Examples of using Prodcom in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Iñigo Isusi: Prodcom from the user's point of view.
On the table is a book with the prosaic title Prodcom list 1998.
Karen Larsen: Prodcom from the user's point of view.
I am not sure that the statistical framework of Prodcom is based on a sample.
The transition to a Prodcom nomenclature raises less opposition, even though the tendency remains the same.
Several countries outside the European Union have already fully implemented Prodcom.
But, there are areas in Prodcom where the quality is not satisfactory.
The security industry is notcovered as such by the main statistical nomenclatures NACE, Prodcom, etc.
I agree with Mr Lachize that Prodcom must be updated and published more frequently.
They think of these services as products, and we must then tell them that they are not included in Prodcom.
Europroms Demo 1998: European production and market statistics: Prodcom/Combined Nomenclature CD-ROM.
Since Christmas, Prodcom is updated monthly in New Cronos and published monthly on the CD-ROM Europroms.
Further progress is needed for the implementation of other classifications,such as COFOG, Prodcom, ISCED97 and ISCO88.
As Mrs Schmidt Brown said, in the beginning of Prodcom we just wanted the figures, now time has come think about quality.
Prodcom is furthermore the first European Community statistical system for which Eurostat is systematically handling the confidential data.
I also agree with Mr Mahajan that the usersmight need better information on the capabilities of Prodcom as well as its limitations.
I do not know how that is in Prodcom, but we have to demonstrate to your colleagues in the other DGs, that we are presenting the GNI of the UK as best we can.
Some 5 000 products from all sectors are covered in a survey andclassified according to a special system common to all EU countries: the Prodcom.
However, to my knowledge most Member States, conduct Prodcom as an exhaustive survey of enterprises of 20 employees, or 10 employees in some countries.
I support the idea of a general database accessible for everybody comparing the combined nomenclatures,the harmonised system and Prodcom by sectors.
Taking into account the augmenting number of countries using Prodcom for their statistics on industrial production, the significance of Prodcom will only increase.
Furthermore, the discussion should not reflect country practices orspecific enlargements in the actual implementation of Prodcom in the member countries.
Consequently Prodcom not only allows comparisons of industrial production between countries; it also makes it possible to compile data on the markets of individual products.
From the above it will be clear that thesystem for harmonised European production statistics, Prodcom, has enormously improved the insight in industrial production and markets.
Statistics on production and sales of steel products, which constituted a large part of the ECSC statistical system,will be absorbed into the existing Community system of production statistics, Prodcom.
However, it is difficult to lay down common guidelines for datavalidation because the countries do not conduct their Prodcom survey in the same way, and because they use various types of technology.
As typical examples, a hierarchical relationship exists between CN8 and HS(the first six digits of the Combined Nomenclature are identical with the Harmonized System);and crossreference links exist between the CPA and NACE or the Prodcom and CN8.
I think that we would have to investigate the possibilities to establish a working group for the implementation of Prodcom focussing on the methodological aspects, because I think that we have to clarify a lot of problems to improve on quality for the benefit of the users.
I think that we, producers in the Member States and in Eurostat, should keep in touch with our dissemination offices and data shops andcombine our forces to increase the awareness of Prodcom and the access to the data.
I know that we have started something with the questionnaire about methodology, but I think that we all agree that we still do not know what each other is doing,the users do not know what we are doing with Prodcom and what we are disserninating.