Examples of using Majority of delegations in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
The majority of delegations supported the general thrust of the EIPs.
The text agreed is a compromise presented by the presidency andsupported by a large majority of delegations.
A vast majority of delegations have welcomed this progress report.
Concluding the discussions, the president of the Council noted the support of a qualified majority of delegations for a provisional compromise text.
A majority of delegations supported the presidency compromise on cabotage.
Regarding the third question which focused on type of ship, a majority of delegations stated that the proposal should not apply to ships operated mainly for the carriage of cargo.
The majority of delegations also supported reinforcing the open method of coordination for social protection and social inclusion.
The Council noted that the draft Council conclusions on how to improve the functioning of the food supply chain had been finalised as presidency conclusions with the support of a large majority of delegations.
The vast majority of delegations supported the creation of a cost-effective and legally sound system that would include the following main features.
While the widening of the scope of the instrument was opposed by a few Member States,a vast majority of delegations expressed reservations about nearly all other new elements contained in the proposal.
A majority of delegations supported the presidency compromise on this proposal, which includes in particular the national electronic register issue.
Regarding the first question which concerned the type of passenger services, a majority of delegations considered that the scope of the proposed regulation should include all types of services with the exception of tourist and sightseeing services.
A majority of delegations supported the idea that the two directives, WEEE and RoHS, could have separate scopes that take account of their different legal bases and objectives.
Discussion by the Council has demonstrated that the Member Stateswish to give the existing European Regulators Group(established under Commission Decision 2002/627/EC) a formal status, but that a majority of delegations were against establishing a new Community agency in this context.
The majority of delegations supported the idea of facilitating payments by the European Social Fund(ESF) and the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.
The general approach does not include the Commission's proposal to incorporate a microchip with the driver card functionalities into the driving licence for professional drivers, since the majority of delegations have doubts as to whether the benefits of such a merger would justify the costs it entails.
A large majority of delegations agreed that framework contracts that member states may enter into on a voluntary basis constitute the most suitable form for a joint procurement.
The text agreed by the Council does not retain the Commission's proposal to incorporate a microchip with driver card functionalities into the driving licence for professional drivers, since the majority of delegations have doubts as to whether the benefits of such a merger would justify the costs it entails.
The majority of delegations considered that enhanced cooperation, as provided for in the EU treaty, is the only option for making progress on the creation of a unified EU patent system.
Following discussion of the outstanding issues, the majority of delegations, in a spirit of compromise, accepted the draft general approach as set out in the presidency's proposal(7537/12), subject to the following changes.
A majority of delegations considered that the task of protection of the principle should be left to each member state when implementing the directive and applying it in individual cases.
As for the second question, on territorial application, a majority of delegations considered that the draft regulation should apply to passenger travelling between Community as well as to those travelling between Community and third country ports.
A majority of delegations stated that a wider use of negotiated procedures in public contracts should be possible and that certain safeguards should also be put in place to ensure equal treatment for tenders.
The following main issues in particular will require further in-depth consideration:the nature of the legal instrument as a majority of delegations have reservations concerning the proposed regulation; the role and competence of the competent authority; and the liability regime and delegated powers of the Commission, which proposed the use of delegated acts for adapting the annexes to the regulation to the latest developments in technologies and procedures.
The majority of delegations recommended that the Regulation on the coordination of social security systems(1408/71) should be supplemented by the Directive on cross-border healthcare and that a"third method" of reimbursement should be avoided.
As a compromise acceptable to the majority of delegations, the text of the draft regulation tabled by the presidency(15282/12) has been amended to allow member states to apply temporary restrictions where a significant and demonstrable problem with secondary trading occurs.
In addition, a vast majority of delegations stressed that there is a need to ensure that the new procedures for direct payments be in line with the objective of simplification of the CAP.
Furthermore, a majority of delegations expressed also concerns about the Commission's intention to reduce TACs by 25% when there was no scientific advice or when only poor information was available.
Moreover, a vast majority of delegations raised concerns that the direct payments and rural development proposals seemed to run counter to the important objective of simplification of the CAP.
A large majority of delegations underlined that the red lines for finding a final compromise are that no significant costs should arise from additional translations and that the new system should not result in legal uncertainty.