Examples of using Is not open source in English and their translations into Japanese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Is not open source.
This project is not open source.
Is not open source:/.
Why Android app is NOT open source?
While MemSQL offers a free version of its database, the software is not open source.
But it is not open source.
Unfortunately the software is not open source.
The documentation is not open source, but it is freely available.
Well, for one, Google Chrome itself is not open source.
So if something is not open source, it is certainly not free software.
They have never publicly said“License X is not open source.”.
Although Java is not open source, modifications can be suggested via the Java Community Process(JCP).
Unlike WordPress, it is not open source.
There is not open source, free software, and you had to implement from scratch incredibly basic, common data structures and routines;
Unlike MySQL and PostgreSQL, FrontBase is not open source.
Roberts added that, although the software is not open source, it carries all the advantages for the user of open source. .
If the project does not have a license, it is not open source.
The source code” iBoot“is proprietary andincludes Apple's copyright notice, it is not open source.”.
And they certainly don't say“Any license not on our OSI Certified™ list is not open source”, because that would be false.
Reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, decipher or otherwise attempt to derive the source code for the Services orany related technology that is not open source;
Ross continued, stating that the EOS Core chain hasn't been validated for some time andit's software is not open source, so people are not able to verify what they're working on.
It's not open source.
IIS, needless to say, isn't open source.
He's not open source, but it's very, very powerful.
These libraries are not open source and are therefore distributed as a separate NetBeans plugin.
Requires hiutil and codesign, which are not Open Source and presently only available on Mac OS X 10.6 and higher.
These products are not open source, and the Raspberry Pi licence for them is"for non-commercial use".
The one big chunk of code available then was UNIX,but even this was not open source.
Kyle Mitchell added that if licenses were to be judged in the manner that the group was judging SSPL,then GPL v2 was not open source either.