons existed that could lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to adopt measures in this particular case.
Det blev undersøgt, om der var tvingende årsager til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at indføre foranstaltninger i dette tilfælde.

A Member State may provide that a legal body the head office of which is not in the Community may participate in the formation of an SCE provided that legal body is formed under the law of a Member State, has its registered office in that Member State and has a real and continuous link with a Member State's economy.
En medlemsstat kan fastsætte, at en juridisk person, som ikke har sit hovedkontor i Fællesskabet, kan deltage i stiftelsen af et SCE-selskab, såfremt dette er stiftet i overensstemmelse med en medlemsstats lovgivning, har sit vedtægtsmæssige hjemsted i samme medlemsstat og har en faktisk og vedvarende tilknytning til erhvervslivet i en medlemsstat.

Measures may not be applied where the authorities, on the basis of all the information submitted, can clearly conclude that it is not in the Community interest to apply such measures.
Der må ikke træffes foranstaltninger, hvis myndighederne tydeligt af samtlige afgivne oplysninger kan drage den konklusion, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at træffe sådanne foranstaltninger.

A company the head office of which is not in the Community should be allowed to participate in the formation of an SE provided that company is formed under the law of a Member State, has its registered office in that Member State and has a real and continuous link with a Member State's economy according to the principles established in the 1962 General Programme for the abolition of restrictions on freedom of establishment.
Et selskab, som ikke har sit hovedkontor i Fællesskabet, bør kunne deltage i stiftelsen af et SE-selskab, hvis dette er stiftet i overensstemmelse med en medlemsstats lovgivning, har sit vedtægtsmæssige hjemsted i samme medlemsstat og har en faktisk og vedvarende tilknytning til en medlemsstats erhvervsliv i overensstemmelse med principperne i det generelle program for afskaffelse af restriktioner for fri etablering fra 1962.

In addition to dumping, injury and the cause of this injury, the Commission examined whether any compelling reasons existed which could lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to impose measures.
I tillæg til spørgsmålene om dumping, skade og årsagen til skade undersøgte Kommissionen også, om der fandtes andre tvingende grunde til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at indføre foranstaltninger.

In the framework of this review, it was examined whether there were compelling reasons to conclude that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case, despite the conclusions on dumping, injury and likely recurrence of injurious dumping.
I forbindelse med denne fornyede undersøgelse blev det undersøgt, om der forelå tvingende grunde til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltningerne i det foreliggende tilfælde på trods af konklusionerne om dumping, skade og sandsynlighed for fornyet skadelig dumping.

In addition to unforeseen developments, increased imports, and serious injury, the Commission has examined whether any compelling economic reasons exist which could lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to impose measures.
Ud over uforudsete hændelser, øget import og væsentlig skade har Kommissionen undersøgt, om der er tvingende økonomiske årsager til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at indføre foranstaltninger.

It was examined whether, despite the conclusion on the existence of injurious subsidisation, compelling reasons existed that could lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to adopt measures in this particular case.
Det blev undersøgt, om der til trods for konklusionen om, at der forekom skadevoldende subsidiering, var tvingende årsager til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at indføre foranstaltninger i dette tilfælde.

On this basis it was examined whether, despite the conclusions on dumping, injury and causation, compelling reasons exist which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to impose measures in this particular case.
På dette grundlag blev det undersøgt, om der til trods for konklusionerne om dumping, skade og årsagssammenhæng var tvingende årsager til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at indføre foranstaltninger i dette tilfælde.

On this basis it was examined, whether, despite the conclusions on continuation and recurrence of injurious dumping compelling reasons exist which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
På dette grundlag undersøgtes det, om der til trods for konklusionerne om fortsat og fornyet skadelig dumping fandtes tvingende grunde til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltningerne i dette bestemte tilfælde.

On this basis it was examined, whether, despite the conclusions on a likelihood of a continuation and recurrence of injurious dumping, it could be clearly be concluded that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
På dette grundlag undersøgtes det, om det til trods for konklusionerne om sandsynligheden af, at der fortsat eller igen vil finde dumping sted, klart kunne konkluderes, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltningerne i dette bestemte tilfælde.

Measures, as determined on the basis of the dumping and injury found, may not be applied where the authorities, on the basis of all the information submitted, can clearly conclude that it is not in the Community interest to apply such measures.
De foranstaltninger, der fastsættes på grundlag af den konstaterede dumping og deraf følgende skade, må ikke anvendes, når myndighederne på grundlag af alle fremlagte oplysninger klart kan fastslå, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at anvende sådanne foranstaltninger.

On this basis it was examined whether, despite the conclusions on the likelihood of a recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
På dette grundlag blev det undersøgt, om der trods konklusionerne om sandsynligheden for fornyet dumping og skade, var tvingende grunde til, at det måtte konkluderes, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltninger i dette særlige tilfælde.

