Examples of using Technoscience in English and their translations into Greek
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Computer
It is in this sense that technoscience is neither neutral nor autonomous.
Specific interest for the relations between art andnew technologies- technoscience.
Today, the non-neutrality of technoscience has become even more obvious than in the past.
Sotiropoulos Panagiotis, Researcher at CETI,regarding"The issue of public understanding of technoscience.
It is technoscience that blurs the distinction between war and terrorism.
All this has very important implications directly on technoscience and indirectly on Paideia.
Expertise at stake: technoscience and public participation in the post-truth age.
The course includes lectures,workshops and visits in technoscience sites. Undergraduate.
In this sense, technoscience is not autonomous as Castoriadis, following Jaques Ellul, argues.
It is not uncommon that the issue of the non-neutrality of technoscience is confused with the issue of its autonomy.
The relationship between earth, terra territory, andterror has changed, and it is necessary to know that this is because of knowledge, that is, because of technoscience.
It is not uncommon that the issue of the non-neutrality of technoscience is confused with the issue of its autonomy.
But the victory of capitalist technoscience over the other candidates for the universal finality of human history is another means of destroying the project of modernity while giving the impression of completing it.
It was the epoch when scientific discoveries andindustrial development- the early stage of technoscience- seemed to be the main pillars for the passage from the era of scarcity into the times of abundance.
Instead, it is argued that technoscience is conditioned by the power relations implied by the specific set of social, political and economic institutions characterising the growth economy and the dominant social paradigm.
For instance, not many people would argue today,particularly after the experience of this century, that there is some sort of correlation between Progress in technoscience and the degree of autonomy achieved in society at the political and economic levels.
And capitalism in turn empowers technoscience, which drives innovation and economic growth with scientific discoveries and their applications.
The aim of this article is to examine, from a democratic viewpoint, the claims and counter-claims on the neutral, autonomous anddemocratic character of technoscience and end up with some thoughts concerning the desired characteristics of a democratic science and technology.
Both adopted the thesis of the neutrality of technoscience, according to which technoscience is a‘means' which can be used for the attainment of capitalist or socialist development of productive forces.
Today we are seeing an explosion of new developments in this sub-circuit, including open source software, peer-to-peer networks,grid computing and other socializations of labor intrinsic to high technoscience, which we will discuss further in the next section.
Therefore, a democratic conception of technoscience has to avoid both types of determinism: technological determinism as well as social determinism.
The type of technoscience that developed in the past two centuries is not an autonomous cultural phenomenon but a by-product of the power relations and the dominant social paradigm which emerged in association with the rise of the market economy.
The high degree of concentration of power characterising today's society implies an oligarchic control over technoscience that is manifested in its content, which, in turn, expresses the existing power relations and the dominant social paradigm.
Instead, it is argued that technoscience is conditioned by the power relations implied by the specific set of social, political and economic institutions characterising the growth economy and the dominant social paradigm.
The socialist statist view, implicitly orexplicitly, adopted the thesis of the neutrality of technoscience, according to which technoscience is a‘means' which can be used for the attainment of capitalist or socialist development of productive forces.
The crisis of technoscience surfaced about 30 years ago when, on the one hand, the scientific process of creating‘objective' truths was challenged[1] and, on the other, the adverse social as well as the ecological implications of today's technology were stressed.
Today, neoliberal globalization between the two poles of so-called progress, technoscience and the liberal state, have pushed us to a catastrophe, one that will occur not in a single, colossal eschatological event but as an incremental progression.
The idea of the autonomy of technoscience leads to crude forms of determinism according to which the state of technology(of productive forces) determines at any moment of time the form of social organisation by conditioning directly production relations and indirectly the organisation of the economy and the superstructure.
An important implication of democratisation of the technoscience in the above sense is that such a process has nothing to do with the currently fashionable‘access to information' that the modern information technology supposedly secures.
In conclusion, the non-neutral andheteronomous character of technoscience today arises out of the fundamental organisational principles that characterise the growth economy and the values implied by the dominant social paradigm which is associated with it.