Examples of using The test code in English and their translations into Japanese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The test code itself.
What about the test code?
The test code is like this:.
How to run the test code.
Delete the test code we created inside the(document). ready function.
The test code begins by setting up the microprocessor SPI port.
Same as the Test code(1).
You want to be able to read and understand the test code easily.
I used the test code below:.
This module enables Gauche to run the test code as is.
The test code must be reproducible on EnterpriseDB's test systems.
We will write the test code in there.
Later, the test code could escape from the testbed or the example be actually coded and run on the Internet.
I won't reproduce the test code, but you.
The test code in Figure 9 resets the MAX3420E, and then writes eight bytes consisting of a walking-one pattern to the USBIEN register.
Additional parts to the Test code(1) are as follows.
When running the test code, it measures to what extent the onscreen elements correspond to these attributes and then grabs the best match.
(I wrote"using namespace std" in the test code and forgot about it.).
Since every test runs in its own environment, these scripts will beexecuted in the testing environment immediately before executing the test code itself.
You want to be able to read and understand the test code easily, even months after writing it.
This part of the test code does not require awareness of the Database Extension at all, you can go on and test whatever you like with your code. .
Trying the same approach with tuples is possible, but the test code may not be as straightforward.
The test code will have extraneous comments and code removed and to the extent possible, will be fully self-contained and automated, and will demonstrate the precise Error reported rather than other possible problems.
If you create the file for testing named test. js,you can run the test code by the following command:.
If the test code also checks the final contents of the log string after various series of operations involving the mock database then it is possible to verify that in each case exactly the expected number of database saves have been performed.
However, if you depend on id for your locators, even if the underlying behavior has not changed,you will need to refactor all of your locator definitions in the test code to remain compliant.
In the brief article Beck walks you through this process showing the test code at different steps, finally showing a"squeezed" test that spotlights the actual defect in all its glory.
Adopting text content for your locators means that even wholesale changes like the JavaScript framework being replaced would(theoretically speaking)not necessitate refactoring the test code, provided the flow of the application does not change.
Even if the naming convention for the name attribute were refactored in the production code, moving from the use of snake case(first_name) to camelCase(firstName),as long as the data-qa attribute is not changed, the test code can continue being run as-is.