Examples of using Straightforward codification in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
This proposal relates to the straightforward codification of the existing laws on the permissible sound level and the exhaust system of motor vehicles.
In writing.- I voted for this report because, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission,the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
This proposal concerns the straightforward codification of the rules already in force on indications or marks identifying the lot to which a foodstuff belongs, without making changes to their substance on which Parliament might need to give an opinion.
I support this report because this proposal involves no more than a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
I totally agree that the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council andthe Commission should be taken into consideration as I think that the proposal in question is simply limited to a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Since the insertion of such a recital would imply a substantive change andwould therefore go beyond straightforward codification, it was considered appropriate to transform the codification into a recast in order to incorporate the necessary amendment.
I agree with the position set out in this report, taking into account the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and because this is,therefore, a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
Since such a redrafting would imply a substantive change, andwould therefore go beyond straightforward codification, it was considered necessary that point 84 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994- Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts- be applied, in the light of the Joint declaration on that point5.
With due regard for the opinions of the legal services of Parliament, the Council and the Commission,which have concluded that the Commission proposal was confined to a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance, I welcome the adoption of this proposal.
Since the insertion of such a recital would have implied a substantive change, andwould have therefore gone beyond straightforward codification, it was considered necessary that point 86 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994- Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts- be applied, in the light of the Joint Declaration on that point7.
In its opinion of 26 June 2003 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts stated that this proposal did indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Since, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission,the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, I am adopting its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on braking devices of wheeled agricultural orforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
In writing.- With this'whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission,the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, the EP adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
In its opinion of 26 June 2003 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts[2]has stated that the above proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
I voted in favour of this report because, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission,the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance and therefore, in the interests of clarity and rationality, the existing texts should be codified.
On 21 September 2010, the Consultative Working Party, made up of the respective legal services of Parliament, the Council and the Commission, having examined the proposal for codifying the Third Council Directive 78/855/EEC of 9 October 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty concerning mergers of public limited liability companies,concluded without dissent that the proposal is effectively a straightforward codification of existing texts, without any change in their substance.
In its opinion of 27.9.2007 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts5 stated that the proposal referred to in point 2 confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on thepermissible sound level and the exhaust system of motor vehicles concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this report on the proposal for a Council regulation on denominations andtechnical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament andof the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on indications ormarks identifying the lot to which a foodstuff belongs concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on rear-mounted roll-over protection structures of narrow-track wheeled agricultural andforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the installation, location, operation and identification of the controls of wheeled agricultural orforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
In its opinion of 7 November 2003, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council andthe Commission set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
At that meeting, an examination of the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council codifying the Third Council Directive 78/855/EEC of 9 October 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty concerning mergers of public limited liability companies resulted in the Consultative Working Party's concluding, without dissent,that the proposal is a straightforward codification of existing texts, without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on roll-over protection structures mounted in front of the driver's seat on narrow-track wheeled agricultural andforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Bearing in mind that the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission concluded, in its opinion, that the proposal concerned does not contain substantive amendments, other than those identified as such, and that, with regard to the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts together with the included amendments,the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing acts without substantive alterations, I approve the present report.