Examples of using Kagg in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Sentence 2 KAGG in conjunction with§ 8b sec.
The person responsible for the content of this ad andfor the rental of this accommodation is Mikael Thulin/ Sofia Kagg Thulin.
KAGG would have had to be declared constitutional.
Although the wording of§ 40a sec. 1 KAGG(f.v.) expressly only refers to§ 8b sec.
KAGG did not originally refer to that provision.
In constitutional terms,§40a sec. 1 sentence 2 KAGG must be treated as a constitutive amendment of the law.
KAGG on the 2001 and 2002 assessment periods.
Sentence 2 KAGG to the 2001 and 2002 tax assessment periods.
KAGG is unconstitutional because the new version of§ 40a sec.
Sentence 2 KAGG, which contains an express reference to§ 8b sec.
KAGG is not merely a clarification but has an impermissible“true” retroactive effect.
Sentence 2 KAGG is unconstitutional insofar as, pursuant to§ 43 sec.
KAGG,“true” retroactive effect with regard to the 2001 and 2002 assessment periods.
Sentence 2 KAGG is“to be applied to all tax assessment periods for which assessments are not final”.
KAGG is unconstitutional and void insofar as it orders the retroactive application of§ 40a sec.
Sentence 2 KAGG into force with“true” retroactive effect for the 2001 and 2002 assessment periods.
KAGG that this provision would be subject to the same interpretation in legal practice as in the legislature's subsequent clarification.
Sentence 2 KAGG to all tax assessments covered by this provision that were not yet final.….
KAGG, which has not been clarified by jurisprudence of the highest courts, and the resulting inconsistent case-law of the fiscal courts do not yet qualify as a confused state of the law.
Sentence 2 KAGG, to be extended to shares in securities investment funds and respective reductions in profits.
Sentence 1 KAGG, the legislature expressed its intention of resolving the resulted problem of interpretation cf. BTDrucks 15/1518, p. 17.
Sentence 2 KAGG, namely that the provision was only of a clarifying nature(cf. BTDrucks 15/1518, p. 17), is not binding on the courts.
Sentence 2 KAGG in the 2001 and 2002 corporate tax assessment periods, this provision violates the constitutional principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and is void§ 78 sentence 1 in conjunction with§ 82 sec. 1 BVerfGG.
Sentence 2 KAGG to all tax assessments that were not yet final had been ordered with the consequence that partial write-downs to shares in equity funds could not decrease taxable profits in the 2002 tax assessment period.
Sentence 2 KAGG only clarified retroactively what already was the applicable law, the question whether the provision was exceptionally compatible with the general prohibition of“true” retroactivity, in spite of its formal“true” retroactivity would not arise.