Examples of using Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, patients with mild hepatic impairment had a mean increase in Cmax of 53% and in AUC of 26% of celecoxib.
In addition, N-desmethyl metabolite AUC and Cmax values were significantly increased by 154% and 87%,respectively in cirrhotic subjects compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, patients with mild hepatic impairment had a mean increase in Cmax of 53% and in AUC of 26% of celecoxib.
The AUC to abiraterone increased by approximately 600% andthe fraction of free drug increased by 80% in subjects with severe hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function velpatasvir total plasma exposure(AUCinf) was similar in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.
Systemic exposures after a single dose of sunitinib were similar in subjects with mild or moderate(Child-Pugh class A and B)hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
The mean AUC was unchanged in subjects with mild hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function; however, the mean AUC decreased by 28% and 31%, respectively, in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment.
In subjects with mild hepatic impairment, paritaprevir, ritonavir and ombitasvir mean Cmax and AUC values decreased by 29% to 48%, 34% to 38% and up to 8%,respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Unbound cobimetinib exposures were similar between subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function while subjects with severe hepatic impairment had approximately 2-fold higher exposures see section 4.2.
In clinical studies with axitinib,the systemic exposure to axitinib was approximately two-fold higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class B) compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, systemic exposure following a single dose of axitinib was similar in subjects with mild hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class A) and higher(approximately two-fold) in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment Child-Pugh class B.
In subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment according to the Child-Pugh classification, AUC of empagliflozin increased approximately by 23%, 47%, and 75% and Cmax by approximately 4%, 23%, and 48%,respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Limited data on the effect of hepatic impairment(including Child-Pugh C classification of chronic liver disease)on the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole demonstrate an increase in plasma exposure compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, but do not suggest that dose adjustment is necessary see sections 4.4 and 5.2.
Provided slightly higher plasma amprenavir Cmax(17%), slightly higher plasma amprenavir AUC(0-12)(22%), similar plasma total amprenavir C12 values and approximately 117% higher plasma unbound amprenavir C12 values compared to subjects with normal hepatic function receiving the standard fosamprenavir/ ritonavir 700 mg/ 100 mg twice daily regimen.
In a clinical study using single doses of 20 mg/kg deferasirox dispersible tablets, the average exposure was increased by 16% insubjects with mild hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh Class A) and by 76% in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh Class B) compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
In subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, ombitasvir and ritonavir mean Cmax and AUC values decreased by 29% to 30% and 30 to 33%, respectively, while paritaprevir mean Cmax andAUC values increased by 26% to 62% compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. see sections 4.2, 4.4, and 4.8.
Geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUClast were 11% and 25% higher respectively for subjects with mild hepatic impairment, and 32% and46% higher respectively for subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
In subjects with mild hepatic impairment( Child-Pugh score of 5-6), the dosage regimen of fosamprenavir 700 mg twice daily with a reduced dosing frequency of ritonavir 100 mg once daily provided slightly higherplasma amprenavir Cmax( 17%), slightly higher plasma amprenavir AUC( 0-12)( 22%), similar plasma total amprenavir C12 values and approximately 117% higher plasma unbound amprenavir C12 values compared to subjects with normal hepatic function receiving the standard fosamprenavir/ ritonavir 700 mg/ 100 mg twice daily regimen.
Compared to healthy subjects with normal hepatic function, the mean steady-state AUC of simeprevir was 2.4-fold higher in non-HCV infected subjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class B) and 5.2-fold higher in non-HCV infected subjects with severe hepatic impairment Child-Pugh class C.