Examples of using Avoidable delay in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Avoidable delay: 15.
In 28% of cases, it is a lack of transparency or the withholding of information,and in 24% avoidable delays.
Avoidable delay in dealing with infringement complaint.
One of the complainants therefore complained on behalf of them all to the Ombudsman,alleging avoidable delay by the Commission.
Avoidable delays(9%)Negligence(6%)Failure to ensure fullment of obligations- Article 226(5%)Legal error 4.
They included lack of transparency,unsatisfactory procedures, avoidable delays, discrimination, failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations and legal errors.
Of cases of maladministration were based on lack of transparency and refusal of information, 19% were based on discrimination and12% were based on avoidable delay.
Other maladministration(9%)Avoidable delay(9%)Discrimination(8%)Negligence(8%)Legal error(4%)Failure to ensure fullment of obligations- Article 226 3.
In his complaint to the Ombudsman, the complainant alleged that the Commission had failed to provide a reply to the EMU's application for the EUC within a reasonable period of time andto provide an explanation for this avoidable delay.
Lack or refusal of information(28%), unfairness(15%), discrimination(12%), avoidable delay(10%), procedural errors(10%) and negligence(5%) were the most common source of complaints.
We are doing what we believe best secures the goals we have been working towards for the last year- better data protection and more legal security for airlines, which are obliged by US law to provide these data, andmaking sure passengers do not suffer avoidable delays.
The main types of alleged maladministration were lack of transparency, including refusal of information, unfairness and abuse of powers,unsatisfactory procedures, avoidable delay, discrimination, negligence, legal errors and failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations.
This was due to avoidable delays in implementation, and as a consequence those countries joining in 2004 have not had the benefit of delivering aid for the measures approved, for the period of about four-and-a-half years from the beginning of 2000 to May 2004, which had been planned by the legislative authority.
The main types of maladministration alleged in admissible complaints were: lack of transparency, including refusal of information; unfairness or abuse of power;unsatisfactory procedures; avoidable delay; discrimination; negligence; legal error; and failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations.
Perhaps more meaningfully, he also reminds us in his report of the examples of maladministration which he gave in his first annual report. These include administrative irregularities or omissions, abuse of power, negligence, unlawful procedures, unfairness, malfunction or incompetence,discrimination, avoidable delay and lack or refusal of information.
The main types of maladministration alleged were lack of transparency, including refusal of information(in 28% of cases), unfairness or abuse of power(18%),unsatisfactory procedures(13%), avoidable delay(9%), discrimination(8%), negligence(8%), legal error(4%), and failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is, failure by the European Commission to carry out its role as“guardian of the Treaty” vis-à-vis the Member States 3.
The main types of maladministration alleged in inquiries opened in 2008 were lack of transparency, including refusal of information(36% of inquiries), unfairness or abuse of power(20%), unsatisfactory procedures(9%),negligence(8%), avoidable delay(8%), legal error(7%), discrimination(5%), and failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is, failure by the Commission to carry out its role as"guardian of the Treaty" vis-à-vis the Member States 5.
The main types of maladministration alleged were lack of transparency, including refusal of information(216 cases), unfairness or abuse of power(135 cases),unsatisfactory procedures(102 cases), avoidable delay(69 cases), discrimination(63 cases), negligence(62 cases), legal error(35 cases), and failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is, failure by the European Commission to carry out its role as“guardian of the Treaty” vis-à-vis the Member States 24 cases.
The main types of maladministration alleged were lack of transparency, including refusal of information(188 cases), unfairness or abuse of power(132 cases), discrimination(103 cases),unsatisfactory procedures(78 cases), avoidable delay(73 cases), negligence(44 cases), failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is failure by the European Commission to carry out its role as“guardian of the Treaty” vis-à-vis the Member States(37 cases), and legal error 29 cases.
The main types of maladministration alleged were lack of transparency(95 cases), discrimination(27 cases), unsatisfactory procedures or failure to respect rights of defence(26 cases), unfairness orabuse of power(39cases), avoidable delay(84 cases) negligence(23 cases), failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is failure by the European Commission to carry out its role as“Guardian of the Treaties”vis-à-vis the Member States(7 cases) and legal error 20 cases.
The main types of maladministration alleged were lack of transparency(69 cases), discrimination(21 cases), unsatisfactory procedures or failure to respect rights of defence(25 cases), unfairness orabuse of power(29 cases), avoidable delay(17 cases) negligence(38 cases), failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is failure by the European Commission to carry out its role as"Guardian of the Treaties" vis-à-vis the Member States(11 cases) and legal error 7 cases.
The main types of maladministration alleged were lack of transparency, including refusal of information(188 cases), unfairness or abuse of power(132 cases), discrimination(103 cases),unsatisfactory procedures(78 cases), avoidable delay(73 cases), negligence(44 cases), failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is failure by the European Commission to carry out its role as“guardian of the Treaty” vis-à-vis the Member States(37 cases), and legal error 29 cases.
A further 15% of complaints were concerned with avoidable administrative delays.