On this basis it was examined whether, despite the findings on dumping, injury and continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
På dette grundlag blev det undersøgt, om der på trods af konklusionerne om dumping, skade og fortsat eller fornyet skadelig dumping foreligger tvingende grunde til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltningerne i det foreliggende tilfælde.

In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether, despite the conclusion on injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed that could lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to adopt measures in this particular case.
Det blev i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 21 undersøgt, om der til trods for konklusionerne om skadevoldende dumping var tvingende årsager til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at indføre foranstaltninger i dette tilfælde.

On this basis, it was examined, whether, despite the findings on dumping, injury and continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping respectively, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
På dette grundlag undersøgtes det, om der trods undersøgelsesresultaterne vedrørende dumping, skade og henholdsvis fortsat eller fornyet skadelig dumping var nogen tvingende grund til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltninger i det foreliggende tilfælde.

All of them were taken into account to examine whether, despite the findings of the likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping, there were compelling reasons which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain the existing measures.
Alle bemærkninger blev taget i betragtning med henblik på at fastslå, om der- trods konklusionen om, at det var sandsynligt, at der igen ville forekomme skadevoldende dumping- var tvingende årsager til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde de gældende foranstaltninger.

On this basis it was examined, whether, despite the conclusions on dumping, on the situation of the Community industry and on the likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
På dette grundlag blev det undersøgt, om der på trods af konklusionerne om dumping, EF-erhvervsgrenens situation og sandsynligheden for fornyet skadevoldende dumping forelå tvingende grunde til, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltninger i dette særlige tilfælde.

On this basis it was examined, whether, despite the conclusions on dumping, on the situation of the Community industry and on the recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
Det blev på dette grundlag undersøgt, om der på trods af konklusionerne om dumping, situationen for erhvervsgrenen i Fællesskabet og den fornyede skadelige dumping var nogen tvingende forhold, som kunne føre til den konklusion, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltningerne i denne særlige sag.

On this basis it was examined, whether, despite the conclusions on dumping, on the situation of the Community industry and the likely continuation and/or recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons exist which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
På dette grundlag blev det undersøgt, om der på trods af konklusionerne om dumping, EF-erhvervsgrenens situation og sandsynligheden for fortsat og/eller fornyet dumping med deraf følgende skade foreligger tvingende årsager til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at indføre foranstaltninger i dette tilfælde.

On this basis it was examined whether, despite the conclusion on the benefit of the measures for the Community industry and on the likelihood of a recurrence of injurious dumping should measures expire, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
På dette grundlag blev det undersøgt, om der på trods af konklusionerne om fordelene af foranstaltningerne for EF-erhvervsgrenen og sandsynligheden for fornyet skadevoldende dumping, hvis foranstaltningerne udløber, forelå tvingende grunde til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltninger i dette særlige tilfælde.

It was examined whether, despite the conclusion on injurious subsidisation, compelling reasons existed that could lead to the conclusion that it was not in the Community interest to adopt measures in this particular case.
Det blev undersøgt, om der til trods for konklusionerne om skadevoldende subsidiering var tvingende årsager til at konkludere, at det ikke var i Fællesskabets interesse at indføre foranstaltninger i dette tilfælde.

It was therefore examined whether, despite the conclusions on the likelihood of continuation of injurious dumping, there were compelling reasons to conclude that it was not in the Community interest to maintain measures.
Det blev derfor undersøgt, om der trods konklusionerne om sandsynlighed for fortsat skadelig dumping var tvingende grunde til at konkludere, at det ikke var i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde foranstaltninger.

Such measures are not in the Community interest.
Sådanne foranstaltninger tjener ikke EU's interesse.

Food is not more expensive in the Community.
Fødevarerne er ikke dyrere i Fællesskabet.

Where the manufacturer is not established in the Community, the obligation to make the aforementioned documentation available on request applies to his authorised representative.
Er fabrikanten ikke etableret i Fællesskabet, påhviler pligten til efter anmodning at kunne forelægge ovennævnte dokumentation hans repræsentant.

In terms of economic size, the defence industry is not among the largest in the Community.
Målt efter økonomisk størrelse er rustningsindustrien ikke blandt de største i EF.

How to use "is not in the community" in an English sentence

Kapil Mondal says that he is not in the community development business to try and change society; instead, he is trying to change himself by working in the society.

How to use "ikke er i fællesskabets" in a Danish sentence

I overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 14, stk. 1, kan en procedure afsluttes, hvis klagen trækkes tilbage, medmindre en sådan afslutning ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse.

Hvis det ikke er tilfældet, kan medarbejderne vurdere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse, at oplysningerne videregives.

Generelle overvejelser Det er blevet undersøgt, om der er tvingende årsager til at konkludere, at det ikke er i Fællesskabets interesse at opretholde de gældende foranstaltninger.